Difference between revisions of "Complaints Concerning Police Conduct (5:V)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 84: Line 84:
===== (1) Retired Judge =====
===== (1) Retired Judge =====


Previously, only a police commissioner would review the file. However, complainants can now request that the Commissioner appoint a retired judge to review the file and determine whether or not the decision was correct (''Police Act'', s 117(1)). The complainant must make the request in writing within '''10 business days''' of receiving the discipline authority's decision (''Police Act'', s 117(2)). It is rare to have a retired judge review the file in less serious cases due to limited resources. Note that there is a more realistic chance of success when the Commission appoints a retired judge.  
Previously, only a police commissioner would review the file. However, complainants can now request that the Commissioner appoint a retired judge to review the file and determine whether or not the decision was correct (''Police Act'', s 117(1)). The complainant must make the request in writing within '''10 business days''' of receiving the discipline authority's decision (''Police Act'', s 117(2)). It is rare to have a retired judge review the file in less serious cases due to limited resources. There is a more realistic chance of success when the Commission appoints a retired judge.  


For further information, please see http://www.opcc.bc.ca.
For further information, please see http://www.opcc.bc.ca.


==== Public Hearing ====
==== Public Hearing ====

Navigation menu