Difference between revisions of "ICBC and Personal Injury Claims (12:XII)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 90: Line 90:
#the plea of ''non est factum'' and want of ''consensus ad idem'' were unfounded in the circumstances.  
#the plea of ''non est factum'' and want of ''consensus ad idem'' were unfounded in the circumstances.  


The implication of the ''Mix'' judgment is that the presence of any of the above factors in a particular set of facts may be sufficient to invalidate a general release. Note, however, that the mere fact that a plaintiff’s injuries became more serious than he or she anticipated when signing a release will generally not invalidate the release.
The implication of the ''Mix'' judgment is that the presence of any of the above factors in a particular set of facts may be sufficient to invalidate a general release. Note, however, that the mere fact that a plaintiff’s injuries became more serious than he or she anticipated when signing a release will generally '''not''' invalidate the release.


== F. Plaintiff's Duty to Mitigate ==
== F. Plaintiff's Duty to Mitigate ==
5,109

edits

Navigation menu