Clicklaw Wikibooks Cheatsheet: Difference between revisions
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
::second indent | ::second indent | ||
:::third indent | :::third indent | ||
|-<!--EXAMPLES--> | |-<!--CASELAW EXAMPLES--> | ||
| colspan="3" style="background:#FFCC66; padding: 0.2em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;" | ''' | | colspan="3" style="background:#FFCC66; padding: 0.2em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;" | '''Working Example of a Case Citation and Link''' | ||
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS--> | |-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS--> | ||
| width="30%" style="background:#FFCC66; padding:0.3em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;"|Description | | width="30%" style="background:#FFCC66; padding:0.3em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;"|Description |
Revision as of 23:36, 3 June 2013
This is a help page for contributors or users.
- This page contains no legal help information.
- See other Clicklaw Wikibooks Guides.
See the Clicklaw Wikibooks Style Guide for style and word usage.
Clicklaw Wikibooks Cheatsheet | ||
Works anywhere in the text | ||
Description | You type | You get |
Italic text |
''italic'' |
italic |
Bold text |
'''bold''' |
bold |
Bold and italic text |
'''''bold & italic''''' |
bold & italic |
Link to another Clicklaw wiki page |
[[Name of page]] |
|
Works only at the beginning of lines | ||
Description | You type | You get |
Section headings A Table of Contents will automatically be generated when four headings are added to an article.
Do not use =Level 1=; it is reserved for page titles.
|
== Level 2 == |
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4 |
Bulleted list |
* One |
|
Numbered list |
# One |
|
Indenting text |
no indent (normal) |
no indent (normal)
|
Working Example of a Case Citation and Link | ||
Description | You type | You get |
Case reference For linking and providing the proper citation of a case law, see Style Guide. |
In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/2d35m Domirti v. Domirti]'', 2010 BCCA 472, the Court of Appeal ruled that a spousal support award outside the Advisory Guidelines could be an appealable error. |
In Domirti v. Domirti, 2010 BCCA 472, the Court of Appeal ruled that a spousal support award outside the Advisory Guidelines could be an appealable error. |
|