5,230
edits
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Recent cases suggest that in certain circumstances some earnings '''may not delay''' the start of an EI claim. In ''Attorney General of Canada v Doreen Myers'', 2006 FCA57 the court found that the claimant’s vacation pay did not delay the start of a claim because it was not a payment made by reason of a separation, thus allowing benefits to be received earlier, and possibly at a higher rate. | Recent cases suggest that in certain circumstances some earnings '''may not delay''' the start of an EI claim. In ''Attorney General of Canada v Doreen Myers'', 2006 FCA57 the court found that the claimant’s vacation pay did not delay the start of a claim because it was not a payment made by reason of a separation, thus allowing benefits to be received earlier, and possibly at a higher rate. | ||
Income that '''does not''' count as earnings and will not delay the start of the claim includes: | Income that '''does not''' count as earnings and will not delay the start of the claim includes: |
edits