Difference between revisions of "Employment Insurance Benefit Entitlement (8:VII)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 94: Line 94:
Whether the employee had “just cause” for leaving their employment is decided with statutes and case law.  
Whether the employee had “just cause” for leaving their employment is decided with statutes and case law.  


Sections 29(c)(i) – (xiv) of the ''EI Act'' provide a list of the circumstances that can constitute “just cause”.  '''This list is neither exhaustive nor conclusive.'''  In other words, circumstances not described in s 29(c) can also be just cause if they satisfy the main definition in s 29(c).  On the other hand, circumstances listed in s 29(c)(i) – (xiv) will not be considered “just cause” if the conditions in s 29(c) are not met (if, for example, the claimant had a reasonable alternative).
Sections 29(c)(i) – (xiv) of the ''EI Act'' provide a list of the circumstances that can constitute “just cause”.  This list is '''neither exhaustive nor conclusive.'''  In other words, circumstances not described in s 29(c) can also be just cause if they satisfy the main definition in s 29(c).  On the other hand, circumstances listed in s 29(c)(i) – (xiv) will not be considered “just cause” if the conditions in s 29(c) are not met (if, for example, the claimant had a reasonable alternative).


:'''NOTE:''' To date, the only prescribed circumstance under s 29(c)(xiv) is ''EI Regulations'' s 51. This states that leaving employment when the employer is downsizing the business and the claimant’s decision preserves the employment of another worker does constitute just cause.  
:'''NOTE:''' To date, the only prescribed circumstance under s 29(c)(xiv) is ''EI Regulations'' s 51. This states that leaving employment when the employer is downsizing the business and the claimant’s decision preserves the employment of another worker does constitute just cause.  
2,734

edits

Navigation menu