Difference between revisions of "Starting a Small Claim (20:V)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 13, 2020}}
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 5, 2021}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = smallclaims}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = smallclaims}}


As of June 1, 2017, the Civil Resolution Tribunal now has jurisdiction for small claims matters of $5000 or less. If you are wanting to bring a claim for between $5001 – 35,000, then it should be brought through Small Claims Court.  
As of June 1, 2017, the Civil Resolution Tribunal now has jurisdiction for small claims matters of $5,000 or less. If you are wanting to bring a claim for between $5,001 – 35,000, then it should be brought through Small Claims Court. Directions for filings were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the filing restrictions have since been removed. For current information, visit https://www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/COVID19. Conversely, the CRT is fully functional and remained so throughout the pandemic.


Directions for filings have been significantly affected by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Restrictions the provincial court registry placed on the services provided and documents that could be filed were removed on July 13, 2020. Because of the fluid public health situation, the functioning of small claims proceedings is subject to ongoing change. For the latest updates, we recommend you contract the court registry or visit: https://www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/COVID19.
== A. Pronouns ==


Conversely, the CRT is fully functional and remained so throughout the pandemic.
Both the BC Supreme Court (“BCSC”) and BC Provincial Court (“BCPC”) have issued practice directives regarding the form of address for parties and counsel in proceedings, effective December 16, 2020. The changes support a shift in professional practice towards asking all people how they should be respectfully addressed. A link to the BCSC practice direction can be found here: [https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bccourts.ca%2Fsupreme_court%2Fpractice_and_procedure%2Fpractice_directions%2Fcivil%2FPD-59_Forms_of_Address_for_Parties_and_Counsel_in_Proceedings.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cmpomponio%40lslap.bc.ca%7Cfd1a1c4270da4286a21808d9321c3db1%7Cd4bec773a2bd42bf80170ee22f61bc95%7C0%7C0%7C637595919155342139%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=gCTeq5yOuQy3a%2FGQgFbl4VJVRLsWEA8wJ0SviKzdDfM%3D&reserved=0 PD-59_Forms_of_Address_for_Parties_and_Counsel_in_Proceedings.pdf (bccourts.ca)]. A link to the PCSC practice direction can be found here: [https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.provincialcourt.bc.ca%2Fdownloads%2FPractice%2520Directions%2FNP%252024%2520Form%2520of%2520Address%2520for%2520Parties%2520and%2520Lawyers.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cmpomponio%40lslap.bc.ca%7Cfd1a1c4270da4286a21808d9321c3db1%7Cd4bec773a2bd42bf80170ee22f61bc95%7C0%7C0%7C637595919155342139%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=QBsOlRhraXePmbRETS3qebMuzdh5NBYfIbAGGNlBbtY%3D&reserved=0 NP 24 Form of Address for Parties and Lawyers.pdf (provincialcourt.bc.ca)]. For example, at the beginning of any in-person or virtual proceeding, when parties are introducing themselves, or lawyers are introducing themselves, their client, witness, or another individual, they should provide the judge or justice with each person’s name, title (e.g. “Mr./Ms./Mx./Counsel Jones”) and pronouns to be used in the proceeding. If a party or counsel do not provide this information in their introduction, they will be prompted by a court clerk to provide this information.


== A. Settlement Letter ==
At the CRT, the staff follows a similar procedure by asking all parties to identify their preferred pronouns and form of address (e.g. “Mr./Ms./Mx./Counsel Jones”). The CRT works with LGBTQ+ organizations to ensure that it approaches this issue in a respectful and inclusive way that is free of assumptions.
 
== B. Settlement Letter ==


The fastest and least expensive way to resolve a dispute is to tell the other person what you are claiming from them and why you are claiming  it. If the other person agrees with the amount or responds in a manner that leads to a settlement, both  parties will save the time, effort, expense, and uncertainty of a lawsuit.  
The fastest and least expensive way to resolve a dispute is to tell the other person what you are claiming from them and why you are claiming  it. If the other person agrees with the amount or responds in a manner that leads to a settlement, both  parties will save the time, effort, expense, and uncertainty of a lawsuit.  
Line 14: Line 16:
''Bona fide'' attempts to settle may involve concessions and admissions of liability. For example, a claimant may offer to settle for less than the claim to account for the cost, time investment, and risk of going to trial. A defendant, for example, may admit liability but dispute the  amount owed. Whenever parties can agree on certain points, the likelihood of settlement increases.  
''Bona fide'' attempts to settle may involve concessions and admissions of liability. For example, a claimant may offer to settle for less than the claim to account for the cost, time investment, and risk of going to trial. A defendant, for example, may admit liability but dispute the  amount owed. Whenever parties can agree on certain points, the likelihood of settlement increases.  


Because of the strong public interest in settlement, these ''bona fide'' settlement attempts are protected by settlement privilege. This means that, if the matter is not settled, any reductions in the claim or admissions made disappear and cannot be used against the party who made them (See ''[http://canlii.ca/t/gb4m0 Schetky v Cochrane]'', [1918] 1 WWR 821 (BCCA); ''[http://canlii.ca/t/gwdv3 Greenwood v Fitts]'' (1961), 29 DLR (2d) 260 (BCCA)). It is prudent to include the words “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” in correspondence involving ''bona fide'' attempts to settle to indicate that the party sending the document wishes to rely on settlement privilege; settlement privilege will still apply, however, even if “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” is not included.  
Because of the strong public interest in settlement, these bona fide settlement attempts are protected by settlement privilege. This means that, if the matter is not settled, any reductions in the claim or admissions made disappear and cannot be used against the party who made them (''Schetky v Cochrane'', [1918] 1 WWR 821 (BCCA); ''Greenwood v Fitts'' (1961), 29 DLR (2d) 260 (BCCA)). It is prudent to include the words “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” in correspondence involving bona fide attempts to settle to indicate that the party sending the document wishes to rely on settlement privilege; settlement privilege will still apply, however, even if “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” is not included.


Settlement letters should be brief, factual, and clearly state the amount claimed even if that amount exceeds $25,000. Settlement letters should  have a courteous tone as a letter that invokes a hostile reaction from the recipient will be counter-productive. A party writing a settlement  letter should never threaten criminal or regulatory penalties; '''extortion is a criminal offence'''. If a settlement between the two parties is not successful, then you may consider drafting a notice of claim.
Settlement letters should be brief, factual, and clearly state the amount claimed even if that amount exceeds $25,000. Settlement letters should  have a courteous tone as a letter that invokes a hostile reaction from the recipient will be counter-productive. A party writing a settlement  letter should never threaten criminal or regulatory penalties; '''extortion is a criminal offence'''. If a settlement between the two parties is not successful, then you may consider drafting a notice of claim.


