1,399
edits
Difference between revisions of "Separating Emotionally"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Resolving the issues
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) (→Links) |
|||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
Unless there is a pressing and manifest urgency, in my view negotiation and mediation are to be preferred over litigation. While it is absolutely true that in some situations court is the only way out, most people can find compromise no matter how wound up their emotional states happen to be. | Unless there is a pressing and manifest urgency, in my view negotiation and mediation are to be preferred over litigation. While it is absolutely true that in some situations court is the only way out, most people can find compromise no matter how wound up their emotional states happen to be. | ||
In ''The Truth about Children and Divorce'', Dr. Emery describes three general categories of divorcing couples: the angry divorce, the distant divorce, and the cooperative divorce. While these categories are not exactly exhaustive and are drawn from an American legal construct, they are useful in discussing the impact of emotional separation on negotiation, mediation, and litigation. | In ''The Truth about Children and Divorce'', Dr. Emery describes three general categories of divorcing couples: the angry divorce, the distant divorce, and the cooperative divorce. While these categories are not exactly exhaustive and are drawn from an American legal construct, they are useful in discussing the impact of an emotional separation on negotiation, mediation, and litigation. | ||
===The cooperative separation=== | ===The cooperative separation=== | ||