Difference between revisions of "Welfare Appeals (21:XI)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(LSLAP Chapter Update 2017)
Line 3: Line 3:
== A. What Can Be Appealed ==
== A. What Can Be Appealed ==


It is possible to appeal most MSDSI decisions that deny, reduce, or discontinue welfare benefits of any kind, including supplements. See s 17 of the EAA and s 16 of the EAPWDA.  
It is possible to appeal most Ministry decisions that deny, reduce, or discontinue welfare benefits of any kind, including supplements. See s 17 of the EAA and s 16 of the EAPWDA.  


The legislation list certain supplements for which decisions can not be appealed to the Employment and Assistance AppealTribunal: see EAR, s  81, and EAPWDA, s 73. Note however that a person may still apply for reconsideration of decisions related to those supplements. In addition, one cannot appeal decisions regarding the terms of employment plans to the Tribunal, but they can be reconsidered (see s 9 and 17(1)(e) of the EAA).  
The legislation list certain supplements for which decisions can not be appealed to the Employment and Assistance AppealTribunal: see EAR, s  81, and EAPWDA, s 73. Note however that a person may still apply for reconsideration of decisions related to those supplements. In addition, one cannot appeal decisions regarding the terms of employment plans to the Tribunal, but they can be reconsidered (see s 9 and 17(1)(e) of the EAA).  


'''NOTE:''' If a client would like a review of a decision that is not open to reconsideration and/or appeal, they may still request an internal administrative review by registering a complaint with the supervisor at a local MSDSI office. This may be particularly useful for service  quality issues. This is entirely separate from the appeal process.  
'''NOTE:''' If a client would like a review of a decision that is not open to reconsideration and/or appeal, they may still request an internal administrative review by registering a complaint with the supervisor at a local Ministry office. This may be particularly useful for service  quality issues. This is entirely separate from the appeal process.  


== B. Two-Level Appeal Process ==
== B. Two-Level Appeal Process ==


There is a two-level appeal process for reviewing decisions by MSDSI. The levels are:  
There is a two-level appeal process for reviewing decisions by the Ministry. The levels are:  
*reconsideration (which is an administrative review done within the MSDSI) and  
*reconsideration (which is an administrative review done within the Ministry) and  
*appeal to the Employment and Assistance Appeal Tribunal or “EAAT”  an independent tribunal).   
*appeal to the Employment and Assistance Appeal Tribunal or “EAAT”  an independent tribunal).   


To seek reconsideration, a person must obtain and complete a “Request for Reconsideration” form and return it to MSDSI '''within 20 business  days of being notified of a decision''', along with relevant documents, to request a reconsideration of a MSDSI decision.   
To seek reconsideration, a person must obtain and complete a “Request for Reconsideration” form and return it to the Ministry'''within 20 business  days of being notified of a decision''', along with relevant documents, to request a reconsideration of a Ministry decision.   


“Request for Reconsideration” forms can be picked up at MSDSI offices.   
“Request for Reconsideration” forms can be picked up at Ministry offices.   


To appeal a reconsideration decision to the EAAT, a person must submit a Notice of Appeal form within '''seven business days''' of being notified of the reconsideration decision.  
To appeal a reconsideration decision to the EAAT, a person must submit a Notice of Appeal form within '''seven business days''' of being notified of the reconsideration decision.  
Line 25: Line 25:
If a recipient is seeking reconsideration or appeal of a decision to discontinue or reduce a benefit or supplement, he or she may continue to receive the benefit or supplement while awaiting the outcome of the reconsideration or appeal. This is called a “reconsideration supplement”  or “appeal supplement”.  
If a recipient is seeking reconsideration or appeal of a decision to discontinue or reduce a benefit or supplement, he or she may continue to receive the benefit or supplement while awaiting the outcome of the reconsideration or appeal. This is called a “reconsideration supplement”  or “appeal supplement”.  