== B. Identifying the Defendant(s) ==
== C. Identifying the Defendant(s) ==


If a settlement letter is unsuccessful, parties will be required to file a Notice of Claim through Small Claims Court if the claim is for between $5,001 and $35,000; see Section V.E.: Drafting the Notice of Claim. If the amount claimed is $5,000 or less, a party will apply for CRT dispute resolution; see Section V.D: Civil Resolution Tribunal.
If a settlement letter is unsuccessful, parties will be required to file a Notice of Claim through Small Claims Court if the claim is for between $5,001 and $35,000; see Section V.E.: Drafting the Notice of Claim. If the amount claimed is $5,000 or less, a party will apply for CRT dispute resolution; see Section V.D: Civil Resolution Tribunal.
Line 24: Line 26:
When drafting a Notice of Claim and throughout the litigation process, it is important to stick to the '''relevant''' facts. Court is not a  forum for airing grievances that do not give rise to a claim. For example, in a claim for breach of contract, the fact that the defendant  acted rudely is generally not relevant to the claim. Including irrelevant facts confuses the issues, wastes time, raises tensions, and makes it more difficult to successfully prove the claim. A good rule to follow for each type of claim is to include '''only the facts necessary''' to satisfy the legal test for that type of claim; brief is better.  
When drafting a Notice of Claim and throughout the litigation process, it is important to stick to the '''relevant''' facts. Court is not a  forum for airing grievances that do not give rise to a claim. For example, in a claim for breach of contract, the fact that the defendant  acted rudely is generally not relevant to the claim. Including irrelevant facts confuses the issues, wastes time, raises tensions, and makes it more difficult to successfully prove the claim. A good rule to follow for each type of claim is to include '''only the facts necessary''' to satisfy the legal test for that type of claim; brief is better.  


It is important to make your cause of action (e.g., negligence, breach of contract, etc.), type of damages, and amount of damages very clear. Do not let the judge guess what you want.  
It is important to make your cause of action (i.e., negligence, breach of contract, etc.), type of damages, and amount of damages very clear. Do not let the judge guess what you want.  


=== 1. Suing a Business ===
=== 1. Suing a Business ===
Line 30: Line 32:
==== a) Corporation ====
==== a) Corporation ====


A corporation is a legal entity that is separate from its shareholders and employees. It is identified by a corporate designation such as   Incorporated, Limited, Corporation, their abbreviations Inc., Ltd., or Corp., or their French equivalent following the business name.  
A corporation is a legal entity that is separate from its shareholders and employees. It is identified by a corporate designation such as Incorporated, Limited, Corporation, their abbreviations Inc., Ltd., or Corp., or their French equivalent following the business name.  


A corporation may register a sole proprietorship or partnership and operate under that name. To sue such a company, a claimant should include both the corporate name and the name of the proprietorship or partnership: e.g., 0123456 BC Ltd. dba Joe’s Bakery. The letters dba stand for “doing business as”. Variations such as “coba” meaning “carrying on business as” are also acceptable.  
A corporation may register a sole proprietorship or partnership and operate under that name. To sue such a company, a claimant should include both the corporate name and the name of the proprietorship or partnership: i.e., 0123456 BC Ltd. dba Joe’s Bakery. The letters dba stand for “doing business as”. Variations such as “coba” meaning “carrying on business as” are also acceptable.  


A corporation can enter into contracts and can sue or be sued. Generally speaking, a corporation’s shareholders, officers, directors, and  employees are not liable for the actions or liabilities of the corporation or their own actions while acting within the scope of their office or employment. A person who feels that a shareholder, director, officer, or employee of a corporation might be liable should obtain legal advice.  
A corporation can enter into contracts and can sue or be sued. Generally speaking, a corporation’s shareholders, officers, directors, and  employees are not liable for the actions or liabilities of the corporation or their own actions while acting within the scope of their office or employment. A person who feels that a shareholder, director, officer, or employee of a corporation might be liable should obtain legal advice.  
Line 38: Line 40:
Corporations may be either provincially or federally incorporated. A federal company is incorporated under the ''Canada Business Corporations Act'', RSC 1985, c. C-44 [CBCA]. A BC corporation is incorporated under the ''Business  Corporations Act'', SBC 2002, c 57 [BCBCA].  Corporations may also be registered under the laws of the other provinces and territories.  
Corporations may be either provincially or federally incorporated. A federal company is incorporated under the ''Canada Business Corporations Act'', RSC 1985, c. C-44 [CBCA]. A BC corporation is incorporated under the ''Business  Corporations Act'', SBC 2002, c 57 [BCBCA].  Corporations may also be registered under the laws of the other provinces and territories.  


Because a corporation can have multiple locations, every corporation, including non-BCBCA corporations, doing business in BC must provide an address where it can be served with notices of claim and other important documents. A claimant must perform a company search to obtain the current registered address for the defendant corporation. (''Rule'' 1(2.1); ''Rule'' 5(2.1). See [[Small_Claims_Legislation_and_Resources_(20:App_E)|Appendix E]] for instructions on conducting a company search.) This address must be listed as the corporation’s address on the notice of claim form.
Because a corporation can have multiple locations, every corporation, including non-BCBCA corporations, doing business in BC must provide an address where it can be served with notices of claim and other important documents. A claimant must perform a company search to obtain the current registered address for the defendant corporation (''SCR'', Rule 1(2.1); and Rule 5(2.1)). This address must be listed as the corporation’s address on the notice of claim form.  


==== b) Partnership ====
==== b) Partnership ====
Line 80: Line 82:
=== 2. Suing a Person over 19 Years Old ===
=== 2. Suing a Person over 19 Years Old ===


Do not use titles such as Mr., Mrs. or Ms. Use full names, not initials (i.e., “Dr. D. Smith” should be “Doris Smith”). Claimants may sue more than one defendant if the claim against each defendant is related. Divide the “To” space in half and use one half for the name and address of each defendant; alternatively, the notice of claim [https://justice.gov.bc.ca/FilingAssistant/ filing assistant] makes it convenient to add multiple defendants.
Do not use titles such as Mr., Mrs. or Ms. Use full names, not initials (i.e., “Dr. D. Smith” should be “Doris Smith”). Claimants may sue more than one defendant if the claim against each defendant is related. Divide the “To” space in half and use one half for the name and address of each defendant; alternatively, the notice of claim filing assistant makes it convenient to add multiple defendants (see https://justice.gov.bc.ca/FilingAssistant/).


