Difference between revisions of "Benefit Period of Employment Insurance (8:V)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
== B. Antedating ==
== B. Antedating ==


If an application for EI benefits was not filed within the first four weeks after the week in which the claimant experienced their interruption of earnings inter, they can ask that the claim be antedated back to the first date when it could have been filed under s 10(4).  The claimant must establish that good cause existed for the delay in filing.  “Good cause” must be demonstrated for each day until the date of application was actually made.  If the claim is filed within the first four weeks, it is automatically antedated to the first date of eligibility.
If an application for EI benefits was not filed within the first four weeks after the week in which the claimant experienced their interruption of earnings, they can ask that the claim be antedated back to the first date when it could have been filed under s 10(4).  The claimant must establish that good cause existed for the delay in filing.  “Good cause” must be demonstrated for each day until the date of application was actually made.  If the claim is filed within the first four weeks, it is automatically antedated to the first date of eligibility.


:'''What is “Good Cause”?'''  Good cause has typically been interpreted narrowly. In one case, the applicant was in the hospital and the Commission denied his application for antedating on the grounds that his wife should have made the claim on his behalf.  Simple ignorance of the requirements of the EI Act has not been considered good cause either, though reasonable reliance on bad advice from the employer, union, a legal advisor or the Commission itself usually meets the requirements.
:'''What is “Good Cause”?'''  Good cause has typically been interpreted narrowly. Simple ignorance of the requirements of the EI Act has not been considered good cause either, though reasonable reliance on bad advice from the employer, union, a legal advisor or the Commission itself usually meets the requirements.


:In [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2012/2012fca139/2012fca139.html?autocompleteStr=FCA%20139&autocompletePos=2  ''Attorney General v Burke, 2012 FCA 139''], a claimant asked for his application to be back dated because he had expected to be rehired and hence did not apply for EI until after the regular deadline.  The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the previous decisions granting an antedate on the basis that the claimant had done what a reasonable person would do.
:In [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2012/2012fca139/2012fca139.html?autocompleteStr=FCA%20139&autocompletePos=2  ''Attorney General v Burke, 2012 FCA 139''], a claimant asked for his application to be back dated because he had expected to be rehired and hence did not apply for EI until after the regular deadline.  The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the previous decisions granting an antedate on the basis that the claimant had done what a reasonable person would do.
Line 40: Line 40:
*a) Disability pension or a lump sum or pension paid in full and final settlement of a claim made for workers’ compensation payments;
*a) Disability pension or a lump sum or pension paid in full and final settlement of a claim made for workers’ compensation payments;


*b) Payments under a sickness or disability wage-loss indemnity plan;
*b) Payments under a sickness or disability wage-loss indemnity plan that is not a group plan;


*c) Relief grants;
*c) Relief grants;
Line 48: Line 48:
For more details, see section 35(7) of the EI Regulations.
For more details, see section 35(7) of the EI Regulations.


Recent cases suggest that in certain circumstances some earnings may not delay the start of an EI claim. In ''Attorney General of Canada v Doreen Myers'', 2006 FCA 57, the court found that the claimant’s vacation pay did not delay the start of a claim because it was not a payment made by reason of a separation, thus allowing benefits to be received earlier, and possibly at a higher rate.  See also the case of ''Attorney General of Canada v Bielich'', 2005 FCA 363.  In this case the court allowed a $24,000 payment to be exempted from the claimant’s allocation of earnings because the purpose of the payment was to compensate the claimant for giving up his right to seek reinstatement, not to compensate for lost pay.
Recent cases suggest that in certain circumstances some earnings may not delay the start of an EI claim. In ''Attorney General of Canada v Bielich'', 2005 FCA 363, the court allowed a $24,000 payment to be exempted from the claimant’s allocation of earnings because the purpose of the payment was to compensate the claimant for giving up his right to seek reinstatement, not to compensate for lost pay.


:'''NOTE:''' A retirement pension will not delay the start of a claim.  Retirement pensions are generally considered income and are deducted from EI benefits.  However, if the claimant accumulates all the hours needed to qualify for EI after the date their pension starts, then their pension money will not be deducted from their EI benefits (see EI Regulation, s 35(7)(e).
:'''NOTE:''' Retirement pensions are generally considered income and are deducted from EI benefits.  However, if the claimant accumulates all the hours needed to qualify for EI after the date their pension starts, then their pension money will not be deducted from their EI benefits (see EI Regulation, s 35(7)(e).


