2,734
edits
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
==== c) Theft ==== | ==== c) Theft ==== | ||
In the case of ''Attorney General of Canada v Linda Caul'', 2006 FCA 251, the court decided that the claimant stealing from her employer, particularly given that the employee was in a position of trust, amounted to misconduct | In the case of ''Attorney General of Canada v Linda Caul'', 2006 FCA 251, the court decided that the claimant stealing from her employer, particularly given that the employee was in a position of trust, amounted to misconduct even though the employee acted foolishly or in desperation and the employer’s response was ‘overkill’. | ||
==== d) Addiction ==== | ==== d) Addiction ==== |
edits