=== 3. Suing a Society ===
=== 3. Suing a Society ===


A society is a type of not-for-profit corporation registered pursuant to the ''Society Act'', RSBC 1996, c 433. The procedure and principles for suing a society are the same as for corporations. A company search is required to ascertain the society’s registered address (''Rule'' 1(2.2); ''Rule'' 5(2.2)).
A society is a type of not-for-profit corporation registered pursuant to the ''Societies Act'', SBC 2015, c 18. The procedure and principles for suing a society are the same as for corporations. A company search is required to ascertain the society’s registered address (''SCR'', Rule 1(2.2) and Rule 5(2.2)).


=== 4. Suing I.C.B.C. ===
=== 4. Suing I.C.B.C. ===
Line 98: Line 100:
Telephone: (604) 661-2233 or 1(800) 464-5050
Telephone: (604) 661-2233 or 1(800) 464-5050


'''Note: If a motor vehicle has caused personal injury or property damage or a claimant has been denied coverage by ICBC, refer to [[Introduction to ICBC Automobile Insurance (12:I)| Chapter 12 - ICBC Motor Vehicle Insurance]] and [[Introduction to Motor Vehicle Law (13:I)|Chapter 13 - Motor Vehicle Law]]. Claims involving motor vehicles and motor vehicle insurance can be  complicated; it is not possible to cover all possibilities in this Small Claims guide.'''
'''Note: If a motor vehicle has caused personal injury or property damage or a claimant has been denied coverage by ICBC, refer to '''Chapter 12: Automobile Insurance (ICBC)''' and '''Chapter 13: Motor Vehicle Law'''. Claims involving motor vehicles and motor vehicle insurance are currently complex and evolving. The constitutionality of the CRT having jurisdiction over minor injury determinations and claims fault and damage claims up to $50,000 is being appealed ([https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/sc/21/03/2021BCSC0348.htm ''Trial Lawyers’ Association of British Columbia v British Columbia (Attorney General)'', 2021 BCSC 348, at para 414]). In the meantime, people can proceed to either the CRT or the court. Get legal advice to determine which process is best for you. For more information, visit https://civilresolutionbc.ca/how-the-crt-works/getting-started/motor-vehicle-accidents-and-injuries/.
 
A claimant should be alert to the following:
*if the accident occurred after April 1st, 2019, the dispute resolution through the CRT will be available for damage claims up to $50,000, benefits disputes, fault determinations and “minor injury” determinations;
*a claim involving motor vehicle insurance may have a shorter limitation period;
*parties other than the driver (e.g., the owner of the vehicle) may also be liable;
*a lawsuit for Part 7 (No Fault) benefits should be filed if appropriate;
*ICBC may be liable if damage is caused by an unidentified (i.e., hit and run) (See ''Insurance (Vehicle) Act'', RSBC 1996, c 231, s 24), under, or uninsured motorist (''Insurance (Vehicle) Act'', RSBC 1996, c 231, s 20); and  
*personal injury claims are very difficult to value and it may be appropriate to consider bringing the claim in Supreme Court if the injuries are more than trivial.


Many personal injury lawyers work on a contingency basis. A claimant may wish to consult a personal injury lawyer prior to filing the claim to ensure that the amount claimed is reasonable and all parties are properly listed on the Notice of Claim.  
Many personal injury lawyers work on a contingency basis. A claimant may wish to consult a personal injury lawyer prior to filing the claim to ensure that the amount claimed is reasonable and all parties are properly listed on the Notice of Claim.


Whether or not ICBC is named as a defendant, in a claim for damages caused by a vehicle in British Columbia, a claimant '''must''' serve ICBC with a copy of the Notice of Claim and a blank Reply form in the same manner as serving a corporate defendant (''Insurance (Vehicle) Act'', RSBC 1996, c 231, s 22).  
Whether or not ICBC is named as a defendant, in a claim for damages caused by a vehicle in British Columbia, a claimant '''must''' serve ICBC with a copy of the Notice of Claim and a blank Reply form in the same manner as serving a corporate defendant (''Insurance (Vehicle) Act'', RSBC 1996, c 231, s 22).


Where ICBC is properly named as a defendant, its correct legal name is the '''Insurance Corporation of British Columbia'''. It is a special type of corporation and the usual corporate designation such as Inc. is not required.
Where ICBC is properly named as a defendant, its correct legal name is the '''Insurance Corporation of British Columbia'''. It is a special type of corporation and the usual corporate designation such as Inc. is not required.


=== 5. Suing the Government ===
=== 5. Suing the Government ===
Line 118: Line 112:
==== a) Federal Government ====
==== a) Federal Government ====


The federal government should be named as either “Attorney General of Canada” or “Her Majesty in right of Canada”. If an agency of the Crown is to be sued and '''if a federal Act permits''', the agency may be sued in the name of that agency. (See s 23(1) of the ''Crown Liability and Proceedings Act'', RSC 1985, c C-50; ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1f4rl Goodhead v The Law Society Of BC]'', 1997 CanLII 4299 (BC SC)).  
The federal government should be named as either “Attorney General of Canada” or “Her Majesty in right of Canada”. If an agency of the Crown is to be sued and '''if a federal Act permits''', the agency may be sued in the name of that agency; see ''Crown Liability and Proceedings Act'', RSC 1985, c C-50, s 23(1); [http://canlii.ca/t/1f4rl ''Goodhead v Law Society (British Columbia)'', [1997<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No. 1779 (BCSC)].


==== b) Provincial ====
==== b) Provincial ====


The provincial government should be named as “Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of British Columbia”. (See s 7 of the ''Crown Proceeding Act'', RSBC 1996, c 89).
The provincial government should be named as “Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of British Columbia” (''Crown Proceeding Act'', RSBC 1996, c 89, s 7).


It should be noted that the CRT cannot resolve disputes where the claim is against the government or the government is a party to the dispute. See Section IV. C.: Civil Resolution Tribunal for more information on the jurisdiction of the CRT.  
It should be noted that the CRT cannot resolve disputes where the claim is against the government or the government is a party to the dispute. See '''Section IV. C.: Civil Resolution Tribunal''' for more information on the jurisdiction of the CRT.  


