Difference between revisions of "Parenting Orders, Guardianship, and Contact (3:XI)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= July 18, 2019}}
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= September 29, 2020}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = family}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = family}}


Line 19: Line 19:


The ''DA'' applies only to married couples. Under the Act, the person making the application for custody must have been “habitually resident” in the province for at least one year prior.
The ''DA'' applies only to married couples. Under the Act, the person making the application for custody must have been “habitually resident” in the province for at least one year prior.
As of March 1, 2021, s 16 of the DA will be repealed and replaced. Under the new provisions of s 16, the court will only consider the best interests of the child in the course of making a parenting order or a contact order, and when allocating parenting time. The new subsections 16(2-6) outline the factors under consideration when “best interest of the child” is assessed. The updated section 16(4) outlines the role of family violence in assessing the best interests of the child (see Section VIII: Family Violence).
Additionally, the amendments to the DA will result in changes to the terms of guardianship:
*Replacing of the terms “custody” and “custody order” with “parenting time” and “parenting order”.
*Using the term “contact order” to characterize time spent with someone other than a spouse, including grandparents.
*Adding the term “decision-making responsibility” to define a non-exhaustive list of areas of significant weight and how decisions about those areas must be made (with the “best interests of the child” in mind).
The aim of these changes is to emphasize the “best interests of the child” by focusing on relationships with children.


=== 2. Family Law Act ===
=== 2. Family Law Act ===
Line 37: Line 46:
The Supreme Court has ''parens patriae'' jurisdiction over all children in the province. In operation, this can allow the Court to transcend the statutory letter of the law in drafting orders that best represent the best interests of the child.  
The Supreme Court has ''parens patriae'' jurisdiction over all children in the province. In operation, this can allow the Court to transcend the statutory letter of the law in drafting orders that best represent the best interests of the child.  


A written agreement about custody or guardianship may be given the force of a court order under section 44 of the ''FLA''. Under the ''FRA'', the relevant sections were 121 and 122. Any orders made under the ''FRA'' are still in force. An order made under the ''DA'' can be registered for enforcement in any other province’s Supreme Court registry.
A written agreement about custody or guardianship may be given the force of a court order under section 44 of the ''FLA''. Any orders made under the ''FRA'' are still in force. An order made under the ''DA'' can be registered for enforcement in any other province’s Supreme Court registry.


=== 2. Provincial Court ===
=== 2. Provincial Court ===


The Provincial Court has jurisdiction to deal with all matters relating to custody, guardianship and access to children, and the ''Child, Family and Community Service Act''. This includes restraining orders but does not include orders restraining entry to the matrimonial home. A written agreement about custody or guardianship may be given the force of a court order, or s 44 of the ''FLA'', if it is filed in court.  
The Provincial Court has jurisdiction to deal with all matters relating to custody, guardianship and access to children, and the ''Child, Family and Community Service Act'' [''CFCSA'']. This includes restraining orders but does not include orders restraining entry to the matrimonial home. A written agreement about custody or guardianship may be given the force of a court order, or s 44 of the ''FLA'', if it is filed in court.  


