Difference between revisions of "Consumer Protection from Deceptive and Unconscionable Acts (11:IV)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 84: Line 84:
=== 1. Damages Recoverable by Consumers ===
=== 1. Damages Recoverable by Consumers ===


Under s 171 of the ''BPCPA'', a consumer may commence a civil action seeking damages for loss due to a deceptive or unconscionable act or practice. As with other civil actions, punitive damages or restitution may also be available. Small Claims Court may be used if the claim does not exceed $35,000.  
Under s 171 of the ''BPCPA'', a consumer may commence a civil action seeking damages for loss due to a deceptive or unconscionable act or practice. As with other civil actions, punitive damages or restitution may also be available. Small Claims Court may be used if the claim does not exceed $35,000 (''Small Claims Rules'', BC Reg 261/93, Rule 1(4)).  


=== 2. Transaction Unenforceable by Supplier ===
=== 2. Transaction Unenforceable by Supplier ===


Under s 10(1), where there is an unconscionable act or practice in a consumer transaction, that transaction is unenforceable by the supplier.
Under s 10(1), where there is an unconscionable act or practice in a consumer transaction, that transaction is unenforceable by the supplier.  


=== 3. Injunction, Declaration and Class Action ===
=== 3. Injunction, Declaration and Class Action ===


Under s 172, any person, whether or not that person has a special interest in or is affected by a consumer transaction, may bring an action seeking declaratory or injunctive relief. This involves seeking to have the court declare an act to be deceptive or unconscionable and to have the court grant an injunction restraining the supplier from engaging further in such acts. Under s 172(2) the Director may bring an action on behalf of consumers generally or a designated class of consumers.  
Under s 172, any person, whether or not that person has a special interest in or is affected by a consumer transaction, may bring an action seeking declaratory or injunctive relief. This involves seeking to have the court declare an act to be deceptive or unconscionable and to have the court grant an injunction restraining the supplier from engaging further in such acts. Under s 172(2) the Director may bring an action on behalf of consumers generally or a designated class of consumers.


The ''BPCPA'' stipulates that while the Provincial Court has jurisdiction for civil actions under s 171, actions under s 172 must be brought in Supreme Court.  
The ''BPCPA'' stipulates that while the Provincial Court has jurisdiction for civil actions under s 171, actions under s 172 must be brought in Supreme Court.  


For an example of a class action suit dealing with the ''BPCPA'', see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2006/2006bcca369/2006bcca369.html?autocompleteStr=Dahl%20v%20royal%20bank%20&autocompletePos=2 Dahl v Royal Bank of Canada]'', 2006 BCCA 369. Credit card debtors brought a class action suit against the Royal Bank of Canada, the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, and the Bank of Montreal. In the plaintiffs’ Statement of Claim, they asserted that the defendants failed to disclose the true cost of borrowing by providing the transaction dates for cash advances on their monthly statements rather than the posting dates (the dates the money was actually advanced), allowing more interest to be charged; the court, however, ultimately rejected this argument.  
For an example of a class action suit dealing with the ''BPCPA'', see [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2006/2006bcca369/2006bcca369.html?autocompleteStr=Dahl%20v%20royal%20bank%20&autocompletePos=2 ''Dahl v Royal Bank of Canada'', 2006 BCCA 369]. Credit card debtors brought a class action suit against the Royal Bank of Canada, the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, and the Bank of Montreal. In the plaintiffs’ Statement of Claim, they asserted that the defendants failed to disclose the true cost of borrowing by providing the transaction dates for cash advances on their monthly statements rather than the posting dates (the dates the money was actually advanced), allowing more interest to be charged; the court, however, ultimately rejected this argument.


In any action for permanent injunction under s 172(1)(b), the court may restore to any interested person any property or money acquired by deception or unconscionable acts or practices by the supplier (s 172(3)(a)), and may require the supplier to advertise to the public in a way that will assure prompt and reasonable communication to consumers (s 172(3)(c)).
In any action for a permanent injunction under s 172(1)(b), the court may restore to any interested person any property or money acquired by deception or unconscionable acts or practices by the supplier (s 172(3)(a)) and may require the supplier to advertise to the public in a way that will assure prompt and reasonable communication to consumers (s 172(3)(c)).


=== 4. Supplier Found Guilty of an Offence ===
=== 4. Supplier Found Guilty of an Offence ===


Under the ''BPCPA'' Section 189 creates a list of offences punishable by both fines and imprisonment, which may be sought by the Crown against a party found in breach of the BPCPA. Under s 190, an individual who commits an offence is liable to a fine of not more than $10,000, or to imprisonment for not more than 12 months, or to both.  
Under s 189 is a list of offences punishable by both fines and imprisonment, which may be sought by the Crown against a party found in breach of the ''BPCPA''. Under s 190, an individual who commits an offence under the ''BPCPA'' is liable to a fine of not more than $10,000, or to imprisonment for not more than 12 months, or to both.


== D. Limitation Period ==
== D. Limitation Period ==
5,109

edits

Navigation menu