=== 6. Suing the Police ===
=== 6. Suing the Police ===


The “Royal Canadian Mounted Police” is not a legal entity that can sue or be sued. (See ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1dtx9 Dixon v Deacon Morgan McEwen Easson]'', 1989 CanLII 2786 (BC SC)). A claimant who wishes to sue for damages arising from the conduct of a police officer should sue the individual police officers and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General. (See ''[http://canlii.ca/t/28lkh Amezcua v Taylor]'', 2010 BCCA 128 (CanLII); ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1jsn7 Roy v British Columbia (Attorney General)]'', 2005 BCCA 88 (CanLII)). A claimant who is suing a municipal police force should sue the individual police officers as well as the municipality employing the police officers. It is critical that a claimant provide written notice to the city within '''two months''' of the event giving rise to the cause of action. (See ''Local Government Act'', RSBC 1996, c 323, s 286(1)).
The “Royal Canadian Mounted Police” is not a legal entity that can sue or be sued ([http://canlii.ca/t/1dtx9 ''Dixon v Deacon Morgan McEwen Easson'', [1990<nowiki>]</nowiki> B.C.J. No. 1043 (BCSC)]. A claimant who wishes to sue for damages arising from the conduct of a police officer should sue the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General. The individual police officer and the Attorney General of Canada may be named in cases alleging gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the police officer ([http://canlii.ca/t/28lkh ''Amezcua v Taylor'', 2010 BCCA 128]; [http://canlii.ca/t/1jsn7 ''Roy v British Columbia (Attorney General)'', 2005 BCCA 88)]. The Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General is the proper defendant in a civil action involving the RCMP or RCMP members as of Dec 11, 2015 (''Order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council'', No. 762/2015).
 
RCMP officers are immune from liability for anything done in the performance of their duty except where the officer has been guilty of dishonesty, gross negligence, or malicious or willful misconduct, or the cause of action is libel or slander. See ''Police Act'', RSC 1996, c327, s 11 and s 21; ''Crown Liability and Proceedings Act'', RSC 1985, c. C-50, s 3 and s 10; [http://canlii.ca/t/g6ts5 ''Acumar Consulting Engineers Ltd. v The Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia (APEGBC)'', 2014 BCSC 814 at para 49].
 
A claimant who is suing a municipal police force should sue the individual police officers as well as the municipality employing the police officers.  


=== 7. Suing a Municipality ===
=== 7. Suing a Municipality ===


Municipalities are special corporations incorporated by letters patent. A municipality means, in relation to a regional district, a municipality in the regional district and, in the case of the Metro Vancouver Regional District, includes the City of Vancouver (See ''Local Government Act'', RSBC 2015, c 1, Schedule - s 1). When letters patent are issued, the name of the incorporated municipality is published in the BC Gazette (See ''Local Government Act'', RSBC 2015, c 1, s 780(1)(a)). A claimant should search the BC Gazette to obtain the legal name of the municipality.
Municipalities are special corporations incorporated by letters patent. A municipality means, in relation to a regional district, a municipality in the regional district and, in the case of the Metro Vancouver Regional District, includes the City of Vancouver (''Local Government Act'', RSBC 2015, c 1, Schedule, s 1). When letters patent are issued, the name of the incorporated municipality is published in the [https://www.crownpub.bc.ca/Home/Gazette BC Gazette] (''Local Government Act'', RSBC 2015, c 1, s 780(1)(a)). A claimant should search the BC Gazette to obtain the legal name of the municipality.


It is critical that a claimant provide written notice to the city within '''two months''' of the time, place and manner in which the damage has been sustained. As well, all legal actions must be commenced within 6 months after the cause of action first arose (See ''Local Government Act, RSBC 2015, c 1, ss 735 and 736). For more information, please see [[Introduction to Public Complaints (5:I)|Chapter 15 - Public Complaints]].
It is critical that a claimant provide written notice to the city within ''two months'' of the time, place, and manner in which the damage has been sustained. As well, all legal actions must be commenced within 6 months after the cause of action first arose (''Local Government Act'', RSBC 2005, c 1, s 735, s 736). For more information, please see '''Chapter 5: Public Complaints'''.


=== 8. Suing a Young or Mentally Incompetent Person ===
=== 8. Suing a Young or Mentally Incompetent Person ===


A minor, also called an infant, is a person who is under 19 years of age at the time the claim is filed. Mentally incompetent persons as well as minors are persons with a legal disability. When suing such persons, the following rules of the ''Supreme Court Civil Rules'', BC Reg 168/2009 [SCCR] apply:  
A minor, also called an infant, is a person who is under 19 years of age at the time the claim is filed. Mentally incompetent persons, as well as minors, are persons with a legal disability. When suing such persons, the following rules of the ''Supreme Court Civil Rules'', BC Reg 168/2009 [SCCR] apply:  
 
*Rule 4-3 (2)(f) for serving documents by personal service;
*Rule 4-3 (2)(f) for serving documents by personal service;
*Rule 7-2 (9) for examination of mentally incompetent persons for discovery
*Rule 7-2 (9) for examination of mentally incompetent persons for discovery
Line 144: Line 143:
*Rule 20-2(8) for the lawyer for a person under disability  
*Rule 20-2(8) for the lawyer for a person under disability  
*Rule 20-2(10) if a party to a proceeding becomes a mentally incompetent person
*Rule 20-2(10) if a party to a proceeding becomes a mentally incompetent person
*Rule 25-2 (10) and (11) when delivering notice of applying for an estate grant or for the resealing of a foreign grant in relation to the estate
*Rule 25-2 (10) and (11) when delivering notice of applying for an estate grant or for the resealing of a foreign grant in relation to the estate.


Persons with a legal disability must be represented by a litigation guardian (See SCCR, Rule 20-2(2)).   With some limitations, a litigation guardian can be any person ordinarily resident in British Columbia.
Persons with a legal disability must be represented by a litigation guardian (''Supreme Court Civil Rules'', BC Reg 168/2009, Rule 20-2(2)). With some limitations, a litigation guardian can be any person ages 19 years or older who is ordinarily resident in British Columbia. The litigation guardian must complete and submit the Litigation Guardian Declaration form (''CRT Rules (effective May 1, 2021)'', Rule 1.13(2)).  


If the claim involves personal injury, SCCR Rule 20-2(4) applies and requires that the litigation guardian act by a lawyer unless the litigation guardian is the Public Guardian and Trustee.
If the claim involves personal injury, SCCR Rule 20-2(4) applies and requires that the litigation guardian act by a lawyer unless the litigation guardian is the Public Guardian and Trustee.


A party cannot take a step in default against a person with a legal disability without the court’s permission. A settlement with a party under a legal disability is not binding unless the court approves it.
A party cannot take a step in default against a person with a legal disability without the court’s permission. A settlement with a party under a legal disability is not binding unless the court approves it.


=== 9. Suing an Insurance Company other than ICBC ===
=== 9. Suing an Insurance Company other than ICBC ===
Line 158: Line 157:
=== 10. Suing an Unknown Person ===
=== 10. Suing an Unknown Person ===


If a claimant does not know the identity of one or more parties, the claimant can still file a claim using a misnomer. For example, the claimant would list the unidentified defendant as either John Doe or Jane Doe as the case may be. If there are multiple unknown parties, the claimant could add a number to each misnomer (e.g., John Doe 1; John Doe 2). Misnomer also applies to unknown companies.  
If a claimant does not know the identity of one or more parties, the claimant can still file a claim using a misnomer. For example, the claimant would list the unidentified defendant as either John Doe or Jane Doe as the case may be. If there are multiple unknown parties, the claimant could add a number to each misnomer (e.g., John Doe 1; John Doe 2). Misnomer also applies to unknown companies.  


