Difference between revisions of "Criminal Law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1:IX)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:


Sections 7, 10, and 24 of the ''Charter'' have some measure of effect on arrest procedure, particularly in relation to the conduct of arresting officers and the admissibility of evidence (see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1988/1988canlii44/1988canlii44.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQALciB2IHN0ZXZlbnMAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=2 R v Stevens]'', [1988] 1 SCR 1153). There is also well-developed case law on arrest procedure. See ''Christie v Leachinsky'', [1947] AC 573 (HL) and section 29 of the ''Criminal Code''.
Sections 7, 10, and 24 of the ''Charter'' have some measure of effect on arrest procedure, particularly in relation to the conduct of arresting officers and the admissibility of evidence (see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1988/1988canlii44/1988canlii44.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQALciB2IHN0ZXZlbnMAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=2 R v Stevens]'', [1988] 1 SCR 1153). There is also well-developed case law on arrest procedure. See ''Christie v Leachinsky'', [1947] AC 573 (HL) and section 29 of the ''Criminal Code''.
Sections 7, 10, and 24 of the Charter have some measure of effect on arrest procedure, particularly in relation to the conduct of arresting officers and the admissibility of evidence (see R v Stevens, [1988] 1 SCR 1153). There is also well-developed case law on arrest procedure. See Christie v Leachinsky, [1947] AC 573 (HL) and section 29 of the Criminal Code.




5,109

edits

Navigation menu