Difference between revisions of "Mental Health and the Criminal Code (14:IX)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 14, 2020}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = mentalhealth}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = mentalhealth}}


Line 80: Line 81:
There is some discrepancy between the provinces as to whether one can be retroactively classified as a “high-risk accused”. In British Columbia, it has been found that applying a retroactive “high risk” designation to trials that occurred before the legislation came into effect is not unconstitutional (''Schoenborn'' 2015 BCSC 2254).). However, in Quebec it was decided that a retroactive application is unconstitutional (see ''R v CR'', 2015 JQ No 2448).
There is some discrepancy between the provinces as to whether one can be retroactively classified as a “high-risk accused”. In British Columbia, it has been found that applying a retroactive “high risk” designation to trials that occurred before the legislation came into effect is not unconstitutional (''Schoenborn'' 2015 BCSC 2254).). However, in Quebec it was decided that a retroactive application is unconstitutional (see ''R v CR'', 2015 JQ No 2448).


{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 14, 2020}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}

Navigation menu