A claimant should research the law surrounding misnomer and ensure that both the unidentified party and its actions are described in as much detail as possible.  
A claimant should research the law surrounding misnomers and ensure that both the unidentified party and its actions are described in as much detail as possible.  


If the party is unknown because of a motor vehicle hit and run, the claimant may sue ICBC as a nominal defendant.
If the party is unknown because of a motor vehicle hit and run, the claimant may sue ICBC as a nominal defendant.


== C. Can the Defendant(s) Pay? ==
== D. Can the Defendant(s) Pay? ==


One cannot squeeze blood from a stone. If a defendant has insignificant assets or income, the defendant may have no means to pay a judgment; such a person is “judgment-proof” and a claimant with an uncollectible judgment is said to be holding an “empty judgment”. A claimant should consider whether it is worth the time, expense, and stress of suing a judgment-proof defendant.
One cannot squeeze blood from a stone. If a defendant has insignificant assets or income, the defendant may have no means to pay a judgment; such a person is “judgment-proof” and a claimant with an uncollectible judgment is said to be holding an “empty judgment”. A claimant should consider whether it is worth the time, expense, and stress of suing a judgment-proof defendant.


A judgment is enforceable for ten years after it is issued (See ''Limitation Act'', RSBC 1996, c 266; ''Limitation Act'', SBC 2012, c 13, s 7);  after this time, unless it is renewed, the judgment expires and becomes uncollectible. On some occasions, a previously judgment-proof defendant will “come into money” by receiving an inheritance or winning the lottery. This is a rare occurrence and a claimant must invest time and effort to monitor the defendant’s circumstances over the ten years that the judgment is enforceable. A more common change in a judgment-proof defendant’s circumstances is the defendant securing a higher-paying job.  
A judgment is enforceable for ten years after it is issued (''Limitation Act'', RSBC 1996, c 266, s 7; ''Limitation Act'', SBC 2012, c 13, s 7). After this time, unless it is renewed, the judgment expires and becomes uncollectible. On some occasions, a previously judgment-proof defendant will “come into money” by receiving an inheritance or winning the lottery. This is a rare occurrence and a claimant must invest time and effort to monitor the defendant’s circumstances over the ten years that the judgment is enforceable. A more common change in a judgment-proof defendant’s circumstances is the defendant securing a higher-paying job.  


A claimant should also consider the likelihood of the defendant going bankrupt. If the defendant goes bankrupt, the claimant may recover little or none of the amount of the judgment. For more detail on bankruptcy, see “Enforcement of a Judgment”.  
A claimant should also consider the likelihood of the defendant going bankrupt. If the defendant goes bankrupt, the claimant may recover little or none of the amount of the judgment. For more detail on bankruptcy, see “Enforcement of a Judgment”.  


A claimant must decide whether or not to sue before the limitation period expires. If the limitation period expires, a claimant cannot later sue on that cause of action if the defendant’s circumstances change.
A claimant must decide whether or not to sue before the limitation period expires. If the limitation period expires, a claimant cannot later sue on that cause of action if the defendant’s circumstances change.


== D. Civil Resolution Tribunal ==
== E. Civil Resolution Tribunal ==


The Civil Resolution Tribunal is designed to facilitate dispute resolution in a way that is accessible, speedy, economical and flexible for amounts $5,000 and under. It relies heavily on electronic communication tools. It focuses on resolution by agreement of the parties first, and by the Tribunal’s binding decisions if no agreement is reached. Thus, there are several steps to the CRT process before actually applying for dispute resolution with the tribunal.
The Civil Resolution Tribunal is designed to facilitate dispute resolution in a way that is accessible, speedy, economical, and flexible for amounts of $5,000 and under. It relies heavily on electronic communication tools. It focuses on a resolution by agreement of the parties first, and by the Tribunal’s binding decisions if no agreement is reached. Thus, there are several steps to the CRT process before actually applying for dispute resolution with the tribunal.


=== 1. Self Help ===
=== 1. Self Help ===


A claimant must first attempt to resolve the dispute using the tribunal’s online dispute resolution services. The claimant may use the website’s resources to gather information and diagnose their claim.  
A claimant must first attempt to resolve the dispute using the tribunal’s online dispute resolution services. The claimant may use the website’s resources to gather information and diagnose their claim.  


==== a) Solution Explorer ====
==== a) Solution Explorer ====


The Solution Explorer, available on the CRT website, includes free legal information and self-help tools, such as guided pathways, interactive questions and answers, tools, templates and other resources. Applicants can apply to the CRT for dispute resolution right from the Solution Explorer.   
The Solution Explorer, available on the CRT website, includes free legal information and self-help tools, such as guided pathways, interactive questions and answers, tools, templates, and other resources. Applicants can apply to the CRT for dispute resolution right from the Solution Explorer.   


Small Claims Solution Explorer website:
Small Claims Solution Explorer website:
Line 203: Line 202:
If a claimant’s attempt at online dispute resolution has been unsuccessful, the claimant must formally request resolution of the claim through the tribunal and pay all required fees.  A claimant cannot request tribunal resolution if there is a court proceeding or other legally binding process to resolve the claim and a hearing or trial in that court or other legally binding process has been scheduled or has occurred to decide that claim. During the case management phase, the case manager will attempt to facilitate a settlement between the parties by clarifying the claim, providing facilitated mediation, and asking the parties to exchange evidence. If the dispute is not resolved during facilitation, the case manager will help prepare the parties for the tribunal decision process.
If a claimant’s attempt at online dispute resolution has been unsuccessful, the claimant must formally request resolution of the claim through the tribunal and pay all required fees.  A claimant cannot request tribunal resolution if there is a court proceeding or other legally binding process to resolve the claim and a hearing or trial in that court or other legally binding process has been scheduled or has occurred to decide that claim. During the case management phase, the case manager will attempt to facilitate a settlement between the parties by clarifying the claim, providing facilitated mediation, and asking the parties to exchange evidence. If the dispute is not resolved during facilitation, the case manager will help prepare the parties for the tribunal decision process.