Before paying a reconsideration or appeal supplement, MSDSI requires people to sign an agreement saying they will repay the benefit if the appeal fails. See s 54 of EAR and s 52 of EAPWDR.  
Before paying a reconsideration or appeal supplement, the Ministry requires people to sign an agreement saying they will repay the benefit if the appeal fails. See s 54 of EAR and s 52 of EAPWDR.  


== D. Commonly Appealed Decisions ==
== D. Commonly Appealed Decisions ==
Line 41: Line 41:
== E. APPEAL LEVEL 1: Reconsideration ==
== E. APPEAL LEVEL 1: Reconsideration ==


Reconsideration is a “paper review” by MSDSI with no hearing. To request reconsideration, the client needs to fill in Request for Reconsideration form. He or she may need to ask for this form, although often it will come with the MSDSI decision.  
Reconsideration is a “paper review” by the Ministry with no hearing. To request reconsideration, the client needs to fill in Request for Reconsideration form. He or she may need to ask for this form, although often it will come with the Ministry decision.  


The client '''must''' get the completed request for reconsideration in to MSDSI within 20 business days from the day the client was informed of the decision.  
The client '''must''' get the completed request for reconsideration in to the Ministrywithin 20 business days from the day the client was informed of the decision.  


A client should submit the following with a request for reconsideration:   
A client should submit the following with a request for reconsideration:   
Line 49: Line 49:
*'''Argument:''' it is also good to provide a one-page written summary of outlining why the client is eligible for the benefit.   
*'''Argument:''' it is also good to provide a one-page written summary of outlining why the client is eligible for the benefit.   


If a client is not able to submit all relevant evidence and argument to MSDSI within the 20 business day deadline, they can request (in writing) an extension to do so of up to 10 business days. They must still submit the completed Request for Reconsideration form to MSDSI within  the initial 20 business day deadline, but can indicate on that form that they require an extension of time to provide supporting evidence and argument.   
If a client is not able to submit all relevant evidence and argument to the Ministry within the 20 business day deadline, they can request (in writing) an extension to do so of up to 10 business days. They must still submit the completed Request for Reconsideration form to the Ministry within  the initial 20 business day deadline, but can indicate on that form that they require an extension of time to provide supporting evidence and argument.   


Once a completed Request for Reconsideration form is submitted to MSDSI, MSDSI must provide a written response to the reconsideration request  within 10 business days. Section 80(b) of the EAR, and s 72(b) of the EAPWDR provide that, with the agreement of both parties, MSDSI may have up to an additional 10 business days to make its decision. These are the sections that are relied upon when requesting an extension of time to  provide additional evidence and argument in support of a client’s completed Request for Reconsideration form.   
Once a completed Request for Reconsideration form is submitted to the Ministry, the Ministry must provide a written response to the reconsideration request  within 10 business days. Section 80(b) of the EAR, and s 72(b) of the EAPWDR provide that, with the agreement of both parties, the Ministry may have up to an additional 10 business days to make its decision. These are the sections that are relied upon when requesting an extension of time to  provide additional evidence and argument in support of a client’s completed Request for Reconsideration form.   


'''NOTE:''' While going through this process, it is also well worth contacting the Supervisor at the client’s MSDSI office to try and negotiate  a solution, particularly if the decision appears to be obviously unfair and out of line with the legislation.   
'''NOTE:''' While going through this process, it is also well worth contacting the Supervisor at the client’s Ministry office to try and negotiate  a solution, particularly if the decision appears to be obviously unfair and out of line with the legislation.   


== F. APPEAL LEVEL 2: Appeal to the EAAT ==
== F. APPEAL LEVEL 2: Appeal to the EAAT ==
Line 61: Line 61:
The EAAT holds oral and written hearings. Oral hearings may be done in person or by teleconference. An oral, in-person hearing should always available if the client requests one, although it may lead to a delay in scheduling.   
The EAAT holds oral and written hearings. Oral hearings may be done in person or by teleconference. An oral, in-person hearing should always available if the client requests one, although it may lead to a delay in scheduling.   


