Difference between revisions of "Wills Variation Claims (16:VII)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:


:'''NOTE:''' In a decision of the BC Supreme Court, ''Ward v Ward Estate'', 2006 BCSC 448 and it was more recently in Kuzyk v Czajkowski, 2016 BCSC 1109, it was held that a signed pre-nupital agreement where both parties gave up any right or interest to the other's estate was not determinative in a claim under the ''Wills Variation Act''.  
:'''NOTE:''' In a decision of the BC Supreme Court, ''Ward v Ward Estate'', 2006 BCSC 448 and it was more recently in Kuzyk v Czajkowski, 2016 BCSC 1109, it was held that a signed pre-nupital agreement where both parties gave up any right or interest to the other's estate was not determinative in a claim under the ''Wills Variation Act''.  
it was held that a marriage agreement that purported to bar claims under the ''Wills Variation Act'' was not determinative of the issue.


== B. Definition of Spouse in WESA ==
== B. Definition of Spouse in WESA ==
5,109

edits

Navigation menu