If parties do not resolve the claim during the case management phase, the claim will proceed by tribunal hearing (Civil Resolution Tribunal Act, SBC 2012, c 25, s 30 [CRTA]). If a party to a dispute fails to comply with an order of the tribunal made during the case management phase, the case manager may (after giving notice to the non-compliant party) refer the dispute to the tribunal for resolution, where the tribunal will: a) proceed to hear the dispute; b) make an order dismissing a claim in the dispute that is made by the non-compliant party; or c) refuse to resolve a claim of the non-compliant party or refuse to resolve the dispute.  
If parties do not resolve the claim during the case management phase, the claim will proceed by tribunal hearing (''CRTA'', s 30). If a party to a dispute fails to comply with an order of the tribunal made during the case management phase, the case manager may (after giving notice to the non-compliant party) refer the dispute to the tribunal for resolution, where the tribunal will: (a) proceed to hear the dispute; (b) make an order dismissing a claim in the dispute that is made by the non-compliant party; or (c) refuse to resolve a claim of the non-compliant party or refuse to resolve the dispute (''CRTA'', s 36).  


Despite the consent of both parties, the tribunal retains authority to refuse to resolve a claim or dispute and may exercise this authority at any point before making a final decision resolving the dispute. The general authority for refusing to resolve a claim or dispute is set out in CRTA s 11.
Despite the consent of both parties, the tribunal retains the authority to refuse to resolve a claim or dispute and may exercise this authority at any point before making a final decision resolving the dispute. The general authority for refusing to resolve a claim or dispute is set out in CRTA s 11.


==== a) Applying for Dispute Resolution ====
==== a) Applying for Dispute Resolution ====
Line 214: Line 213:


===== (1) Application Costs and Where to Apply =====
===== (1) Application Costs and Where to Apply =====
Applications may be made online or a paper application form can be found online at https://civilresolutionbc.ca/resources/forms/#apply-for-crt-dispute-resolution. Fees vary slightly by method of application. The cost to apply for dispute resolution online is $75-125, while the cost by paper application is $100-150.
Applications may be made online or a paper application form can be found online at https://civilresolutionbc.ca/resources/forms/#apply-for-crt-dispute-resolution. Fees vary slightly by the method of application. The cost to apply for dispute resolution online is $75-125, while the cost by paper application is $100-150.


If you are using a paper application, it may be sent to the CRT by mail to:  
If you are using a paper application, it may be sent to the CRT by mail to:  
Line 223: Line 222:
===== (2) After an Application is Received =====
===== (2) After an Application is Received =====
After an initial review of the Dispute Application Form, the tribunal will provide to the applicant one of the following:  
After an initial review of the Dispute Application Form, the tribunal will provide to the applicant one of the following:  
*a request for more information about the application;
* a request for more information about the application;
*a Dispute Notice to provide to each respondent; or
* a Dispute Notice to provide to each respondent; or
*an explanation as to why the Dispute Notice will not be issued
* an explanation as to why the Dispute Notice will not be issued


Once a Dispute Notice is issued by the tribunal the applicant must:
Once a Dispute Notice is issued by the tribunal the applicant must:
*provide a Dispute Notice and a blank Dispute Response Form to every respondent named in the dispute within 90 days from the day the Dispute Notice is issued by  
* provide a Dispute Notice and a blank Dispute Response Form to every respondent named in the dispute within 90 days from the day the Dispute Notice is issued by  
*complete the Proof of Notice Form;
* complete the Proof of Notice Form;
*provide the completed Proof of Notice Form to the tribunal within 10 days of providing notice; and
* provide the completed Proof of Notice Form to the tribunal within 10 days of providing notice; and
*provide any other information or evidence about the Dispute Notice or notice process requested by the tribunal.  
* provide any other information or evidence about the Dispute Notice or notice process requested by the tribunal.  


===== (3) Providing Notice to, or Serving, the Respondents =====
===== (3) Providing Notice to, or Serving, the Respondents =====
Line 239: Line 238:
*provide any other information or evidence about the Dispute Notice or service process requested by the tribunal
*provide any other information or evidence about the Dispute Notice or service process requested by the tribunal


A Dispute Notice can be served on a respondent by e-mail, registered mail, courier delivery requiring a signature, or personal delivery. Notice by e-mail is acceptable proof that the notice requirements are met only if the respondent confirms receipt by sending a reply by e-mail to the applicant by the date shown on the Dispute Notice. Additional rules regarding notice delivery and when notice is considered accepted, can be found here: https://civilresolutionbc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CRT-Rules-in-force-May-1-2020.pdf.
A Dispute Notice can be served on a respondent by e-mail, registered mail, courier delivery requiring a signature, or personal delivery. Notice by e-mail is acceptable proof that the notice requirements are met only if the respondent replies to the email, contacts the CRT about the dispute, or confirms receipt of the Dispute Notice in some other way. See the CRT on Dispute Resolution at https://civilresolutionbc.ca/tribunal-process/starting-a-dispute/dispute-notice/#3-serve-the-dispute-notice-and-instructions-for-response-on-each-respondent. Additional rules regarding notice delivery and when notice is considered accepted can be found here: https://civilresolutionbc.ca/tribunal-process/starting-a-dispute/dispute-notice/.


If you have unsuccessfully tried to deliver a Dispute Notice to a respondent, you should contact the CRT to request an alternative method of delivery.  
If you have unsuccessfully tried to deliver a Dispute Notice to a respondent, you should contact the CRT to request an alternative method of delivery.  
Line 253: Line 252:
An applicant must also provide the Dispute Notice to the respondent or the person with whom the respondent normally resides, and the Public Guardian and Trustee.
An applicant must also provide the Dispute Notice to the respondent or the person with whom the respondent normally resides, and the Public Guardian and Trustee.


===== (3) Companies defined by the Business Corporations Act =====
===== (3) Companies defined by the ''Business Corporations Act'' =====
An applicant can serve these parties by the following methods:  
An applicant can serve these parties by the following methods:  
*by registered mail, courier delivery requiring a signature or delivery in person to the address shown for the registered office with the Registrar of Companies;  
*by registered mail, courier delivery requiring a signature or delivery in person to the address shown for the registered office with the Registrar of Companies;  
*by delivery in person at the place of business of the company, to a receptionist or a person who appears to manage or control the company’s business there;  
*by delivery in person at the place of business of the company, to a receptionist or a person who appears to manage or control the company’s business there;  
*by delivery in person to a director, officer, liquidator, trustee in bankruptcy or receiver manager of the company.
*by delivery in person to a director, officer, liquidator, trustee in bankruptcy or receiver-manager of the company (''Business Corporations Act'', SBC 2002, c 57).


===== (4) Extraprovincial Corporation defined by the Business Corporations Act =====
===== (4) Extraprovincial Corporation defined by the ''Business Corporations Act'' =====
An applicant can serve these parties by the following methods:  
An applicant can serve these parties by the following methods:  
*by registered mail, courier delivery requiring a signature or delivery in person to the address shown for the head office in the office of the Registrar of Companies if that head office is in British Columbia;  
*by registered mail, courier delivery requiring a signature or delivery in person to the address shown for the head office in the office of the Registrar of Companies if that head office is in British Columbia;  
Line 265: Line 264:
*by delivery in person to a director, officer, liquidator, trustee in bankruptcy or receiver-manager of the extraprovincial company.
*by delivery in person to a director, officer, liquidator, trustee in bankruptcy or receiver-manager of the extraprovincial company.


