Difference between revisions of "Reviewing Your Non-profit Society's Bylaws"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 49: Line 49:
==Conducting a clause-by-clause analysis==
==Conducting a clause-by-clause analysis==


Whether you are working from your society’s existing bylaws or the new model bylaws, you should work through each clause with an eye to two factors:
Whether you are working from your society's existing bylaws or the new model bylaws, you should work through each clause with an eye to two factors:


* Step 1: Does the clause align with the new Act?
* Step 1: Does the clause align with the new Act?
Line 62: Line 62:
<blockquote>'''''Discipline and expulsion of member'''
<blockquote>'''''Discipline and expulsion of member'''


70 (1) The bylaws of a society may provide for the discipline or expulsion, or both, of members.
70(1) The bylaws of a society may provide for the discipline or expulsion, or both, of members.


(2) Unless the bylaws provide otherwise, a member of a society may be disciplined or expelled by special resolution.
(2) Unless the bylaws provide otherwise, a member of a society may be disciplined or expelled by special resolution.
Line 72: Line 72:
     (b) give the member a reasonable opportunity to make representations to the society respecting the proposed discipline or expulsion.''</blockquote>
     (b) give the member a reasonable opportunity to make representations to the society respecting the proposed discipline or expulsion.''</blockquote>


Let’s assume the relevant provision in the society’s existing bylaws was drawn from the old Schedule B model bylaws under the old Society Act, which read:
Let's assume the relevant provision in the society's existing bylaws was drawn from the old Schedule B model bylaws under the old ''Society Act'', which read:


<blockquote>'''''Part 2 – Membership'''
<blockquote>'''''Part 2 – Membership'''


8 (1) A member may be expelled by a special resolution of the members passed at a general meeting.
8(1) A member may be expelled by a special resolution of the members passed at a general meeting.


(2) The notice of special resolution for expulsion must be accompanied by a brief statement of the reasons for the proposed expulsion.
(2) The notice of special resolution for expulsion must be accompanied by a brief statement of the reasons for the proposed expulsion.
Line 84: Line 84:
The new model bylaws do not address the expulsion or discipline of a member.
The new model bylaws do not address the expulsion or discipline of a member.


Step 1: Does the clause align with the new Act?
==== Step 1: Does the clause align with the new Act? ====


The wording in the existing bylaws is similar but slightly different from provision in new Act. The bylaw deals only with expulsion; the new Act deals with expulsion and discipline. The bylaw provides the member with “an opportunity to be heard at the general meeting”; the new Act provides the member with “a reasonable opportunity to make representations to the society”, which is broader wording, not restricted to the general meeting or to an opportunity to say something.
The wording in the existing bylaws is similar but slightly different from provision in new Act. The bylaw deals only with expulsion; the new Act deals with expulsion and discipline. The bylaw provides the member with "an opportunity to be heard at the general meeting"; the new Act provides the member with "a reasonable opportunity to make representations to the society", which is broader wording, not restricted to the general meeting or to an opportunity to say something.


There’s an argument to make that the existing bylaw and the Act don’t fully conflict; that is, that the Act '''extends''' the wording of the bylaw. But to whatever extent that the existing bylaw and the Act are in conflict, the Act would prevail.
There's an argument to make that the existing bylaw and the Act don't fully conflict; that is, that the Act '''extends''' the wording of the bylaw. But to whatever extent that the existing bylaw and the Act are in conflict, the Act would prevail.


Step 2: Does the clause support the needs of your society?
==== Step 2: Does the clause support the needs of your society? ====


The new Act provides that a member can be disciplined or expelled by special resolution '''unless the bylaws provide otherwise.''' Consider whether the needs of your society would be better met by having a different procedure, such as one involving a board of directors process.
The new Act provides that a member can be disciplined or expelled by special resolution '''unless the bylaws provide otherwise'''. Consider whether the needs of your society would be better met by having a different procedure, such as one involving a board of directors process.


If you are revising the existing bylaws, the options would be to:
If you are revising the existing bylaws, the options would be to:
Line 98: Line 98:
* Delete the provision from the existing bylaws (and let the matter of expulsion or discipline of a member be governed by the provision in the Act).
* Delete the provision from the existing bylaws (and let the matter of expulsion or discipline of a member be governed by the provision in the Act).
* Revise the provision in the existing bylaws to provide a different procedure for dealing with expulsion or discipline of a member.
* Revise the provision in the existing bylaws to provide a different procedure for dealing with expulsion or discipline of a member.
If you are working from the new model bylaws, the options would be to:
If you are working from the new model bylaws, the options would be to:


Line 105: Line 106:
===Example 2: Quorum at general meetings===
===Example 2: Quorum at general meetings===


Let’s look at a second example, dealing with quorum at general meetings.
Let's look at a second example, dealing with quorum at general meetings.


