Difference between revisions of "Talk:Family Violence"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
284 bytes removed ,  23:46, 5 May 2013
m
no edit summary
m
m
Line 19: Line 19:
This is outside the realm of copy editing, but I found it strange that a chapter on Family Violence would start off with a discussion of tort law. . .  If I was doing a substantive edit, I would move up the call the police, call VictimLink to be the lead items, and go on from there. The website has a how-to focus rather than a learning focus, and is for people who are dealing with the issue under discussion (and their intermediaries).
This is outside the realm of copy editing, but I found it strange that a chapter on Family Violence would start off with a discussion of tort law. . .  If I was doing a substantive edit, I would move up the call the police, call VictimLink to be the lead items, and go on from there. The website has a how-to focus rather than a learning focus, and is for people who are dealing with the issue under discussion (and their intermediaries).
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
==Section on Drawbacks of tort claims==
In 3.1, the '''Drawbacks of tort claims''' there is a sentence in para 3 that begins, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' . . .  Is this in context here?
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)
2,443

edits

Navigation menu