15
edits
Difference between revisions of "Same Sex Relationships and Issues Affecting Transgender and Transsexual People"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Same Sex Relationships and Issues Affecting Transgender and Transsexual People (view source)
Revision as of 00:12, 28 January 2020
, 00:12, 28 January 2020→Children
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
<blockquote>"Having considered the form of consent signed by A.B. and the evidence of [his psychologist, his physician, and his psychiatrist] I am satisfied that A.B.'s health care providers have explained to A.B. the nature and consequences as well as the foreseeable benefits and risks of the treatment recommended by them, that A.B. understands those explanations and the health care providers have concluded that such health care is in A.B.'s best interests."</blockquote> | <blockquote>"Having considered the form of consent signed by A.B. and the evidence of [his psychologist, his physician, and his psychiatrist] I am satisfied that A.B.'s health care providers have explained to A.B. the nature and consequences as well as the foreseeable benefits and risks of the treatment recommended by them, that A.B. understands those explanations and the health care providers have concluded that such health care is in A.B.'s best interests."</blockquote> | ||
A.B.'s case has been before the Court of Appeal of BC three times since the 2019 decision by the Supreme Court. In ''A.B. v. C.D.'', 2020 BCCA 11, the Court of Appeal, in essence, upheld A.B.'s right to consent to gender transition treatment. Of note is that the Court did not take issue with the lower court's ruling regarding family violence. A.B.'s father kept referring to A.B. using female pronouns and using his birth name. The Supreme Court ruled that this behaviour constituted family violence. The Court of Appeal thought so too. | A.B.'s case has been before the Court of Appeal of BC three times since the 2019 decision by the Supreme Court. In ''A.B. v. C.D.'', [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2020/2020bcca11/2020bcca11.html?resultIndex=1 2020 BCCA 11], the Court of Appeal, in essence, upheld A.B.'s right to consent to gender transition treatment. Of note is that the Court did not take issue with the lower court's ruling regarding family violence. A.B.'s father kept referring to A.B. using female pronouns and using his birth name. The Supreme Court ruled that this behaviour constituted family violence. The Court of Appeal thought so too. | ||
===Child support=== | ===Child support=== | ||