Difference between revisions of "ICBC and Basic Compulsory Autoplan Coverage (12:X)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 124: Line 124:
*e) using the vehicle for a different purpose than the one declared by the insured in his or her application for insurance, except as “occasionally” permitted (IVR, s 55(2(a)); or  
*e) using the vehicle for a different purpose than the one declared by the insured in his or her application for insurance, except as “occasionally” permitted (IVR, s 55(2(a)); or  
*f) naming in the owner’s certificate someone as the principal operator of the insured vehicle who is not actually the principle operator (IVR, s 75).  
*f) naming in the owner’s certificate someone as the principal operator of the insured vehicle who is not actually the principle operator (IVR, s 75).  
'''NOTE:''' When the court determines who the principle driver is, it will consider the entire period covered by the insurance plan: see ''Dehm v ICBC'' (1982), 32 BCL.R. 23.  
**'''NOTE:''' When the court determines who the principle driver is, it will consider the entire period covered by the insurance plan: see ''Dehm v ICBC'' (1982), 32 BCL.R. 23.  


Despite any breach of condition by an insured, insurance money is still payable to '''third parties''' by ICBC in cases where the insured person was:  
Despite any breach of condition by an insured, insurance money is still payable to '''third parties''' by ICBC in cases where the insured person was:  

Navigation menu