Difference between revisions of "Creditors' Remedies against Debtors (10:III)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:
:'''NOTE:''' Section 4 lists types of transactions that are exempt from the ''PPSA''. The ''PPSA'' does not apply to a “lien, charge or other interest given by a rule of law or an enactment unless the enactment contains an express provision that the ''PPSA'' applies”. Generally this excludes real property and natural resources.  
:'''NOTE:''' Section 4 lists types of transactions that are exempt from the ''PPSA''. The ''PPSA'' does not apply to a “lien, charge or other interest given by a rule of law or an enactment unless the enactment contains an express provision that the ''PPSA'' applies”. Generally this excludes real property and natural resources.  


==== a) Perfection ====
=== 4. Perfection ===


For a creditor’s interest in a good to be practically effective,  s 35(1)(b) of the ''PPSA'' states that the interest must be “perfected”, whereby the  creditor becomes a “secured” party. By virtue of s 19, a security interest must satisfy two conditions to be “perfected”:  
For a creditor’s interest in a good to be practically effective,  s 35(1)(b) of the ''PPSA'' states that the interest must be “perfected”, whereby the  creditor becomes a “secured” party. By virtue of s 19, a security interest must satisfy two conditions to be “perfected”:  
Line 46: Line 46:
*iii) except for the purpose of enforcing rights between the parties to the security agreement, the security interest becomes enforceable under s 10 (unless  the parties specifically agreed to postpone the time for attachment in which case the security interest will attach at the time specified in the agreement).
*iii) except for the purpose of enforcing rights between the parties to the security agreement, the security interest becomes enforceable under s 10 (unless  the parties specifically agreed to postpone the time for attachment in which case the security interest will attach at the time specified in the agreement).


=== 4. Methods of Perfection ===
=== a) Methods of Perfection ===


*i) '''perfection by possession of collateral applies to all forms of security interests (s 24)''';  
:i) '''perfection by possession of collateral applies to all forms of security interests (s 24)''';  


*ii) '''perfection by registration'''. Subject to s 19, registration of a financing statement in the Personal Property Registry perfects a security interest in collateral. (s 25); and
:ii) '''perfection by registration'''. Subject to s 19, registration of a financing statement in the Personal Property Registry perfects a security interest in collateral. (s 25); and


*iii) '''temporary perfection''' (See ss 5(3), 7(3), 26, 28(3), 29(4) and 51).
:iii) '''temporary perfection''' (See ss 5(3), 7(3), 26, 28(3), 29(4) and 51).


=== 5. Remedies ===
=== 5. Remedies ===
Line 184: Line 184:
:'''NOTE:''' The “seize or sue” rule does not apply to “true leases” but ''will'' apply to “security leases” or “conditional sales agreements”.  BC courts have been developing tests to distinguish between true leases and security leases. Disputes often arise over car leases. Creditors and debtors should consult with a lawyer who is familiar with this area of law when trying to figure out whether their contract is a true lease or a security lease. If the lease is a true lease the creditor has the option to seize and sue; see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2007/2007bcca144/2007bcca144.html?autocompleteStr=Daimler%20Chrysler%20Services%20Canada%20Inc%20v%20Cameron%2C%202007%20BCCA%20144&autocompletePos=1 Daimler Chrysler Services Canada Inc v Cameron'', 2007 BCCA 144].  
:'''NOTE:''' The “seize or sue” rule does not apply to “true leases” but ''will'' apply to “security leases” or “conditional sales agreements”.  BC courts have been developing tests to distinguish between true leases and security leases. Disputes often arise over car leases. Creditors and debtors should consult with a lawyer who is familiar with this area of law when trying to figure out whether their contract is a true lease or a security lease. If the lease is a true lease the creditor has the option to seize and sue; see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2007/2007bcca144/2007bcca144.html?autocompleteStr=Daimler%20Chrysler%20Services%20Canada%20Inc%20v%20Cameron%2C%202007%20BCCA%20144&autocompletePos=1 Daimler Chrysler Services Canada Inc v Cameron'', 2007 BCCA 144].  


==== c) Consequences of Electing to Proceed Against Collateral ====
=== 13. Consequences of Electing to Proceed Against Collateral ===


Under s 67(2), an election to proceed against the collateral results in the extinguishment of the debtor’s obligations under the security agreement or any related agreement (with the exception of land mortgages executed before July 1, 1973), thereby automatically releasing any guarantor or indemnitor of the obligations contained in the security agreement.  However, ss 67(3) and 67(4) contain exceptions.
Under s 67(2), an election to proceed against the collateral results in the extinguishment of the debtor’s obligations under the security agreement or any related agreement (with the exception of land mortgages executed before July 1, 1973), thereby automatically releasing any guarantor or indemnitor of the obligations contained in the security agreement.  However, ss 67(3) and 67(4) contain exceptions.
Line 191: Line 191:




==== d) Consequences of Electing to Sue ====
=== 14. Consequences of Electing to Sue ===


'''An election to sue results in the following consequences for the creditor:'''
'''An election to sue results in the following consequences for the creditor:'''
Line 217: Line 217:
==== a) Money to be Levied by Execution ====
==== a) Money to be Levied by Execution ====


Under s 3, once the sheriff collects money, an event called a levy, the persons who qualify under the Act distribute it. These persons must  have filed a writ of execution prior to the levy or must file a writ within one month of the date notice of the levy was entered. Where the creditor does not have a judgment against the debtor at the time of levy, and the claim is for debt, the creditor may obtain a certificate of claim under  the ''Creditor Assistance Act''. If this certificate is delivered to the sheriff within one month of the levy, the creditor may participate in the rateable distribution. The procedure for the certificate of claim is in ss 6 – 21 of the Act.  
Under s 3, once the sheriff collects money, an event called a levy, the persons who qualify under the Act will distribute it. These persons must  have filed a writ of execution prior to the levy or must file a writ within one month of the date notice of the levy was entered. Where the creditor does not have a judgment against the debtor at the time of levy, and the claim is for debt, the creditor may obtain a certificate of claim under  the ''Creditor Assistance Act''. If this certificate is delivered to the sheriff within one month of the levy, the creditor may participate in the rateable distribution. The procedure for the certificate of claim is in ss 6 – 21 of the Act.  


