3,009
edits
Difference between revisions of "Charter Rights: Overview"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Charter Rights: Overview (view source)
Revision as of 23:59, 28 November 2016
, 23:59, 28 November 2016→Enforcing Charter rights
Dial-A-Law (talk | contribs) |
Dial-A-Law (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
What a court can do depends on what you ask for. For example, if you say that a law violates the Charter, a court will decide if the law actually does violate the Charter. If the court finds a violation, the government can try to justify the violation under section 1. You may ask a court to declare that your personal rights have been violated or to give you a specific remedy. In criminal cases, for example, the accused person can ask the court to end the trial or to exclude evidence obtained in violation of the Charter. Or you may ask a court for a general remedy not specific to your case, such as striking down a law entirely. The court will generally assess these questions: | What a court can do depends on what you ask for. For example, if you say that a law violates the Charter, a court will decide if the law actually does violate the Charter. If the court finds a violation, the government can try to justify the violation under section 1. You may ask a court to declare that your personal rights have been violated or to give you a specific remedy. In criminal cases, for example, the accused person can ask the court to end the trial or to exclude evidence obtained in violation of the Charter. Or you may ask a court for a general remedy not specific to your case, such as striking down a law entirely. The court will generally assess these questions: | ||
:'''First: was your Charter right violated?''' | :'''First: was your Charter right violated?''' | ||
:You have to show the court that one of your Charter rights was violated. This usually means persuading the judge that the law or government action violated a specific Charter right. For example, you might complain that a law restricting what signs you can put in your window violates freedom of expression. But even if you prove a violation, Charter rights are balanced against the rights of others and the interests of society, as explained in the earlier paragraph on reasonable limits under section 1. | :You have to show the court that one of your Charter rights was violated. This usually means persuading the judge that the law or government action violated a specific Charter right. For example, you might complain that a law restricting what signs you can put in your window violates freedom of expression. But even if you prove a violation, Charter rights are balanced against the rights of others and the interests of society, as explained in the earlier paragraph on reasonable limits under section 1. | ||
: '''Second: can the government justify—under section 1—a law that violates the Charter right?''' | : '''Second: can the government justify—under section 1—a law that violates the Charter right?''' | ||
| Line 69: | Line 71: | ||
:The government must prove that the violation of the Charter is reasonable under section 1. Often, the government tries to show that the law’s '''objective''' is important to Canadian society, and that the violation of Charter rights is minimal. | :The government must prove that the violation of the Charter is reasonable under section 1. Often, the government tries to show that the law’s '''objective''' is important to Canadian society, and that the violation of Charter rights is minimal. | ||
:The more severe the violation, the harder it is for government to justify it. Only after the court considers all these things, can it decide if you deserve a remedy for the Charter violation. Charter cases can be complex and hard to resolve because courts have to consider and balance many competing interests. The court must go beyond the narrow facts of one case and consider the competing interests in relation to a law and how it operate for society. | :The more severe the violation, the harder it is for government to justify it. Only after the court considers all these things, can it decide if you deserve a remedy for the Charter violation. Charter cases can be complex and hard to resolve because courts have to consider and balance many competing interests. The court must go beyond the narrow facts of one case and consider the competing interests in relation to a law and how it operate for society. | ||
==Individual and broad remedies if Charter rights violated== | ==Individual and broad remedies if Charter rights violated== | ||