5,109
edits
Difference between revisions of "Dispute Resolution in Residential Tenancies (19:X)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dispute Resolution in Residential Tenancies (19:X) (view source)
Revision as of 07:18, 30 December 2020
, 07:18, 30 December 2020→2. Direct Request
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
Once an Order of Possession has been given to the landlord and served to the tenant after a wrongful Direct Request, the tenant should tell the landlord that they are reviewing it, so the landlord can't get writ from BC Supreme Court; The tenant should file a Review Application to the RTB on the basis of landlord fraud and/or inability to attend original hearing (See '''Section XI. E: Review of Arbitrator’s Decision'''). | Once an Order of Possession has been given to the landlord and served to the tenant after a wrongful Direct Request, the tenant should tell the landlord that they are reviewing it, so the landlord can't get writ from BC Supreme Court; The tenant should file a Review Application to the RTB on the basis of landlord fraud and/or inability to attend original hearing (See '''Section XI. E: Review of Arbitrator’s Decision'''). | ||
Similarly, a tenant may make a Direct Request for an order of possession and/or monetary order for outstanding deposit(s) when they gave the landlord their forwarding address in writing at the end of the tenancy, and, within 15 days after the receipt of the forwarding address, the landlord has not returned the outstanding deposit(s) or made an application to retain part or all of the deposit. See https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/housing-tenancy/residential-tenancies/apply-online/tenants-direct-request#:~:text=A%20tenant%20can%20use%20a,of%20their%20deposit(s). for more details. | |||
===''' 3. The Dispute Resolution Hearing '''=== | ===''' 3. The Dispute Resolution Hearing '''=== | ||