Difference between revisions of "Conditional Sales Contracts and Security Agreements (11:VI)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 15, 2019}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = consumer}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = consumer}}


Line 68: Line 69:
Therefore, if the consumer does not get what they have paid for, that person may not be required to pay the loan back when pressed for payment by the assignee. Also, if the seller does not fulfil obligations under a warranty, the consumer will be able to resist payment.  (See ''Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Geldart'', [1985] BCJ No 1973 and ''Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Kabatoff'', [1986] BCJ No 942)
Therefore, if the consumer does not get what they have paid for, that person may not be required to pay the loan back when pressed for payment by the assignee. Also, if the seller does not fulfil obligations under a warranty, the consumer will be able to resist payment.  (See ''Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Geldart'', [1985] BCJ No 1973 and ''Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Kabatoff'', [1986] BCJ No 942)


{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 15, 2019}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}

Navigation menu