== D. Custody ==
== D. Custody ==
Line 58: Line 67:
* (d) the history of the child's care;
* (d) the history of the child's care;
* (e) the child's need for stability, given the child's age and stage of development;
* (e) the child's need for stability, given the child's age and stage of development;
* (f) the ability of each person who is a guardian or seeks guardianship of the child, or who has or seeks parental responsibilities, parenting time or contact with the child, to exercise his or her responsibilities;
* (f) the ability of each person who is a guardian or seeks guardianship of the child, or who has or seeks parental responsibilities, parenting time or contact with the child, to exercise their responsibilities;
* (g) the impact of any family violence on the child's safety, security or well-being, whether the family violence is directed toward the child or another family member;
* (g) the impact of any family violence on the child's safety, security or well-being, whether the family violence is directed toward the child or another family member;
* (h) whether the actions of a person responsible for family violence indicate that the person may be impaired in his or her ability to care for the child and meet the child's needs;
* (h) whether the actions of a person responsible for family violence indicate that the person may be impaired in their ability to care for the child and meet the child's needs;
* (i) the appropriateness of an arrangement that would require the child's guardians to cooperate on issues affecting the child, including whether requiring cooperation would increase any risks to the safety, security or well-being of the child or other family members;
* (i) the appropriateness of an arrangement that would require the child's guardians to cooperate on issues affecting the child, including whether requiring cooperation would increase any risks to the safety, security or well-being of the child or other family members;
* (j) any civil or criminal proceeding relevant to the child's safety, security or well-being.
* (j) any civil or criminal proceeding relevant to the child's safety, security or well-being.
Line 69: Line 78:
* (9) In making an order under this section, the court shall not take into consideration the past conduct of any person unless the conduct is relevant to the ability of that person to act as a parent of a child.
* (9) In making an order under this section, the court shall not take into consideration the past conduct of any person unless the conduct is relevant to the ability of that person to act as a parent of a child.
* (10) In making an order under this section, the court shall give effect to the principle that a child of the marriage should have as much contact with each spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the child and, for that purpose, shall take into consideration the willingness of the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate such contact.
* (10) In making an order under this section, the court shall give effect to the principle that a child of the marriage should have as much contact with each spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the child and, for that purpose, shall take into consideration the willingness of the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate such contact.
As of March 1, 2021, s 16(8-10) of the DA will be repealed. The relevant replacements are s 16(1, 5-6):
*(1) The term “parenting time” will replace “custody” in the DA.)
*(5) In determining what is in the best interests of the child, the court shall not take into consideration the past conduct of any person unless the conduct is relevant to the exercise of their parenting time, decision-making responsibility or contact with the child under a contact order.
*(6) In allocating parenting time, the court shall give effect to the principle that a child should have as much time with each spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the child.


These factors should not be viewed as a checklist. Rather, the discretionary, contextual, and complex nature of custody cases makes it more appropriate for the factors to be viewed holistically. Similarly, these factors do not necessarily form an exhaustive list of the factors to be considered. The best interests argument is often expansive, considering a range of factors illuminated at both the statutory and common-law level.  
These factors should not be viewed as a checklist. Rather, the discretionary, contextual, and complex nature of custody cases makes it more appropriate for the factors to be viewed holistically. Similarly, these factors do not necessarily form an exhaustive list of the factors to be considered. The best interests argument is often expansive, considering a range of factors illuminated at both the statutory and common-law level.  
Line 86: Line 101:
=== 2. Types of Custody Orders ===  
=== 2. Types of Custody Orders ===  


:'''NOTE:''' “Custody” is a term that only appears in the ''DA'' and so only applies to claims that are proceeding in Supreme Court under the ''DA''.  
:'''NOTE:''' “Custody” is a term that only appears in the ''DA'' and so only applies to claims that are proceeding in Supreme Court under the ''DA''. As of March 1, 2021, “custody” will be replaced with “parenting order” under the ''DA''.


==== a) Interim Orders ====
==== a) Interim Orders ====
Line 108: Line 123:
==== e) Split Custody ====
==== e) Split Custody ====


“Split custody” is a term used by the ''Federal Child Support Guidelines'', and not by either the ''DA'' or the ''FLA''. On rare occasions, courts will order siblings to live with separate parents. This is usually a drastic solution, ordered only after a ''FLA'' section 211 report (a court-ordered report respecting the needs of a child, the views of a child, and the ability and willingness of one of the parents to satisfy the needs of a child) is submitted to the Court. A split custody order will affect child support.
“Split custody” is a term used by the ''Federal Child Support Guidelines'', and not by either the ''DA'' or the ''FLA''. On rare occasions, courts will order siblings to live with separate parents. This is usually a drastic solution, ordered only after an ''FLA'' section 211 report (a court-ordered report respecting the needs of a child, the views of a child, and the ability and willingness of one of the parents to satisfy the needs of a child) is submitted to the Court. A split custody order will affect child support.


