Further Topics and Overlapping Legal Issues in Family Law: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{{OKCOPY}}
{{OKCOPY}}


Problems like children's parenting arrangements, support and the division of property are the everyday issues that crop up when a relationship breaks down. There is a whole host of other legal issues that fall under the family law umbrella, and it's a big umbrella. This chapter deals with the more common of these other issues, including adoption, family violence and protection orders, determining parentage, wills and estates issues, changing names and more.
Problems like children's parenting arrangements, support, and the division of property are the everyday issues that crop up when a relationship breaks down. There is a whole host of other legal issues that fall under the family law umbrella, and it's a big umbrella.  


This page is a bit of a grab bag and takes a look at a selection of relatively common family law problems. It talks about issues affecting the LGBT communities, wills and estates law, immigration law, parental support and what happens when people and property are located in different legal jurisdictions.
This chapter deals with the more common of these other issues, including adoption, family violence and protection orders, determining parentage, wills and estates issues, changing names, and more.
 
This section is a bit of a grab bag and takes a look at a selection of relatively common family law problems. It talks about issues affecting the LGBT communities, wills and estates law, immigration law, parental support, and what happens when people and property are located in different legal jurisdictions.


==Same-sex relationships==
==Same-sex relationships==


Not too long ago, this wiki had an entire chapter about the particular issues affecting those in same-sex relationships. That chapter, however, is no longer necessary. For the last 30 years or so, there has been a steady erosion of legislated discrimination between opposite- and same-sex relationships. While gays and lesbians may have to deal with homophobia and intolerance in their day-to-day lives, at least the discrimination which used to exist by the operation of law has been on the wane. From the [http://canlii.ca/t/5239 Little Sisters decision] on censorship to ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1frkt Egan v. Canada]'', [1995] 2 SCR 513, on spousal benefits, the courts of Canada have proven increasingly willing to extend the protection of the ''[http://canlii.ca/t/8q7l Charter of Rights and Freedoms]'' to overturn discriminatory legislation and, after some initial resistance, the governments of Canada have followed suit.
Not too long ago, this wiki had an entire chapter about the particular issues affecting those in same-sex relationships. That chapter, however, is no longer necessary. For the last 30 years or so, there has been a steady erosion of legislated discrimination between opposite- and same-sex relationships. While gays and lesbians may have to deal with homophobia and intolerance in their day-to-day lives, at least the discrimination that used to exist by the operation of law has been on the wane. From the [http://canlii.ca/t/5239 Little Sisters decision] on censorship to ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1frkt Egan v. Canada]'', [1995] 2 SCR 513, on spousal benefits, the courts of Canada have proven increasingly willing to extend the protection of the ''[http://canlii.ca/t/8q7l Charter of Rights and Freedoms]'' to overturn discriminatory legislation and, after some initial resistance, the governments of Canada have followed suit.


The realm of family law has proven no exception. To quote <!--spelled with lower case on purpose-->barbara findlay QC, a tireless advocate for queer rights, from a speech to the [http://www.cba.org/bc/home/main/ Canadian Bar Association British Columbia] a number of years ago:
The realm of family law has proven no exception. To quote <!--spelled with lower case on purpose-->barbara findlay QC, a tireless advocate for queer rights, from a speech to the [http://www.cba.org/bc/home/main/ Canadian Bar Association British Columbia] a number of years ago:
Line 15: Line 17:
<blockquote>"Gays and lesbians in British Columbia now have exactly the same rights and obligations towards one another as straight people do. Exactly the same. Full stop."</blockquote>
<blockquote>"Gays and lesbians in British Columbia now have exactly the same rights and obligations towards one another as straight people do. Exactly the same. Full stop."</blockquote>


She is entirely correct. As far as the provincial statutes of British Columbia are concerned, and indeed the vast majority of federal statutes as well, there is equality. The Court of Appeal for British Columbia was among the first of Canada's appellate courts to acknowledge that restricting the right to marry to straight couples alone was an egregious breach of the equality rights of gays and lesbians, and our provincial ''[http://canlii.ca/t/84g5 Adoption Act]'' is one of the few in Canada which permit adoption by same-sex couples. Gays and lesbians are equally entitled to pursue claims relating to the care of children, child support, spousal support and the division of property as straight people are; sexual orientation plays no part in the division of family property, nor is it a factor in determining issues relating to children or support.
She is entirely correct. As far as the provincial statutes of British Columbia are concerned, and indeed the vast majority of federal statutes as well, there is equality. The Court of Appeal for British Columbia was among the first of Canada's appellate courts to acknowledge that restricting the right to marry to straight couples alone was an egregious breach of the equality rights of gays and lesbians, and our provincial ''[http://canlii.ca/t/84g5 Adoption Act]'' is one of the few in Canada that permit adoption by same-sex couples.  
 
Gays and lesbians are equally entitled to pursue claims relating to the care of children, child support, spousal support, and the division of property as straight people are. Sexual orientation plays no part in the division of family property, nor is it a factor in determining issues relating to children or support.