== E. The Waiting Period ==
== E. The Waiting Period ==
Line 58: Line 58:
Before receiving any EI benefits, a claimant must serve a one week “waiting period” during which they are unemployed and otherwise eligible for benefits (EI Act, section 13).
Before receiving any EI benefits, a claimant must serve a one week “waiting period” during which they are unemployed and otherwise eligible for benefits (EI Act, section 13).
   
   
This waiting period also applies to pregnancy, parental, caregiver and sickness claims. For caregiver benefits, it can be deferred for the second family member if benefits are split, but the first person must serve it.  If a claimant works during the waiting period, 100 percent of his or her earnings will be deducted from the first three (and no more than three) weekly benefit cheques.
This waiting period also applies to pregnancy, parental, caregiver and sickness claims. For caregiver benefits, it can be deferred for the second family member if benefits are split, but the first person must serve it.  If a claimant works during the waiting period, 100 percent of their earnings will be deducted from the first three (and no more than three) weekly benefit cheques.


== F. Length of Benefit Period ==
== F. Length of Benefit Period ==


The benefit period for regular EI benefits is 52 weeks. However, this period can sometimes be extended to more than 52 weeks,  The criteria for this are set out in s 10(10) of the EI Act.  The benefit period can be extended when a claimant proves that for any week during that benefit period the claimant was not entitled to benefit by reason of:
The benefit period for regular EI benefits is 52 weeks (''EI Act'', s 10(2)). However, this period can sometimes be extended to more than 52 weeks,  The criteria for this are set out in s 10(10) of the EI Act.  The benefit period can be extended when a claimant proves that for any week during that benefit period the claimant was not entitled to benefit by reason of:
   
   
*a) receiving earnings paid by reason of the complete severance of the relationship between the claimant and the claimant’s former employer (i.e. “using up” severance pay, vacation pay, etc.);  
*a) receiving earnings paid by reason of the complete severance of the relationship between the claimant and the claimant’s former employer (i.e. “using up” severance pay, vacation pay, etc.);  
Line 70: Line 70:
*c) receiving payments under a provincial law on the basis of having ceased to work because continuing to work would have entailed danger to the claimant, the claimant’s unborn child, or a child the claimant is breast-feeding. However, under BC law, BC residents are not entitled to these payments, and this does not apply to them.
*c) receiving payments under a provincial law on the basis of having ceased to work because continuing to work would have entailed danger to the claimant, the claimant’s unborn child, or a child the claimant is breast-feeding. However, under BC law, BC residents are not entitled to these payments, and this does not apply to them.


The benefit period can be further extended under s  10(11) where a claimant can prove that for any week during the extension period, he or she was not entitled to benefit, again for any reason stated in s 10(10).  
The benefit period can be further extended under s  10(11) where a claimant can prove that for any week during the extension period, they were not entitled to benefits, again for any reason stated in s 10(10).  


The length of any benefit period extended for these reasons cannot exceed 104 weeks (''EI Act'', s 10(14)).
The length of any benefit period extended for these reasons cannot exceed 104 weeks (''EI Act'', s 10(14)).
Line 88: Line 88:
Section 10(8) states that a benefit period terminates when:
Section 10(8) states that a benefit period terminates when:


1. no further benefits are payable to the claimant in his or her benefit period;  
1. no further benefits are payable to the claimant in their benefit period;  


2. the benefit period would otherwise end under this section; and
2. the benefit period would otherwise end under this section; and
Line 100: Line 100:
c) qualifies to receive benefit under this part of the ''EI Act''.
c) qualifies to receive benefit under this part of the ''EI Act''.


NOTE: The way benefit rates are calculated under the ''EI Act'' can make the timing of the decision to end one claim and start a new one crucial.  Therefore, it may be better for a claimant to terminate an existing benefit period prior to its expiration and establish a new one, in order to use working periods during the benefit period that may improve his or her benefit rate or attachment.
NOTE: The way benefit rates are calculated under the ''EI Act'' can make the timing of the decision to end one claim and start a new one crucial.  


{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}

Navigation menu