===== (5) Society incorporated under the Societies Act =====  
===== (5) Society incorporated under the ''Societies Act'' =====  
An applicant can serve these parties by the following methods:  
An applicant can serve these parties by the following methods:  
*by registered mail, courier delivery requiring a signature or delivery in person to the address for service with the Registrar of Companies;  
*by registered mail, courier delivery requiring a signature or delivery in person to the address for service with the Registrar of Companies;  
*by delivery in person to a director, officer, receiver manager or liquidator of the society.
*by delivery in person to a director, officer, receiver manager or liquidator of the society (''Societies Act'', SBC 2015, c. 18, s 252).


===== (6) Partnerships =====
===== (6) Partnerships =====
Line 285: Line 284:
==== c) Negotiation and Facilitation ====
==== c) Negotiation and Facilitation ====


The purpose of the case management phase is to facilitate an agreement between the parties and to prepare for the tribunal hearing should it be required. The Preparation for Tribunal Hearing phase may be conducted at the same time as the Facilitated Dispute Resolution phase.
The purpose of the case management phase is to facilitate an agreement between the parties and to prepare for the tribunal hearing should it be required. The Preparation for Tribunal Hearing phase may be conducted at the same time as the Facilitated Dispute Resolution phase.
 
A case manager will determine which processes are appropriate for a particular dispute and has the authority to require the parties to participate. They can adjust or modify the facilitation directions at any time during facilitation. Negotiation and facilitation may be conducted in person, in writing, by telephone, via videoconferencing, via email, via other electronic communication tools, or a combination of these methods.  These negotiations will be mediated by the case manager.
A case manager will determine which processes are appropriate for a particular dispute and has the authority to require the parties to participate. They can adjust or modify the facilitation directions at any time during facilitation. Negotiation and facilitation may be conducted in person, in writing, by telephone, via videoconferencing, via email, via other electronic communication tools, or a combination of these methods.  These negotiations will be mediated by the case manager.
The case manager can direct any party in a dispute to provide to the tribunal and to every other party any information and evidence, including explanations of that information or evidence, information about a party’s ability to pay an amount reached by agreement or ordered by the tribunal, responses to another party’s information and communications, and that party’s position on any proposed resolution of a claim in the dispute. During facilitation, the facilitator can refer any matter requiring a decision or order to a tribunal member, including a party’s non-compliance with directions. The information shared during facilitated mediation is confidential and is generally not allowed to be included in the Tribunal Decision Plan.
The case manager can direct any party in a dispute to provide to the tribunal and to every other party any information and evidence, including explanations of that information or evidence, information about a party’s ability to pay an amount reached by agreement or ordered by the tribunal, responses to another party’s information and communications, and that party’s position on any proposed resolution of a claim in the dispute. During facilitation, the facilitator can refer any matter requiring a decision or order to a tribunal member, including a party’s non-compliance with directions. The information shared during facilitated mediation is confidential and is generally not allowed to be included in the Tribunal Decision Plan, unless it is relevant evidence that would be disclosed in any event.
 
If the parties reach a resolution by agreement on any or all of the claims in their dispute, they can ask the tribunal to make a consent resolution order to make the terms of their agreement an order of the tribunal, and pay the required fee. If the parties agree to resolve some, but not all, claims by agreement, the case manager can record their draft agreement based on the terms agreed upon by the parties, and provide a draft consent resolution order to a tribunal member immediately, or along with the Tribunal Decision Plan.
If the parties reach a resolution by agreement on any or all of the claims in their dispute, they can ask the tribunal to make a consent resolution order to make the terms of their agreement an order of the tribunal, and pay the required fee. If the parties agree to resolve some, but not all, claims by agreement, the case manager can record their draft agreement based on the terms agreed upon by the parties, and provide a draft consent resolution order to a tribunal member immediately, or along with the Tribunal Decision Plan.
If the case manager decides the parties cannot resolve their dispute by agreement, they will inform the parties that activities aimed at finding a resolution by agreement are over and ask the applicant to pay the tribunal decision fee. If the applicant does not pay the tribunal decision fee, a respondent can pay it. If no party pays the tribunal decision fee within the time period set by the case manager, the tribunal may refuse to resolve or dismiss the dispute. If a party pays the tribunal decision fee, the process to prepare the dispute for a tribunal decision will begin.
If the case manager decides the parties cannot resolve their dispute by agreement, they will inform the parties that activities aimed at finding a resolution by agreement are over and ask the applicant to pay the tribunal decision fee. If the applicant does not pay the tribunal decision fee, a respondent can pay it. If no party pays the tribunal decision fee within the time period set by the case manager, the tribunal may refuse to resolve or dismiss the dispute. If a party pays the tribunal decision fee, the process to prepare the dispute for a tribunal decision will begin.


==== d) Preparation for Tribunal Hearing ====
==== d) Preparation for Tribunal Hearing ====


If the negotiation and facilitation process does not result in a settlement, the case manager will assist the parties in preparing for adjudication by ensuring the parties understand each other’s positions and by directing the exchange of evidence. Most of this exchange and communication will occur online. To prepare the dispute for a tribunal decision, the case manager can support the parties in identifying and narrowing the claims or issues that will be decided in the tribunal decision process, identifying the facts relevant to resolving the claims or issues in the tribunal decision process, and taking any other steps to prepare for the tribunal decision process.  
If the negotiation and facilitation process does not result in a settlement, the case manager will assist the parties in preparing for adjudication by ensuring the parties understand each other’s positions and by directing the exchange of evidence. Generally, this exchange and communication will occur online. To prepare the dispute for a tribunal decision, the case manager can support the parties in identifying and narrowing the claims or issues that will be decided in the tribunal decision process, identifying the facts relevant to resolving the claims or issues in the tribunal decision process, and taking any other steps to prepare for the tribunal decision process.  