How does family law intersect with gay and lesbian relationships? In every way. There is no relief known to family law of which straight couples can avail themselves that same-sex couples cannot.
How does family law intersect with gay and lesbian relationships? In every way. There is no relief known to family law of which straight couples can avail themselves that same-sex couples cannot.
Line 23: Line 27:
As a result of the 2005 federal ''[http://canlii.ca/t/7w02 Civil Marriage Act]'', same-sex couples can legally marry throughout Canada. Of course, not everyone can marry, such as close relatives or minors under a certain age. See the [[Married Spouses]] page for more information about the capacity to marry, valid marriages and invalid marriages.
As a result of the 2005 federal ''[http://canlii.ca/t/7w02 Civil Marriage Act]'', same-sex couples can legally marry throughout Canada. Of course, not everyone can marry, such as close relatives or minors under a certain age. See the [[Married Spouses]] page for more information about the capacity to marry, valid marriages and invalid marriages.


It's not just Canadian couples who can marry. Anyone from anywhere can get married in Canada, as long as they meet the Canadian criteria for a valid marriage. However, while Canadian marriages are certainly legal in Canada, they may not be recognized as a valid marriage at home. If a couple's home country does not recognize same-sex marriages as valid marriages, the Canadian marriage is unlikely to be valid in that country.
It's not just Canadian couples who can marry. Anyone from anywhere can get married in Canada, as long as they meet the Canadian criteria for a valid marriage. However, while Canadian marriages are certainly legal in Canada, they may not be recognized as valid marriages at home. If a couple's home country does not recognize same-sex marriages as valid marriages, the Canadian marriage is unlikely to be valid in that country.


===Children===
===Children===
Line 48: Line 52:
Whether you are straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, or something in between, if you qualify as a ''parent'' for the purposes of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'', or the child qualifies as a ''child of the marriage'' for the purposes of the ''[[Divorce Act]]'', child support will be payable by the person who has the child for the least amount of time to the person who has the child for the most amount of time. Child support will be payable at the amount specified under the [[Child Support Guidelines]] unless the parent paying support (the "payor") fits into one of a very narrow range of exceptions:
Whether you are straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, or something in between, if you qualify as a ''parent'' for the purposes of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'', or the child qualifies as a ''child of the marriage'' for the purposes of the ''[[Divorce Act]]'', child support will be payable by the person who has the child for the least amount of time to the person who has the child for the most amount of time. Child support will be payable at the amount specified under the [[Child Support Guidelines]] unless the parent paying support (the "payor") fits into one of a very narrow range of exceptions:


*the payment of support in the usual amount would cause "undue hardship",
*the payment of support in the usual amount would cause "undue hardship,"
*the person paying child support, the ''payor'', is responsible for the care and control of the child for more than 40% of the child's time,
*the person paying child support, the ''payor'', is responsible for the care and control of the child for more than 40% of the child's time,
*the payor earns more than $150,000 per year, and payment of the table amount would result in an unfair windfall to the recipient, or
*the payor earns more than $150,000 per year, and payment of the table amount would result in an unfair windfall to the recipient, or
*other persons are also under a legal obligation to care for the child.
*other persons are also under a legal obligation to care for the child.


The only one of these exceptions which has any special relevance to same-sex couples is the last: where another person is also under an obligation to support the child. Assuming there is another parent in the picture apart from the other party to the relationship, that other parent will also be obliged to contribute to the support of the child. In ''Murphy v. Laurence and Rogers'', the biological mother of a child was entitled to receive child support from both her former lesbian partner and the child's father.
The only one of these exceptions that has any special relevance to same-sex couples is the last: where another person is also under an obligation to support the child. Assuming there is another parent in the picture apart from the other party to the relationship, that other parent will also be obliged to contribute to the support of the child. In ''Murphy v. Laurence and Rogers'', the biological mother of a child was entitled to receive child support from both her former lesbian partner and the child's father.


===Divorce===
===Divorce===
Line 61: Line 65:
==Issues affecting the transgendered, transsexual and bisexual==
==Issues affecting the transgendered, transsexual and bisexual==


To be brutally frank, the jury is still out on how family law impacts on the trans community. Right now, the laws have slipped into a comfortable understanding of "the same or opposite genders" that only accommodates people on the spectrum in between with difficulty. While bisexuality is as close to a non-issue in this context as there can be, transgendered and transsexual people may well encounter difficulty dealing with family law matters. This discussion offers only a gloss on some of the issues affecting this community. If you have a family law problem and your orientation, gender or identity becomes an issue, contact a lawyer known to be sympathetic or activist on the issue, such as barbara findlay or another lawyer she can refer you to.
To be brutally frank, the jury is still out on how family law impacts on the trans community. Right now, the laws have slipped into a comfortable understanding of "the same or opposite genders" that only accommodates people on the spectrum in between with difficulty. While bisexuality is as close to a non-issue in this context as there can be, transgendered and transsexual people may well encounter difficulty dealing with family law matters. This discussion offers only a gloss on some of the issues affecting this community.  
 