The relevant provision in the new ''Societies Act'' reads:
The relevant provision in the new ''Societies Act'' reads:
Line 111: Line 112:
<blockquote>'''''Quorum'''
<blockquote>'''''Quorum'''


82 (1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), the quorum for the transaction of business at a general meeting is
82(1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), the quorum for the transaction of business at a general meeting is
 
:(a) 3 voting members, unless paragraph (b) of this subsection applies, or
(a) 3 voting members, unless paragraph (b) of this subsection applies, or
:(b) if the bylaws provide for a quorum greater than 3 voting members, that quorum.
 
(b) if the bylaws provide for a quorum greater than 3 voting members, that quorum.


(2) The bylaws of a society may, for the purposes of subsection (1) (b), provide for a quorum that is greater than 3 voting members, by doing either of the following:
(2) The bylaws of a society may, for the purposes of subsection (1) (b), provide for a quorum that is greater than 3 voting members, by doing either of the following:
 
:(a) specifying the number of voting members that constitutes a quorum;
(a) specifying the number of voting members that constitutes a quorum;
:(b) requiring that the quorum be calculated as a specified percentage of voting members or on another basis.
 
(b) requiring that the quorum be calculated as a specified percentage of voting members or on another basis.


(3) If a society has fewer voting members than the quorum provided for in subsection (1), the quorum for the transaction of business at a general meeting is all of the voting members.
(3) If a society has fewer voting members than the quorum provided for in subsection (1), the quorum for the transaction of business at a general meeting is all of the voting members.
Line 127: Line 124:
(4) The bylaws of a society may provide that if a general meeting is adjourned until a later date because a quorum is not present, and if, at the continuation of the adjourned meeting, a quorum is again not present, the voting members present constitute a quorum for the purposes of that meeting.''</blockquote>
(4) The bylaws of a society may provide that if a general meeting is adjourned until a later date because a quorum is not present, and if, at the continuation of the adjourned meeting, a quorum is again not present, the voting members present constitute a quorum for the purposes of that meeting.''</blockquote>


Let’s say the provision in the society’s existing bylaws was drawn from the old Schedule B model bylaws, and reads:
Let's say the provision in the society's existing bylaws was drawn from the old Schedule B model bylaws, and reads:


<blockquote>'''''16''' (3) A quorum is 3 members present or a greater number that the members may determine at a general meeting.''</blockquote>
<blockquote>'''''16''' (3) A quorum is 3 members present or a greater number that the members may determine at a general meeting.''</blockquote>
Line 136: Line 133:
''</blockquote>
''</blockquote>


Step 1: Does the clause align with the new Act?
==== Step 1: Does the clause align with the new Act? ====
 
There are some issues arising from the society's existing bylaws when read together with the relevant provision in the new Act:


There are some issues arising from the society’s existing bylaws when read together with the relevant provision in the new Act:
* The existing bylaws refer to "members present". The provision in the new Act refers to "voting members".
* The provision in the new Act contemplates the bylaws specifying the number of voting members or requiring a calculation as a percentage of voting members or on another basis. Yet the existing bylaws say "or a greater number that the members may determine at a general meeting". That wording does not specify a number of voting members or a calculation. Which places the wording in the existing bylaws somewhat in tension with the wording of the new Act.


* The existing bylaws refer to “members present”. The provision in the new Act refers to “voting members”.
==== Step 2: Does the clause support the needs of your society? ====
* The provision in the new Act contemplates the bylaws specifying the number of voting members or requiring a calculation as a percentage of voting members or on another basis. Yet the existing bylaws say “or a greater number that the members may determine at a general meeting”. That wording does not specify a number of voting members or a calculation. Which places the wording in the existing bylaws somewhat in tension with the wording of the new Act.
Step 2: Does the clause support the needs of your society?


The new model bylaws provide for a quorum of 3 voting members or 10% of voting members, whichever is greater. Consider whether 3 voting members is too few for your society, what percentage of voting members might be a good fit for your society, and whether a different mechanism to determine quorum (so long as it complied with the Act) would be preferable.
Let's turn our attention to the quorum provision in the new model bylaws. The bylaw provides for a quorum of 3 voting members or 10% of voting members, whichever is greater. Consider whether 3 voting members is too few for your society, what percentage of voting members might be a good fit for your society, and whether a different mechanism to determine quorum (so long as it complied with the Act) would be preferable.


For example, for societies with larger memberships, 10% can be hard to achieve. For a society with 2,000 members, 10% is 200 people – a very large number to try to get out to an AGM. A higher fixed number and a lower percentage – say, 20 voting members or 2% of voting members – could be a better fit for a society of that size.
For example, for societies with larger memberships, 10% can be hard to achieve. For a society with 2,000 members, 10% is 200 people – a very large number to try to get out to an AGM. A higher fixed number and a lower percentage – say, 20 voting members or 2% of voting members – could be a better fit for a society of that size.
9,075

edits

Navigation menu