Checklist for Contributors: Difference between revisions
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== 1. Review for accuracy == | |||
For each page you review, please go through the following steps: | For each page you review, please go through the following steps: | ||
=== Read each page === | |||
{{checkbox}} Read and take notes on pages assigned to you | |||
=== Review the law === | |||
{{checkbox}} Read laws in context — start with existing citations in the article <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Review statutory law — check statutory excerpts and compare to current legislation; check Proclamations ([http://www.courthouselibrary.ca/training/BCProclamations.aspx BC] & [http://www.courthouselibrary.ca/training/CanadaProclamations.aspx Canada]) for recent changes <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Check caselaw — note up cases in [http://www.canlii.org CanLII]; note up key sections of legislation to find new cases <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Consult secondary resources — CLE articles, treatises, journals, etc. | |||
=== Verify statements and specifics === | |||
{{checkbox}} Procedural steps — have rules or policies changed? <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Forms— has a form changed name or been replaced? <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Deadlines — readers rely on these being correct <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Monetary amounts, costs or limits — have these details changed? <br/> | |||
=== Resource Links === | |||
{{checkbox}} Check existing links — make sure they work and ALSO make sure they still point to the intended content <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Best external resources — have newer resources arrived and did old ones get stale? <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Best internal links — are concepts discussed that could be cross linked to more Wikibooks and pages? | |||
Once you've reviewed your pages for legal accuracy, you may decide: | Once you've reviewed your pages for legal accuracy, you may decide: | ||
# Edit not needed → {{checkbox}} Just update the “[[Clicklaw_Wikibooks_Contributor_Guide#Legal_accuracy_date|last reviewed for legal accuracy]]” date | |||
# Edit is needed → See step 2 below. | |||
== 2. Edit & develop content == | |||
=== Cure existing legal inaccuracies === | |||
{{checkbox}} Fix incorrect statements — top priority is to correct wrong information, or at least remove the incorrect information <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Update citations — add new legislation or caselaw (use CanLII's short URLs) <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Fix broken links and resources | |||
=== Develop & write === | |||
Write new content when tweaking existing content won't do. Please consider: | |||
{{checkbox}} Gaps — what is the gap in information and is filling it crucial? <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Plain language — keep writing simple (here are some [http://www.plainlanguage.gov/whatisPL/definitions/Kimble.cfm tips]) <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Brevity — edits should clarify meaning, not add length <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Organization — lists, subheadings and short paragraphs make reading easier and orient the reader <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Legal references — would more citations benefit or just overwhelm the reader? <br/> | |||
=== Simple & consistent === | |||
{{checkbox}} Clarify legal terms, include parenthetical definitions where needed <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Be consistent in word choice (e.g. choose either “renter” or “tenant”) <br/> | |||
<br /> | {{checkbox}} Familiarize yourself with and apply [[Clicklaw_Wikibooks_Style_Guide|Style Guide]]: <br/> | ||
:{{checkbox}} Correct [[Clicklaw_Wikibooks_Style_Guide#Emphasis|word emphasis]], [[Clicklaw_Wikibooks_Style_Guide#Acronyms|acronyms]], and [[Clicklaw_Wikibooks_Style_Guide#References|case citation style]] <br/> | |||
:{{checkbox}} Apply [[Clicklaw_Wikibooks_Style_Guide#Lists|bullets/numbered lists]] and [[Clicklaw_Wikibooks_Style_Guide#Punctuation|punctuation]] <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Format neutral language — writing "See the chapter/page on…" is better than "Click here for information on…" since Wikibooks are also printed | |||
== 3. Optional checklist == | |||
{{checkbox}} Is there extraneous information that should be removed? <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Is the overall language clear and approachable? <br/> | |||
{{checkbox}} Are there other Wikibooks pages that would be improved by linking to your content? Speak to that other editor | |||
{{Template:Navbox for Clicklaw Wikibooks Guide|type=guides}} | {{Template:Navbox for Clicklaw Wikibooks Guide|type=guides}} | ||
<noinclude>__NOGLOSSARY__</noinclude> | <noinclude>__NOGLOSSARY__</noinclude> | ||
[[Category:Clicklaw Wikibooks Guides]] | [[Category:Clicklaw Wikibooks Guides]] |
Revision as of 18:33, 9 March 2017
This is a help page for contributors or users.
- This page contains no legal help information.
- See other Clicklaw Wikibooks Guides.
Please refer to this checklist each time you review your assigned pages, also available in PDF format: Editorial Checklist for Contributors
- The purpose of reviewing pages is to ensure changes in law are reflected in content.
- Clicklaw Wikibooks provide reliable, up-to-date, plain language information to help British Columbians address legal problems or learn about the law.
- Some Wikibooks offer brief, punctual tips — other titles offer more comprehensive guidance.
- What is your Wikibook's editorial objective? Consider the purpose, tone and audience of the title as a whole when making edits.
1. Review for accuracy
For each page you review, please go through the following steps:
Read each page
□ Read and take notes on pages assigned to you
Review the law
□ Read laws in context — start with existing citations in the article
□ Review statutory law — check statutory excerpts and compare to current legislation; check Proclamations (BC & Canada) for recent changes
□ Check caselaw — note up cases in CanLII; note up key sections of legislation to find new cases
□ Consult secondary resources — CLE articles, treatises, journals, etc.
Verify statements and specifics
□ Procedural steps — have rules or policies changed?
□ Forms— has a form changed name or been replaced?
□ Deadlines — readers rely on these being correct
□ Monetary amounts, costs or limits — have these details changed?
Resource Links
□ Check existing links — make sure they work and ALSO make sure they still point to the intended content
□ Best external resources — have newer resources arrived and did old ones get stale?
□ Best internal links — are concepts discussed that could be cross linked to more Wikibooks and pages?
Once you've reviewed your pages for legal accuracy, you may decide:
- Edit not needed → □ Just update the “last reviewed for legal accuracy” date
- Edit is needed → See step 2 below.
2. Edit & develop content
Cure existing legal inaccuracies
□ Fix incorrect statements — top priority is to correct wrong information, or at least remove the incorrect information
□ Update citations — add new legislation or caselaw (use CanLII's short URLs)
□ Fix broken links and resources
Develop & write
Write new content when tweaking existing content won't do. Please consider:
□ Gaps — what is the gap in information and is filling it crucial?
□ Plain language — keep writing simple (here are some tips)
□ Brevity — edits should clarify meaning, not add length
□ Organization — lists, subheadings and short paragraphs make reading easier and orient the reader
□ Legal references — would more citations benefit or just overwhelm the reader?
Simple & consistent
□ Clarify legal terms, include parenthetical definitions where needed
□ Be consistent in word choice (e.g. choose either “renter” or “tenant”)
□ Familiarize yourself with and apply Style Guide:
- □ Correct word emphasis, acronyms, and case citation style
- □ Apply bullets/numbered lists and punctuation
□ Format neutral language — writing "See the chapter/page on…" is better than "Click here for information on…" since Wikibooks are also printed
3. Optional checklist
□ Is there extraneous information that should be removed?
□ Is the overall language clear and approachable?
□ Are there other Wikibooks pages that would be improved by linking to your content? Speak to that other editor
|