If you have a family law problem and your orientation, gender or identity becomes an issue, contact a lawyer known to be sympathetic or activist on the issue, such as barbara findlay or another lawyer she can refer you to.


===Marriage===
===Marriage===
Line 69: Line 75:
===Children===
===Children===


Those who have discovered another self-identity during a relationship may find their new identities hotly at issue in the event that the living arrangements for any children must be decided in court. The problem here is that while shows like Will and Grace, The Birdcage and The L Word have made straightforward homosexuality something commonly understood and empathized with, nothing similar has popularized and explained the experience of the trans community. It can be very difficult for people, including ex-partners, to understand trans issues and this problem is especially acute in courtroom discussions about the care and control of children. Often the most important task is to demystify the person's self-identity and explain why his or her self-identity has no impact at all on his or her ability to parent, nor on the expected outcomes for the children.
Those who have discovered another self-identity during a relationship may find their new identities hotly at issue in the event that the living arrangements for any children must be decided in court. The problem here is that while shows like Will and Grace, The Birdcage and The L Word have made straightforward homosexuality something commonly understood and empathized with, nothing similar has popularized and explained the experience of the trans community. It can be very difficult for people, including ex-partners, to understand trans issues, and this problem is especially acute in courtroom discussions about the care and control of children. Often the most important task is to demystify the person's self-identity and explain why his or her self-identity has no impact at all on his or her ability to parent, nor on the expected outcomes for the children.


On the bright side, the single reported case I was able to find in researching transgendered and transsexual family law issues dealt fairly positively with the subject. (This research is a few years old.) In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/fvzvc Forrester v. Saliba]'', 2000 CanLII 28722 ONCJ, a 2000 decision of the Ontario Court of Justice, the father of the child had begun the process of transitioning to female following the pronouncement of a consent order which provided that the parents would have joint custody of the child. The mother brought an application to vary the order to obtain sole custody of the child based on the stress and depression that affected the parents since the commencement of the transitioning process. Here are some interesting excerpts from the decision:
On the bright side, the single reported case I was able to find in researching transgendered and transsexual family law issues dealt fairly positively with the subject. (This research is a few years old.) In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/fvzvc Forrester v. Saliba]'', 2000 CanLII 28722 ONCJ, a 2000 decision of the Ontario Court of Justice, the father of the child had begun the process of transitioning to female following the pronouncement of a consent order which provided that the parents would have joint custody of the child. The mother brought an application to vary the order to obtain sole custody of the child based on the stress and depression that affected the parents since the commencement of the transitioning process. Here are some interesting excerpts from the decision:
Line 92: Line 98:
==Wills and estates issues==
==Wills and estates issues==


''Wills and estates'' refers to the area of law that deals with the drafting and interpretation of wills, how a dead person's estate is distributed when there is a valid will, how a dead person's estate is distributed when there isn't a valid will and how certain relatives can challenge a dead person's will. In family law, issues concerning a person's will usually only come up when a couple have separated or are getting a divorce.
''Wills and estates'' refers to the area of law that deals with the drafting and interpretation of wills, how a dead person's estate is distributed when there is a valid will, how a dead person's estate is distributed when there isn't a valid will, and how certain relatives can challenge a dead person's will. In family law, issues concerning a person's will usually only come up when a couple have separated or are getting a divorce.


Making, changing, revoking and enforcing wills are governed by the provincial ''[http://canlii.ca/t/84fx Wills Act]''. Sections 3 and 4 set out the basic requirements for a valid will:
Making, changing, revoking, and enforcing wills are governed by the provincial ''[http://canlii.ca/t/84fx Wills Act]''. Sections 3 and 4 set out the basic requirements for a valid will:


<blockquote><tt>3 A will is valid only if it is in writing.</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>3 A will is valid only if it is in writing.</tt></blockquote>
Line 143: Line 149:
===Planning ahead===
===Planning ahead===


If you have separated and don't want your spouse to make a claim to your property after you die, you should change your will. If you are married and have separated, you should include wording in the new will which to the effect that the new will is being made with your divorce in mind and stating that you do not wish to provide for your spouse as a result. You should then prepare another new will after the order for your divorce is made and is in effect.
If you have separated and don't want your spouse to make a claim to your property after you die, you should change your will. If you are married and have separated, you should include wording in the new will to the effect that the new will is being made with your divorce in mind and stating that you do not wish to provide for your spouse as a result. You should then prepare another new will after the order for your divorce is made and is in effect.


If you are in an unmarried relationship, you should simply identify your former spouse as your former unmarried spouse, state that you do not wish to provide for him or her in your will, and briefly explain why you do not wish to provide for him or her.
If you are in an unmarried relationship, you should simply identify your former spouse as your former unmarried spouse, state that you do not wish to provide for him or her in your will, and briefly explain why you do not wish to provide for him or her.
2,443

edits

Navigation menu