2,734
edits
Difference between revisions of "Small Claims Settlement Conferences (20:XI)"
From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Small Claims Settlement Conferences (20:XI) (view source)
Revision as of 20:38, 23 November 2022
, 20:38, 23 November 2022→D. Disclosure
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
If a party does not comply with a disclosure order, a judge may adjourn the trial, the settlement conference, or both, order that party to pay expenses, order the trial to proceed without allowing that evidence to be used, or dismiss the action. | If a party does not comply with a disclosure order, a judge may adjourn the trial, the settlement conference, or both, order that party to pay expenses, order the trial to proceed without allowing that evidence to be used, or dismiss the action. | ||
'''NOTE:''' For case law relating to the disclosure of medical documents and ethical obligations of physicians to their patients see [http://canlii.ca/t/216h1 ''Halliday v McCulloch'', [1986<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No 223 (BCCA)], [http://canlii.ca/t/g92dd ''Hope v Brown'', [1990<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No. 2586], [http://canlii.ca/t/1d1t8 ''Davies v Milne'', 1999 CanLII 6654 (BCSC)], and [http://canlii.ca/t/1g5q6 ''Cunningham v Slubowski'', 2003 BCSC 1854.] | :'''NOTE:''' For case law relating to the disclosure of medical documents and ethical obligations of physicians to their patients see [http://canlii.ca/t/216h1 ''Halliday v McCulloch'', [1986<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No 223 (BCCA)], [http://canlii.ca/t/g92dd ''Hope v Brown'', [1990<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No. 2586], [http://canlii.ca/t/1d1t8 ''Davies v Milne'', 1999 CanLII 6654 (BCSC)], and [http://canlii.ca/t/1g5q6 ''Cunningham v Slubowski'', 2003 BCSC 1854.] | ||
'''NOTE:''' For case law on obtaining disclosure from the Crown (e.g., from a related criminal case) in a civil case see [http://canlii.ca/t/1n0h2 ''Huang (litigation guardian of) v Sadler'', [2006<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No. 758 (BCSC)] and [http://canlii.ca/t/21zxc ''Wong v Antunes'', 2008 BCSC 1739]. | :'''NOTE:''' For case law on obtaining disclosure from the Crown (e.g., from a related criminal case) in a civil case see [http://canlii.ca/t/1n0h2 ''Huang (litigation guardian of) v Sadler'', [2006<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No. 758 (BCSC)] and [http://canlii.ca/t/21zxc ''Wong v Antunes'', 2008 BCSC 1739]. | ||
'''NOTE:''' For case law pertaining to the admissibility of evidence obtained through electronic surveillance (e.g., recording telephone conversations and videotaping) and whether it will be considered a violation of the ''Privacy Act'', RSBC 1996, c 373, see [http://canlii.ca/t/1rfst ''Watts v Klaemt'', 2007 BCSC 662], and [http://canlii.ca/t/1nh0s ''Cam v Hood'', 2006 BCSC 842]. For case law on obtaining evidence from third parties see [http://canlii.ca/t/1q91l ''Lewis v Frye'', 2007 BCSC 89]. | :'''NOTE:''' For case law pertaining to the admissibility of evidence obtained through electronic surveillance (e.g., recording telephone conversations and videotaping) and whether it will be considered a violation of the ''Privacy Act'', RSBC 1996, c 373, see [http://canlii.ca/t/1rfst ''Watts v Klaemt'', 2007 BCSC 662], and [http://canlii.ca/t/1nh0s ''Cam v Hood'', 2006 BCSC 842]. For case law on obtaining evidence from third parties see [http://canlii.ca/t/1q91l ''Lewis v Frye'', 2007 BCSC 89]. | ||
A judge may also order the exchange of all case law prior to the trial date. | A judge may also order the exchange of all case law prior to the trial date. | ||