As well, the case manager will give the parties a Tribunal Decision Plan, which sets out required information, steps, and timelines to prepare the dispute for the tribunal decision process. Parties must include in the Tribunal Decision Plan all relevant evidence they possess regarding their claim, including evidence which does not support their position . Common kinds of evidence include photos or videos, contracts, correspondence regarding the dispute, and statements from witnesses or experts. All evidence and materials relied on must be translated into English . More information about evidence can be found at https://civilresolutionbc.ca/tribunal-process/starting-a-dispute/evidence/. In particular, the CRT has specific rules regarding expert evidence. See [[Small_Claims_Trial_Preparation_(20:XIII)#|Section XIII.B.: Expert Witnesses]].
As well, the case manager will give the parties a Tribunal Decision Plan, which sets out required information, steps, and timelines to prepare the dispute for the tribunal decision process. Parties must include in the Tribunal Decision Plan all relevant evidence they possess regarding their claim, including evidence that does not support their position (''CRTR'', Rule 8.1(1)). Common kinds of evidence include photos or videos, contracts, correspondence regarding the dispute, and statements from witnesses or experts. All evidence and materials relied on must be translated into English (''CRTR'', Rule 1.7(5)). More information about evidence can be found at https://civilresolutionbc.ca/tribunal-process/starting-a-dispute/evidence/. In particular, the CRT has specific rules regarding expert evidence. See '''Section XIII.B.: Expert Witnesses'''.


For motor vehicle injury claims, pertinent medical information should also be provided. Note that for this class of dispute there are limits on both the amount of expert evidence that can be submitted and the amount of money that the CRT can order one party to reimburse another for fees and expenses. A party wishing to adduce expert evidence to support a motor vehicle injury claim should consult https://civilresolutionbc.ca/expert-evidence-and-expenses-in-mva-personal-injury-disputes/ for more information. For strata disputes, copies of strata meeting minutes and any complain letters and/or bylaw infraction letters should be included in the Tribunal Decision Plan.
For motor vehicle injury claims, pertinent medical information should also be provided. Note that for this class of dispute there are limits on both the amount of expert evidence that can be submitted and the amount of money that the CRT can order one party to reimburse another for fees and expenses. A party wishing to adduce expert evidence to support a motor vehicle injury claim should consult https://civilresolutionbc.ca/expert-evidence-and-expenses-in-mva-personal-injury-disputes/ for more information. For strata disputes, copies of strata meeting minutes and any complaint letters and/or bylaw infraction letters should be included in the Tribunal Decision Plan.


Once the case manager has given the Tribunal Decision Plan to the parties, they cannot add any other party or claim without permission from the tribunal. The tribunal may at any time order that a party be added to the dispute and make directions as to the process to be followed.
Once the case manager has given the Tribunal Decision Plan to the parties, they cannot add any other party or claim without permission from the tribunal. The tribunal may at any time order that a party be added to the dispute and make directions as to the process to be followed.


If a party does not comply with the Tribunal Decision Plan the tribunal may do any of the following:  
If a party does not comply with the Tribunal Decision Plan the tribunal may do any of the following:  
*the tribunal can decide the dispute relying only on the information and evidence that was provided in compliance with the Tribunal Decision Plan;
* the tribunal can decide the dispute relying only on the information and evidence that was provided in compliance with the Tribunal Decision Plan;
*the tribunal can dismiss the claims brought by a party that did not comply with the Tribunal Decision Plan; and
* the tribunal can dismiss the claims brought by a party that did not comply with the Tribunal Decision Plan; and
*the tribunal can require the non-complying party to pay to another party any fees and other reasonable expenses that arose as a result of a party’s non-compliance with the Tribunal Decision Plan.  
* the tribunal can require the non-complying party to pay to another party any fees and other reasonable expenses that arose as a result of a party’s non-compliance with the Tribunal Decision Plan.  


Facilitation ends when the case manager determines that the Tribunal Decision Plan is complete.
Facilitation ends when the case manager determines that the Tribunal Decision Plan is complete.


== E. Drafting the Notice of Claim ==
== F. Drafting the Notice of Claim ==


The Notice of Claim is the document that starts an action in Small Claims Court. The Notice of Claim form is comprised of several sections and each section must be completed. The form can be either typed or handwritten. Hard copies are available from the court registry (See [[Small_Claims_Registries_(20:App_A)|Appendix A]]) and an electronic copy is [http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/justice/courthouse-services/documents-forms-records/court-forms/small-claims-forms available online].  
The Notice of Claim is the document that starts an action in Small Claims Court. The Notice of Claim form is comprised of several sections and each section must be completed. The form can be either typed or handwritten. Hard copies are available from the court registry (see [[Small_Claims_Registries_(20:App_A)|Appendix A]]) and an electronic copy is available online at http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/justice/courthouse-services/documents-forms-records/court-forms/small-claims-forms.


Where possible, a claimant should type the Notice of Claim form. A sample Notice of Claim is attached (See [[Sample_Notice_of_Claim_for_Small_Claims_(20:App_C)|Appendix C]]) and may be a helpful guideline when drafting a Notice of Claim.  
Where possible, a claimant should type the Notice of Claim form. A sample Notice of Claim (see [[Sample_Notice_of_Claim_for_Small_Claims_(20:App_C)|Appendix C]]) is attached and may be a helpful guideline when drafting a Notice of Claim.  


=== 1. “From” ===
=== 1. “From” ===


This section must contain the claimant’s full legal name, address, and telephone number. The claimant has an on-going duty to notify the court registry of any changes to the information in this section. Failure to provide the registry with current and accurate contact information may result in the claimant’s claim being dismissed and/or the claimant being liable for costs or penalties.  
This section must contain the claimant’s full legal name, address, and telephone number. The claimant has an ongoing duty to notify the court registry of any changes to the information in this section. Failure to provide the registry with current and accurate contact information may result in the claimant’s claim being dismissed and/or the claimant being liable for costs or penalties.  


=== 2. “To” ===
=== 2. “To” ===


The claimant must list the full legal name, address for service, and, if available, the telephone number for each defendant. If additional space is required, the claimant may attach a piece of paper listing this information for each defendant. Alternatively, the Notice of Claim [https://justice.gov.bc.ca/FilingAssistant/ filing assistant] can neatly add multiple defendants onto one Notice of Claim form.  
The claimant must list the full legal name, address for service, and, if available, the telephone number for each defendant. If additional space is required, the claimant may attach a piece of paper listing this information for each defendant. Alternatively, the Notice of Claim filing assistant (visit https://justice.gov.bc.ca/FilingAssistant/) can neatly add multiple defendants onto one Notice of Claim form.  


Failure to list the proper legal name of a defendant may result in the claimant’s claim against that defendant being dismissed or the judgment against that defendant being unenforceable. If the limitation period (see [[Limitation_Periods_(20:App_F) | Appendix F]]) has already expired,  the claimant may not be able to correct the error.  
Failure to list the proper legal name of a defendant may result in the claimant’s claim against that defendant being dismissed or the judgment against that defendant being unenforceable. If the limitation period has already expired, the claimant may not be able to correct the error (see [[Limitation_Periods_(20:App_F) | Appendix F]]).  


=== 3. “What Happened?” ===
=== 3. “What Happened?” ===
5,109

edits

Navigation menu