=== 3. Other Custody Issues ===
=== 3. Other Custody Issues ===
Line 126: Line 141:
==== c) Parental Mobility (Under the FLA, this is referred to as Relocation which has separate considerations from that of Mobility under the DA) ====
==== c) Parental Mobility (Under the FLA, this is referred to as Relocation which has separate considerations from that of Mobility under the DA) ====


Relocation is defined and explained under Division 6 of the ''FLA''. It considers relocation of a child that can reasonably be expected to have a significant impact on the child’s relationship with his/her guardian(s) or other adults with which the child has a significant relationship (s 65). The guardian intending to relocate with the child must provide 60 day written notice to all other guardians and persons having contact with the child (s 66). The notice must include the date of the relocation, and the name of the proposed location. Exemptions to these requirements can be granted by the Court if they are satisfied that the notice cannot be given without incurring a risk of family violence by another guardian or a person having contact with the child or there is no ongoing relationship between the child and the other guardian or the person having contact with the child (s 66(2)).   
Relocation is defined and explained under Division 6 of the ''FLA''. It considers relocation of a child that can reasonably be expected to have a significant impact on the child’s relationship with his/her guardian(s) or other adults with which the child has a significant relationship (s 65). The guardian intending to relocate with the child must provide 60-day written notice to all other guardians and persons having contact with the child (s 66). The notice must include the date of the relocation, and the name of the proposed location. Exemptions to these requirements can be granted by the Court if they are satisfied that the notice cannot be given without incurring a risk of family violence by another guardian or a person having contact with the child or there is no ongoing relationship between the child and the other guardian or the person having contact with the child (s 66(2)).   


The child’s other guardian(s) can object to the relocation within 30 days of receiving the notice. If an objection is made, the guardian requesting the relocation must satisfy the court that (s 69(4)(a)):  
The child’s other guardian(s) can object to the relocation within 30 days of receiving the notice. If an objection is made, the guardian requesting the relocation must satisfy the court that (s 69(4)(a)):  
Line 156: Line 171:
== E. Access ==
== E. Access ==


"Access" is the term under the ''DA''. Under the ''FLA'', it is called "Parenting Time" for guardians, or "Contact" for non-guardians.  
"Access" is the term used under the ''DA''. As of March 1, 2021, the term “access” will be removed from the DA, and the term “contact order” will be used to describe arrangements for non-guardians. Under the ''FLA'', the terms are "parenting time" for guardians, or "contact" for non-guardians.  


Proceedings regarding parenting arrangements or contact that have been started, but not determined, before the ''FLA'' is in force, do not need special transition sections. Section 4 of the ''Interpretation Act'' provides a default rule that the Act will be used upon it becoming effective, so cases started under the ''FRA'' will be determined under the ''FLA''.  
Proceedings regarding parenting arrangements or contact that have been started, but not determined, before the ''FLA'' came into force (March 18, 2013), do not need special transition sections. Section 4 of the ''Interpretation Act'' provides a default rule that the Act will be used upon it becoming effective, so cases started under the ''FRA'' will be determined under the ''FLA''.  


Unless a parent poses a risk to the safety or well-being of the child, he or she will usually be allowed access or visiting rights. Courts can make an order for access and may view a custodial parent who denies access as acting against the best interests of the child.  
Unless a parent poses a risk to the safety or well-being of the child, they will usually be allowed access or visiting rights. Courts can make an order for access and may view a custodial parent who denies access as acting against the best interests of the child.  


:'''NOTE:''' It is important to note that access is a distinct and separate issue from child support. '''Denial of access is not grounds to withhold support; nor is a failure to pay support grounds for withholding access.'''
:'''NOTE:''' It is important to note that access is a distinct and separate issue from child support. '''Denial of access is not grounds to withhold support; nor is a failure to pay support grounds for withholding access.'''
Line 207: Line 222:
#*ii. be removed from British Columbia.  
#*ii. be removed from British Columbia.  


B.C. courts are required to enforce extra-provincial orders (s 75) with certain exceptions (s 76). Such exceptions include situations where the child would suffer serious harm if he/she was returned to the guardian or leaving British Columbia (s 76(1)(a)).   
B.C. courts are required to enforce extra-provincial orders (s 75) with certain exceptions (s 76). Such exceptions include situations where the child would suffer serious harm if they were returned to the guardian or leaving British Columbia (s 76(1)(a)).   


