Difference between revisions of "Employment Insurance Benefit Entitlement (8:VII)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 140: Line 140:
==== c) Theft ====
==== c) Theft ====


In the case of ''Attorney General of Canada v Linda Caul'', 2006 FCA 251, the court decided that the claimant stealing from her employer, particularly given that the employee was in a position of trust, amounted to misconduct eventhough the employee acted foolishly or in desperation and the employer’s response was ‘overkill’.
In the case of ''Attorney General of Canada v Linda Caul'', 2006 FCA 251, the court decided that the claimant stealing from her employer, particularly given that the employee was in a position of trust, amounted to misconduct even though the employee acted foolishly or in desperation and the employer’s response was ‘overkill’.


==== d) Addiction ====
==== d) Addiction ====
2,734

edits

Navigation menu