Difference between revisions of "Other Issues in Criminal Matters (1:VIII)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:
The vulnerable sector check includes a level 4 check plus any sexual offences and convictions which a records suspension was granted. A criminal record does not include convictions under provincial laws like under the ''Motor Vehicle Act'', RSBC 1996, c 318.  
The vulnerable sector check includes a level 4 check plus any sexual offences and convictions which a records suspension was granted. A criminal record does not include convictions under provincial laws like under the ''Motor Vehicle Act'', RSBC 1996, c 318.  


==== a) How will a criminal record affect my ability to travel? ====
=== 3. How will a criminal record affect my ability to travel? ===
Each individual country controls entry to its territory and the impact of a criminal record will vary depending on where a person is trying to travel (and often the person working at customs). Canada and the US share a great deal of intelligence, such as CPIC, and American authorities will use this information when deciding whether or not to admit a person. A criminal conviction could be grounds to deny entry. While discharges are not convictions under Canadian law, American authorities do not make this distinction. Also, information that is purged from CPIC, which was accessed by the American database prior to it being purged from CPIC, may not be erased from American databases. Thus, a criminal history could affect a person’s ability to travel, but the exact impact will depend entirely on the policies of the host country.  
Each individual country controls entry to its territory and the impact of a criminal record will vary depending on where a person is trying to travel (and often the person working at customs). Canada and the US share a great deal of intelligence, such as CPIC, and American authorities will use this information when deciding whether or not to admit a person. A criminal conviction could be grounds to deny entry. While discharges are not convictions under Canadian law, American authorities do not make this distinction. Also, information that is purged from CPIC, which was accessed by the American database prior to it being purged from CPIC, may not be erased from American databases. Thus, a criminal history could affect a person’s ability to travel, but the exact impact will depend entirely on the policies of the host country.  


===== Inadmissibility to the United States =====
==== Inadmissibility to the United States ====
Admissibility to the U.S.A. is determined in accordance with the ''Immigration and Nationality Act'' (1952), Public Law No 82-414, 66 Stat 163) [“''INA''”]. Section 212(a)(2)(A) of the ''INA'' states that a person is inadmissible if they commit a crime involving “moral turpitude” (i.e., shocks the public conscience; see Wing v United States 46 f2d 755 (7th Cir 1931) for a detailed definition), or violates any law relating to a controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the ''Controlled Substances Act'' (21 USC 802)).  A person is also inadmissible to the United States if they commit two or more criminal offences whose convictions have an aggregate sentence of five years or more.  Finally, an immigration officer can deny entry into the US if they have “reason to believe” that the individual has committed drug trafficking, prostitution, or money laundering offences.   
Admissibility to the U.S.A. is determined in accordance with the ''Immigration and Nationality Act'' (1952), Public Law No 82-414, 66 Stat 163) [“''INA''”]. Section 212(a)(2)(A) of the ''INA'' states that a person is inadmissible if they commit a crime involving “moral turpitude” (i.e., shocks the public conscience; see Wing v United States 46 f2d 755 (7th Cir 1931) for a detailed definition), or violates any law relating to a controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the ''Controlled Substances Act'' (21 USC 802)).  A person is also inadmissible to the United States if they commit two or more criminal offences whose convictions have an aggregate sentence of five years or more.  Finally, an immigration officer can deny entry into the US if they have “reason to believe” that the individual has committed drug trafficking, prostitution, or money laundering offences.   


:'''NOTE:''' A conviction as defined in s 101(a)(48)(A) of the ''INA'' includes any form of punishment, penalty, or restraint of liberty, which is ordered by the court.  This means that conditional discharges and suspended sentences would be considered convictions. Consult '''Chapter 18: Immigration Law''' for more information.  
:'''NOTE:''' A conviction as defined in s 101(a)(48)(A) of the ''INA'' includes any form of punishment, penalty, or restraint of liberty, which is ordered by the court.  This means that conditional discharges and suspended sentences would be considered convictions. Consult '''Chapter 18: Immigration Law''' for more information.  


==== b) Elimination of records ====
=== 4. Elimination of records ===
However, if a person is found guilty of an adult ''Criminal Code'' offence within 3 years following the completion of a sentence for a criminal youth summary conviction offence or within 5 years of completion of a sentence for a criminal youth indictable offence then their youth record is re-opened and remains part of the person’s permanent record under youth convictions.   
All youth convictions are sealed at the time the person turns 18 years old. However, if a person is found guilty of an adult ''Criminal Code'' offence within 3 years following the completion of a sentence for a criminal youth summary conviction offence or within 5 years of completion of a sentence for a criminal youth indictable offence then their youth record is re-opened and remains part of the person’s permanent record under youth convictions.   


The time calculation under this section of the ''Youth Court Justice Act'' is complicated.  As such, occasionally, mistakes are made and if one sees a Youth Record as part of an accused’s criminal record, the time requirements for re-opening that youth record should be double-checked.   
The time calculation under this section of the ''Youth Court Justice Act'' is complicated.  As such, occasionally, mistakes are made and if one sees a Youth Record as part of an accused’s criminal record, the time requirements for re-opening that youth record should be double-checked.   

Navigation menu