If one spouse is not in B.C., the only B.C. Court that the B.C. residing spouse can proceed in is the B.C. Supreme Court, because the Provincial Court has no jurisdiction outside of the province.
If one spouse is not in B.C., the only B.C. Court that the B.C. residing spouse can proceed in is the B.C. Supreme Court, because the Provincial Court has no jurisdiction outside of the province.
Line 241: Line 256:
*2. A Ministry of Children and Family Development records check;
*2. A Ministry of Children and Family Development records check;
*3. A Protection Order Registry records check; and
*3. A Protection Order Registry records check; and
*4. A criminal records check.
*4. A criminal record check.
 
Effective May 2021, the repealed Provincial Court (Family) Rules will be replaced by the new Provincial Court Family Rules. The Guardianship Affidavit (Form 5) is included in the new Rules and requires identical information to what is stated above (see Rules 26, 51, and 172).  


If an application is made for guardianship of a treaty First Nation’s child, the child’s First Nation’s government must be served notice of the application and has standing in the proceeding (ss. 208 and 209).
If an application is made for guardianship of a treaty First Nation’s child, the child’s First Nation’s government must be served notice of the application and has standing in the proceeding (ss. 208 and 209).


At the time of birth, the two parents of a child are presumed to be its birth mother and its biological father unless the child was born as a result of assisted reproduction (section 26, ''FLA''). Assisted reproduction has, at present, always included the use of one or more of donated eggs, donated sperm, and the cooperation of a woman who is willing to carry the baby to term. Section 24 of the FLA clarifies that a donor of eggs or sperm is not the parent of a child on the basis of their biological contribution alone – donors cannot be made to pay child support unless there is some other connection to the child which justifies holding that the person is a parent under the FLA. If a donor wishes to be regarded as a parent, written agreements can be drafted and signed before the child’s birth which would substantiate their parental claim under the FLA. Unlike donors, surrogate mothers are presumed to be a parent of the child under the FLA since they are the birth mother. However, this presumption can be overcome by the intended parents and the surrogate mother signing a written agreement before the child is conceived which states that the surrogate mother will not be a parent to that child. Without such an agreement, the surrogate mother and biological father would be the presumed parents.
At the time of birth, the two parents of a child are presumed to be their biological parents unless the child was born as a result of assisted reproduction (section 26, ''FLA''). Assisted reproduction has, at present, always included the use of one or more of donated eggs, donated sperm, and the cooperation of a woman who is willing to carry the baby to term. Section 24 of the FLA clarifies that a donor of eggs or sperm is not the parent of a child on the basis of their biological contribution alone – donors cannot be made to pay child support unless there is some other connection to the child which justifies holding that the person is a parent under the FLA. If a donor wishes to be regarded as a parent, written agreements can be drafted and signed before the child’s birth which would substantiate their parental claim under the FLA. Unlike donors, surrogates are presumed to be a parent of the child under the ''FLA'' since they are the birth parent. However, this presumption can be overcome by the intended parents and the surrogate mother signing a written agreement before the child is conceived which states that the surrogate mother will not be a parent to that child. Without such an agreement, the surrogate and sperm-providing parent would be the presumed parents.


Section 41 of the ''FLA'' lists out the parental responsibilities with respect to a child:  
Section 41 of the ''FLA'' lists out the parental responsibilities with respect to a child:  
*(a) making day-to-day decisions affecting the child and having day-to-day care, control and supervisionof the child;  
*(a) making day-to-day decisions affecting the child and having day-to-day care, control and supervision of the child;  
*(b) making decisions respecting where the child will reside;  
*(b) making decisions respecting where the child will reside;  
*(c) making decisions respecting with whom the child will live and associate;  
*(c) making decisions respecting with whom the child will live and associate;  
Line 289: Line 306:
*e) the parties can resolve the matter in court.
*e) the parties can resolve the matter in court.


