Guardianship, Parenting Arrangements and Contact: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
}}
}}


Guardianship is a very old concept that goes back to the law of ancient Rome. Although guardianship can be hard to define, it's probably easiest to think of guardianship as the full bundle of rights and duties involved in caring for and raising a child. Guardianship is still about parental authority. Parents can be, and usually are, the guardians of a child. Other people can be guardians too, including grandparents and stepparents, and the people who become guardians through a guardian's will.
Guardianship is a very old concept that goes back to the law of ancient Rome. Although guardianship can be hard to define, it's probably easiest to think of guardianship as the full bundle of rights and duties involved in caring for and raising a child. Historically, guardianship had two aspects: guardianship of the ''person'' and guardianship of the ''estate.'' Guardianship is still about parental authority. Parents can be, and usually are, the guardians of a child. Other people can be guardians too, including grandparents and stepparents, and the people who become guardians through a guardian's will.


This section talks about who is presumed to be the guardian of a child, how people can apply to be appointed as the guardian of a child, and how people can become a guardian upon the death of a guardian. It also talks about the rights and obligations involved in being a guardian, parental responsibilities and parenting time, and about contact, the time that someone who isn't a guardian may have with a child.
This section talks about who is presumed to be the guardian of a child, how people can apply to be appointed as the guardian of a child, and how people can become a guardian upon the death of a guardian. It also talks about the rights and obligations involved in being a guardian, parental responsibilities and parenting time, and about contact, the time that someone who isn't a guardian may have with a child.
Line 11: Line 11:
The provincial ''[[Family Law Act]]'' talks about the care of children in terms of ''guardians'' and the rights and duties they have for the children in their care. Most of the time a child's parents will be the child's guardians, but other people can be guardians too, including people who have a court order appointing them as guardians and people who are made guardians by a guardian's will.
The provincial ''[[Family Law Act]]'' talks about the care of children in terms of ''guardians'' and the rights and duties they have for the children in their care. Most of the time a child's parents will be the child's guardians, but other people can be guardians too, including people who have a court order appointing them as guardians and people who are made guardians by a guardian's will.


Guardians raise the children in their care by exercising ''parental responsibilities'' in the best interests of the children. Parental responsibilities include deciding where a child goes to school, how a sick child is treated, whether a child is raised in a religion, and what sports the child plays after school. All of a child's guardians can exercise all parental responsibilities, or parental responsibilities can be divided between guardians, so that only one or more guardians have the right to make decisions about a particular issue.
Guardians raise the children in their care by exercising ''parental responsibilities'' in the best interests of the children. Parental responsibilities include deciding where a child goes to school, how a sick child is treated, whether a child is raised in a religion, and what sports the child plays after school. All of a child's guardians can exercise all parental responsibilities, or parental responsibilities can be divided between guardians, so that only one or more guardians have the right to make decisions about a particular issue. The concept ''joint guardianship'' is not incorporated into the ''Family Law Act''; however many people, including judges, still use that language.


The time a guardian has with a child is called ''parenting time''. During parenting time, a guardian is responsible for the care of the child and has <span class="noglossary">decision-</span>making authority about day-to-day issues.
The time a guardian has with a child is called ''parenting time''. During parenting time, a guardian is responsible for the care of the child and has <span class="noglossary">decision-</span>making authority about day-to-day issues.
Line 38: Line 38:
===Being a guardian===
===Being a guardian===


People who are guardians because of the presumptions at s. 39 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' are guardians and don't need to ask for an order saying they are guardians. This is really important because if you don't need to start a court proceeding to become a guardian, you shouldn't.
People who are guardians because of the presumptions at s. 39 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' are guardians and don't need to ask for an order saying they are guardians. This is really important because if you don't need to start a court proceeding to become a guardian, you shouldn't. A parent does not need to ask the court for what he or she already has.