To request an appeal, file a Notice of Appeal with the EAAT or deliver it to a local MSDSI office. The EAAT or MSDSI must receive the notice  of appeal within '''7 business days''' from the day the client gets the reconsideration decision.   
To request an appeal, file a Notice of Appeal with the EAAT or deliver it to a local Ministry office. The EAAT or the Ministry must receive the notice  of appeal within '''7 business days''' from the day the client gets the reconsideration decision.   


One does not need to file evidence or argument at the same time as filing the Notice of Appeal, although one could do so.   
One does not need to file evidence or argument at the same time as filing the Notice of Appeal, although one could do so.   
Line 67: Line 67:
The EAAT will hold the hearing within 15 business days of the notice of appeal, unless the client consents to having it later.  
The EAAT will hold the hearing within 15 business days of the notice of appeal, unless the client consents to having it later.  


If an applicant needs more time once he or she has filed the notice of appeal, the Tribunal has an adjournment request form online. Ideally  the applicant should get MSDSI to consent to the adjournment and send the form in at least 24 hours before the hearing. Applicants can also ask for an adjournment on the day if there is good reason.   
If an applicant needs more time once he or she has filed the notice of appeal, the Tribunal has an adjournment request form online. Ideally  the applicant should get the Ministry to consent to the adjournment and send the form in at least 24 hours before the hearing. Applicants can also ask for an adjournment on the day if there is good reason.   


The following are some notes about the EAAT process:  
The following are some notes about the EAAT process:  
Line 74: Line 74:
*It cannot apply the Charter or ''Human Rights Code'' (see the ''Administrative Tribunals Act'');  
*It cannot apply the Charter or ''Human Rights Code'' (see the ''Administrative Tribunals Act'');  
*While an EAAT hearing is formal, it is less formal than court. Rules of evidence are not strictly applied;   
*While an EAAT hearing is formal, it is less formal than court. Rules of evidence are not strictly applied;   
*MSDSI sends a representative to advocate for its point of view at most EAAT hearings; and  
*The Ministry sends a representative to advocate for its point of view at most EAAT hearings; and  
*Appellants before the EAAT may be represented by an advocate or legal counsel. LSLAP students may act in this capacity for clients.  
*Appellants before the EAAT may be represented by an advocate or legal counsel. LSLAP students may act in this capacity for clients.  


Line 80: Line 80:


Evidence can be given at an EAAT hearing in the following forms:
Evidence can be given at an EAAT hearing in the following forms:
*'''Documentary evidence''', which should be set it in to EAAT in advance if possible, but it is acceptable to bring it to the hearing, with enough copies for the three panel members and the MSDSI representative) and   
*'''Documentary evidence''', which should be set it in to EAAT in advance if possible, but it is acceptable to bring it to the hearing, with enough copies for the three panel members and the Ministry representative) and   
*'''Oral evidence''' from client or supporters.  
*'''Oral evidence''' from client or supporters.  


Completely new evidence is not supposed to be allowed before the EAAT, whereas evidence “supporting” what was put forward at reconsideration is allowed. There can sometimes be a fine line between new evidence and supporting evidence. The EAAT has a useful guideline on this issue, at http://www.gov.bc.ca/eaat/popt/additional_evidence.html  
Completely new evidence is not supposed to be allowed before the EAAT, whereas evidence “supporting” what was put forward at reconsideration is allowed. There can sometimes be a fine line between new evidence and supporting evidence. The EAAT has a useful guideline on this issue, at http://www.gov.bc.ca/eaat/popt/additional_evidence.html  


The EAAT must decide whether MSDSI’s reconsideration decision:  
The EAAT must decide whether the Ministry's reconsideration decision:  
*Is reasonably supported by evidence OR   
*Is reasonably supported by evidence OR   
*Is a reasonable application of the legislation to the circumstances of the person appealing the decision (s 24 of the EAA).   
*Is a reasonable application of the legislation to the circumstances of the person appealing the decision (s 24 of the EAA).   