== G. Parenting Responsibilities and Parenting Time ==
=== 1. Family Law Act ===
According to section 42 of the FLA, parenting time refers to the amount of time that a child spends under the care of a guardian, as determined by an order or agreement. When the child is under their care, guardians assume responsibility for day-to-day care and decision-making for the child (please see section 41 of the FLA for a range of parenting responsibilities). Parenting time and responsibilities may not be allocated equally amongst guardians, and guardians may or may not be required to consult with one another depending on the terms of the order or agreement.
Decisions as to parenting time and responsibilities are determined according to the best interests of the child only. Section 40 of the FLA notes that the equal division of parenting time and parenting responsibilities is not presumed to be in the best interests of the child, nor should it be presumed that it is inherently better to make decisions separately or jointly. Guardians should not expect that they are entitled to equal sharing of parenting time or parenting responsibility. The best interests of the child are determined by weighing the following non-exhaustive list of considerations set out in section 37(2) of the FLA:
*(a)the child's health and emotional well-being;
*(b)the child's views, unless it would be inappropriate to consider them;
*(c)the nature and strength of the relationships between the child and significant persons in the child's life;
*(d)the history of the child's care;
*(e)the child's need for stability, given the child's age and stage of development;
*(f)the ability of each person who is a guardian or seeks guardianship of the child, or who has or seeks parental responsibilities, parenting time or contact with the child, to exercise his or her responsibilities;
*(g)the impact of any family violence on the child's safety, security or well-being, whether the family violence is directed toward the child or another family member;
*(h)whether the actions of a person responsible for family violence indicate that the person may be impaired in his or her ability to care for the child and meet the child's needs;
*(i)the appropriateness of an arrangement that would require the child's guardians to cooperate on issues affecting the child, including whether requiring cooperation would increase any risks to the safety, security or well-being of the child or other family members;
*(j)any civil or criminal proceeding relevant to the child's safety, security or well-being.
A person’s conduct is considered only where their conduct stands to impact any of the above considerations regarding the best interests of the child.
=== 2. Divorce Act ===
Under the current DA, the term “custody” is used to refer to matters concerning the care, upbringing, and other relevant details pertaining to a child (s 2); custody is designated by what is referred to as an order for custody under the current DA. The provisions of section 16 of the DA give a brief overview of how an order for custody is decided and issued, including who may apply for an order, who may issue an order, and several of the court’s considerations when issuing such orders.
As of March 1, 2021, updates to the DA mean that the term “custody” will be replaced by “parenting time” and “parenting responsibilities” to emphasize the importance of the needs of the child rather than on the child as a possession of a parent. Similarly, “order for custody” will be replaced by “parenting order.” Section 16(1) through 16(10) will be repealed and replaced with a new section entitled “Best Interests of the Child”. This section will include more expansive provisions which focus on determining parenting time and responsibilities based on the best interests of the child. The new section 16(3) will provide guidance as to the factors to be considered, including:
*(a) the child’s needs, given the child’s age and stage of development, such as the child’s need for stability;
*(b) the nature and strength of the child’s relationship with each spouse, each of the child’s siblings and grandparents and any other person who plays an important role in the child’s life;
*(c) each spouse’s willingness to support the development and maintenance of the child’s relationship with the other spouse;
*(d) the history of care of the child;
*(e) the child’s views and preferences, giving due weight to the child’s age and maturity, unless they cannot be ascertained;
*(f) the child’s cultural, linguistic, religious and spiritual upbringing and heritage, including Indigenous upbringing and heritage;
*(g) any plans for the child’s care;
*(h) the ability and willingness of each person in respect of whom the order would apply to care for and meet the needs of the child;
*(i) the ability and willingness of each person in respect of whom the order would apply to communicate and cooperate, in particular with one another, on matters affecting the child;
*(j) any family violence and its impact on, among other things,
**i. the ability and willingness of any person who engaged in the family violence to care for and meet the needs of the child, and
**ii. the appropriateness of making an order that would require persons in respect of whom the order would apply to cooperate on issues affecting the child; and
*(k) any civil or criminal proceeding, order, condition, or measure that is relevant to the safety, security and well-being of the child.
The updated DA will also set out the required contents of a parenting order (16.1(4)). A parenting order will allocate parenting time—and, correspondingly day-to-day decision-making responsibilities—and may include a schedule and permitted means of communication between a child and a person with parenting responsibilities. Parenting orders submitted by the parties must be mutually agreed to when submitted, though a court may modify according to the best interests of the child.




{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters1-7}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters1-7}}
5,109

edits

Navigation menu