That said, it's unlikely that too many people are going to be aware of the presumptions of guardianship s. 39 talks about, and you may have problems dealing with people like doctors, teachers, police and border guards. First of all, it's unlikely that these people will have read the ''[[Family Law Act]]''. Secondly, how would they know that you lived with the other parent after the child's birth? What you might want to get is an agreement that says "Brenda is the guardian of the child Max," or the declaration of a judge, called a ''declaratory order'', confirming your status in relation to your child.
That said, it's unlikely that too many people are going to be aware of the presumptions of guardianship s. 39 talks about, and you may have problems dealing with people like doctors, teachers, police and border guards. First of all, it's unlikely that these people will have read the ''[[Family Law Act]]''. Secondly, how would they know that you lived with the other parent after the child's birth? What you might want to get is an agreement that says "Brenda is the guardian of the child Max," or the declaration of a judge, called a ''declaratory order'', confirming your status in relation to your child.
Line 74: Line 74:
Rule 18.1 also requires that the applicant supply a criminal records check and a records check from the Ministry for Children and Family Development dated within 60 days of the filing of the affidavit.
Rule 18.1 also requires that the applicant supply a criminal records check and a records check from the Ministry for Children and Family Development dated within 60 days of the filing of the affidavit.


Rule 15-2.1 of the [http://canlii.ca/t/8mcr Supreme Court Family Rules] says much the same thing but requires that the special affidavit, in Form F101, be sworn at least 28 days before a hearing where people will present arguments, or at least 7 days before filing if there will not be a hearing. The records checks must be done no more than 60 days before the date of the hearing.
Rule 15-2.1 of the [http://canlii.ca/t/8mcr Supreme Court Family Rules] says much the same thing and also requires that a special affidavit, in Form F101, be sworn at least 28 days before a hearing where people will present arguments, or at least 7 days before filing if there will not be a hearing. The records checks must be done no more than 60 days before the date of the hearing.


You can find links to and examples of forms, including Form 34 and Form F101, in [[Sample Provincial Court Forms (Family Law)|Provincial Court Forms & Examples]] and [[Sample Supreme Court Forms (Family)|Supreme Court Forms & Examples]].
You can find links to and examples of forms, including Form 34 and Form F101, in [[Sample Provincial Court Forms (Family Law)|Provincial Court Forms & Examples]] and [[Sample Supreme Court Forms (Family)|Supreme Court Forms & Examples]].
Line 136: Line 136:
When formal arrangements are required, s. 44 allows two or more of a child's guardians to make an agreement about the allocation of parental responsibilities and parenting time, as well as how disputes about those parenting arrangement will be resolved. (Agreements like these can't be made until the guardians have separated or are about to separate.) If agreement is impossible, a guardian can apply for a court order about parenting arrangements under s. 45 of the act.
When formal arrangements are required, s. 44 allows two or more of a child's guardians to make an agreement about the allocation of parental responsibilities and parenting time, as well as how disputes about those parenting arrangement will be resolved. (Agreements like these can't be made until the guardians have separated or are about to separate.) If agreement is impossible, a guardian can apply for a court order about parenting arrangements under s. 45 of the act.


When a child has more than one guardian, the guardians need to work together and cooperate in raising the children. This can sometimes be difficult, particularly when there is a lot of conflict in the guardians' relationship with one another. Before the ''Family Law Act'' came into effect, the rights and obligations involved in raising children were usually addressed through a joint guardianship order under the ''Family Relations Act'', in particular through two models of joint guardianship, the Horn model and the Joyce model. The ''Family Law Act'' doesn't talk about guardianship the way the old law did and can't be used to spell out guardians' rights and obligations in the same way. However, since guardians need to work together and cooperate in making parenting decisions, the models can still work. They just need to be changed a bit.
When a child has more than one guardian, the guardians need to work together and cooperate in raising the children. This can sometimes be difficult, particularly when there is a lot of conflict in the guardians' relationship with one another. Before the ''Family Law Act'' came into effect, the rights and obligations involved in raising children were usually addressed through a joint guardianship order under the ''Family Relations Act''. The ''Family Law Act'' doesn't talk about guardianship the way the old law did and can't be used to spell out guardians' rights and obligations.


===The Joyce model for sharing parental responsibilities===
The court can make orders about which guardian exercises parental responsibilities, so that one parent may have parental responsibilities over medical decisions, and the other over educational decisions. If the agreement or court order does not spell out who exercises which parental responsibility, then the guardians must cooperate and make their decisions jointly. If no agreement can be reached by the guardians, an application may be made to court under s. 40 of the ''Family Law Act'', and the court can make those decisions instead or determine who can make the decision.
 