If so, the panel must uphold MSDSI’s decision, and if not, the panel must rescind the Ministry’s decision. If the decision of the tribunal cannot be implemented without some further determination, then the tribunal must refer the further determination back to MSDSI.  
If so, the panel must uphold the Ministry's decision, and if not, the panel must rescind the Ministry’s decision. If the decision of the tribunal cannot be implemented without some further determination, then the tribunal must refer the further determination back to the Ministry.  


The EAAT panel must render its decision within five business days of the conclusion of the hearing. The EAAT chair then has five business days to mail a copy of it to all parties.  
The EAAT panel must render its decision within five business days of the conclusion of the hearing. The EAAT chair then has five business days to mail a copy of it to all parties.  
Line 129: Line 129:
*Representatives should read Part 6 of the EAR carefully to offer advice on the appeal process.   
*Representatives should read Part 6 of the EAR carefully to offer advice on the appeal process.   
*The representative should determine what the issues are and read all of the relevant sections of the EAA or the EAPWDA and the associated Regulations.   
*The representative should determine what the issues are and read all of the relevant sections of the EAA or the EAPWDA and the associated Regulations.   
*A representative should have the client fill out an “Authorization for Advocate and Confidentiality” form authorizing the representative to examine the client’s MSDSI file. Also, if the case is at the EAAT level, a “Release of Information” form from the EAAT website should be completed. These forms are needed to communicate with the MSDSI and the EAAT about the client’s case.   
*A representative should have the client fill out an “Authorization for Advocate and Confidentiality” form authorizing the representative to examine the client’s Ministry file. Also, if the case is at the EAAT level, a “Release of Information” form from the EAAT website should be completed. These forms are needed to communicate with the Ministry and the EAAT about the client’s case.   
*If a client has received a decision from MSDSI but has not yet taken any appeal steps, the representative should advise him or her to obtain a “Request for Reconsideration” form from the MSDSI office and to complete and return it to his or her local MSDSI office. This must be done within '''20 business days''' of getting the decision. If there is enough time, it is very helpful if you can help the client to fill in the Request for Reconsideration.   
*If a client has received a decision from the Ministry but has not yet taken any appeal steps, the representative should advise him or her to obtain a “Request for Reconsideration” form from the Ministry office and to complete and return it to his or her local Ministry office. This must be done within '''20 business days''' of getting the decision. If there is enough time, it is very helpful if you can help the client to fill in the Request for Reconsideration.   
*If an applicant has already received a reconsideration decision, and the matter is appealable (see above) advise him or her to complete a  Notice of Appeal form and to send it to the EAAT '''within seven business days''' of getting the reconsideration decision.   
*If an applicant has already received a reconsideration decision, and the matter is appealable (see above) advise him or her to complete a  Notice of Appeal form and to send it to the EAAT '''within seven business days''' of getting the reconsideration decision.   
*With the law as set out by the Act and regulation in mind, the representative should get copies of all relevant documents and review the details of the client’s case. It is vital to have a clear, comprehensive account of the facts as your client understands them.  
*With the law as set out by the Act and regulation in mind, the representative should get copies of all relevant documents and review the details of the client’s case. It is vital to have a clear, comprehensive account of the facts as your client understands them.  
*If the applicant submits additional documentation as evidence, such as medical reports, affidavits, or receipts, make enough copies for MSDSI’s representatives and the tribunal members. Because there is no registry for administrative support for the tribunal system, advocates  must assume responsibility for seeing that all documentation is well-organized.   
*If the applicant submits additional documentation as evidence, such as medical reports, affidavits, or receipts, make enough copies for the Ministry's representatives and the tribunal members. Because there is no registry for administrative support for the tribunal system, advocates  must assume responsibility for seeing that all documentation is well-organized.   
*At all levels of appeal, it is best to have a written statement of one’s presentation of the facts in case there is a judicial review.  Hearings at the EAAT are not otherwise recorded.  
*At all levels of appeal, it is best to have a written statement of one’s presentation of the facts in case there is a judicial review.  Hearings at the EAAT are not otherwise recorded.  
*See above for specific tips on each level of appeal.
*See above for specific tips on each level of appeal.