Difference between revisions of "Consumer Protection from Deceptive and Unconscionable Acts (11:IV)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 64: Line 64:
=== 2. Unconscionable Acts ===
=== 2. Unconscionable Acts ===


Sections 7 to 9 of the ''BPCPA'' now set out clear prohibitions. Unconscionable acts involve high pressure tactics or demanding consideration far in excess of the market, and may occur before, during or after the consumer transaction. Under s 10(1), if an unconscionable act or practice occurred in respect of a consumer transaction, that consumer transaction is not binding on the consumer or guarantor. The court will look at the particular vulnerabilities of the consumer, such as mental infirmity, ignorance, illiteracy, age or inability to understand the  character, nature or language of the consumer transaction, which will trigger the reviewability of that transaction in the consumer’s mind. Both the common law and statutes hold the supplier to a stringent standard, demanding that he or she not act unreasonably in order to protect his or her own interests.  
Sections 7 to 9 of the ''BPCPA'' now set out clear prohibitions. Unconscionable acts involve high pressure tactics or demanding consideration far in excess of the market, and may occur before, during or after the consumer transaction. Under s 10(1), if an unconscionable act or practice occurred in respect of a consumer transaction, that consumer transaction is not binding on the consumer or guarantor. The court will look at the particular vulnerabilities of the consumer, such as mental infirmity, ignorance, illiteracy, age or inability to understand the  character, nature or language of the consumer transaction, which will trigger the reviewability of that transaction in the consumer’s mind. Both the common law and statutes hold the supplier to a stringent standard, demanding that they not act unreasonably in order to protect their own interests.  


Under s 9(2), if it is alleged that a supplier committed or engaged in an unconscionable act or practice, the burden of proof is on the supplier to show that the unconscionable act or practice was not committed.  
Under s 9(2), if it is alleged that a supplier committed or engaged in an unconscionable act or practice, the burden of proof is on the supplier to show that the unconscionable act or practice was not committed.  
5,109

edits

Navigation menu