The Joyce model, created by Mr. Justice Joyce, is fairly detailed and requires the guardians to consult with one another on all important decisions affecting the child, to make their best efforts to work together to reach a solution that is in the best interests of the child, and so forth. When guardians can't agree on a <span class="noglossary">decision</span>, the Joyce model might say that one guardian will have the last word, or it might say that the parents will try to mediate the issue, consult a child psychologist about the issue, or ask a judge for directions on the issue.
 
Here's the standard version of the Joyce model adapted for people who are guardians under the ''Family Law Act'':
 
<blockquote>The guardians will exercise all parental responsibilities with respect to the child on the following terms:</blockquote>
:#in the event of the death of a guardian, the surviving guardian(s) will be the only guardian(s) of the child,
:#each guardian will have the obligation to advise the other guardian(s) of any matters of a significant nature affecting the child,
:#each guardian will have the obligation to discuss with the other guardians any significant decisions that have to be made concerning the child, including significant decisions about the health (except emergency decisions), education, religious instruction, and general welfare,
:#the guardians will have the obligation to discuss significant decisions with each other and the obligation to try to reach agreement on those decisions,
:#in the event that the guardians cannot reach agreement on a significant <span class="noglossary">decision</span> despite their best efforts, the guardian with the majority of parenting time with the child will be entitled to make those decisions and the other guardian(s) will have the right to apply for directions on any <span class="noglossary">decision</span> the guardian(s) consider(s) contrary to the best interests of the child, under s. 49 of the ''Family Law Act'', and
:#each guardian will have the right to obtain information concerning the child directly from third parties, including but not limited to teachers, counsellors, medical professionals, and third-<span class="noglossary">party</span> caregivers.
 
You can download a version of the adapted Joyce model in PDF format in the resources section at the bottom of this page.
 
===The Horn model for sharing parental responsibilities===
 
The Horn model, created by Master Horn, is more about the guardians' rights to get information about the child, usually about the child's schooling, health, and extracurricular activities. The Horn model implies that the guardian with whom the child mostly lives will be entitled to make decisions about the child as he or she sees fit, with the other guardian having a right to information about the child. Under s. 49 of the ''Family Law Act'', however, the other guardian will always have the right to ask the court for directions on the subject of the other guardian's <span class="noglossary">decision</span>.
 
Here's the standard version of the Horn model adapted for people who are guardians under the ''Family Law Act'':
 
<blockquote>The guardian with the majority of parenting time with the child will exercise all parental responsibilities in respect of the child and the other guardian(s) will have the right:</blockquote>
:#to be informed of the child's medical and dental practitioners,
:#to contact the child's medical and dental practitioners and obtain the child's medical and dental records,
:#to be consulted about the selection of the child's alternative caregivers, such as daycare and preschool,
:#to consult with the children's alternative caregivers and teachers,
:#to be informed of events at the child's schools or daycare so that the parent without primary care may attend,
:#to be informed of parent/teacher nights so that the other guardian(s) may attend,
:#to be consulted about any significant health issues relating to the child, and
:#to be consulted about any significant change in the child's social environment.
 
You can download a version of the adapted Horn model in PDF format in the resources section at the bottom of this page.


==Contact==
==Contact==
Line 234: Line 202:
* [http://canlii.ca/t/85pb Provincial Court (Family) Rules]
* [http://canlii.ca/t/85pb Provincial Court (Family) Rules]
* [http://canlii.ca/t/8mcr Supreme Court Family Rules]
* [http://canlii.ca/t/8mcr Supreme Court Family Rules]
===Resources===
* [[Media:Guardianship_-_Joyce_Model.pdf|The Joyce model for sharing parental responsibilities]] (PDF)
* [[Media:Guardianship_-_Horn_Model.pdf|The Horn model for sharing parental responsibilities]] (PDF)


===Links===
===Links===
Line 248: Line 211:




{{REVIEWED | reviewer = [[JP Boyd]], May 19, 2013}}
{{REVIEWED | reviewer = [[Mary Mouat|Mary Mouat, QC]] and [[Justin Werb]], February 18, 2015}}


{{JP Boyd on Family Law Navbox|type=chapters}}
{{JP Boyd on Family Law Navbox|type=chapters}}

Navigation menu