Starting a Small Claim (20:V): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
The fastest and least expensive way to resolve a dispute is to tell the other person what you are claiming from them and why you are claiming  it. If the other person agrees with the amount or responds in a manner that leads to a settlement, both  parties will save the time, effort, expense, and uncertainty of a lawsuit.  
The fastest and least expensive way to resolve a dispute is to tell the other person what you are claiming from them and why you are claiming  it. If the other person agrees with the amount or responds in a manner that leads to a settlement, both  parties will save the time, effort, expense, and uncertainty of a lawsuit.  


''Bona fide'' attempts to settle may involve concessions and admissions of liability. For example, a claimant may offer to settle for less than the claim to account for the cost, time investment, and risk of going to trial. A defendant, for example, may admit liability but dispute the  amount owed. Whenever parties can agree on certain points, the likelihood of settlement increases.  
Good faith attempts to settle may involve concessions and admissions of liability. For example, a claimant may offer to settle for less than the claim to account for the cost, time investment, and risk of going to trial. A defendant, for example, may admit liability but dispute the  amount owed. Whenever parties can agree on certain points, the likelihood of settlement increases.  


Because of the strong public interest in settlement, these bona fide settlement attempts are protected by settlement privilege. This means that, if the matter is not settled, any reductions in the claim or admissions made disappear and cannot be used against the party who made them (''Schetky v Cochrane'', [1918] 1 WWR 821 (BCCA); ''Greenwood v Fitts'' (1961), 29 DLR (2d) 260 (BCCA)). It is prudent to include the words “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” in correspondence involving bona fide attempts to settle to indicate that the party sending the document wishes to rely on settlement privilege; settlement privilege will still apply, however, even if “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” is not included.
Because of the strong public interest in settlement, these bona fide settlement attempts are protected by settlement privilege. This means that, if the matter is not settled, any reductions in the claim or admissions made disappear and cannot be used against the party who made them (''Schetky v Cochrane'', [1918] 1 WWR 821 (BCCA); ''Greenwood v Fitts'' (1961), 29 DLR (2d) 260 (BCCA)). It is prudent to include the words “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” in correspondence involving bona fide attempts to settle to indicate that the party sending the document wishes to rely on settlement privilege; settlement privilege will still apply, however, even if “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” is not included.

Navigation menu