==== b) Contest of the Creditor’s Claim ====
==== b) Contest of the Creditor’s Claim ====
Line 223: Line 223:
'''Under s 14, on receiving an affidavit of claim the execution debtor may file and serve an affidavit of good defense to the claim within 10  days of the original service.''' The court may vary this length of time upon application. The distribution is halted pending verification of the validity of the claim.  
'''Under s 14, on receiving an affidavit of claim the execution debtor may file and serve an affidavit of good defense to the claim within 10  days of the original service.''' The court may vary this length of time upon application. The distribution is halted pending verification of the validity of the claim.  


Besides the debtor, another creditor may contest the claim (s 15). Grounds for filing include an allegation that there is no debt due in good faith from the debtor to the claimant, or an allegation that the claim is not one of debt as required by s 6 of the ''Creditor Assistance Act''. A claimant whose claim is contested must make an application to the Supreme Court of British Columbia within eight days of being notified; otherwise, the claim will be deemed to have been abandoned.
Besides the debtor, another creditor may contest the claim (s 15). Grounds for filing include an allegation that there is no debt due in good faith from the debtor to the claimant, or an allegation that the claim is not one of debt as required by s 6 of the ''Creditor Assistance Act''. A claimant whose claim is contested must make an application to the Supreme Court of British Columbia within eight days of being notified (s 16); otherwise, the claim will be deemed to have been abandoned.


Under s 12, if the amount levied does not satisfy all of the writs of execution and certificates of claim, the sheriff is authorized to make a further seizure of the execution debtor’s personal property to satisfy all writs and certificates of claim.  In addition, the certificate, if issued, remains in force for three years and may be renewed similarly to a writ of execution (s 13(1) and (2)).
Under s 12, if the amount levied does not satisfy all of the writs of execution and certificates of claim, the sheriff is authorized to make a further seizure of the execution debtor’s personal property to satisfy all writs and certificates of claim.  In addition, the certificate, if issued, remains in force for three years and may be renewed similarly to a writ of execution (s 13(1) and (2)).
Line 237: Line 237:
#$4,000 for household furnishings and appliances;  
#$4,000 for household furnishings and appliances;  
#$5,000 for one motor vehicle if the debtor is not a maintenance debtor;   
#$5,000 for one motor vehicle if the debtor is not a maintenance debtor;   
#$2,000 for one motor vehicle if the debtor is a maintenance debtor;  
#$2,000 for one motor vehicle if the debtor is a maintenance debtor; and
#$10,000 for tools and other personal property that the debtor uses in their occupation.  
#$10,000 for tools and other personal property that the debtor uses in their occupation.  
:'''NOTE:''' See the COEA Exemption Regulations.


In addition, s 71.1(1) of  the ''COEA'' exempts the principal residence of the debtor; $12,000 is the prescribed amount of equity exemption if the debtor's principal residence is located within the boundaries of the Capital Regional District or the Greater Vancouver Regional District. If the debtor’s principal residence is located outside of these boundaries, $9,000 is the prescribed amount of equity exemption. These values are calculated using the net equity.   
In addition, s 71.1(1) of  the ''COEA'' exempts the principal residence of the debtor; $12,000 is the prescribed amount of equity exemption if the debtor's principal residence is located within the boundaries of the Capital Regional District or the Greater Vancouver Regional District. If the debtor’s principal residence is located outside of these boundaries, $9,000 is the prescribed amount of equity exemption. These values are calculated using the net equity.   
Line 275: Line 277:
:'''NOTE:''' Issues relating to land should be referred to a lawyer.
:'''NOTE:''' Issues relating to land should be referred to a lawyer.
If the judgment creditor registers a judgment in any Land Title Office, a lien is created against the interest in the real property of the judgment debtor that is registered in the land registration district in which the judgment is registered (s 82 of ''Court Order Enforcement Act'').  Once a judgment is registered, the judgment creditor may seek a court order to have the sheriff sell the land (ss 92 and 96). If the land is held in joint ownership and the debt is in one owner’s name only, the enforcement proceedings are similar, but a creditor can only apply to have the judgment debtor’s portion of the land sold. In this case, the debtor’s joint tenancy interest is considered severed. The buyer/new owner of the partial interest in the land can be the judgment creditor, a third party, or the non-debtor owner. After the sale of the land, the new owner or the remaining non-debtor owner can bring an application under the Partition of Property Act to ‘buy out’ the new owner. '''The judgment creditor must renew the judgment after two years or it is extinguished''' (ss 83 and 91, COEA), unless it is a non-expiring judgment (i.e. a judgment registered under the ''Family Maintenance Enforcement Act'').
If the judgment creditor registers a judgment in any Land Title Office, a lien is created against the interest in the real property of the judgment debtor that is registered in the land registration district in which the judgment is registered (s 82 of ''Court Order Enforcement Act'').  Once a judgment is registered, the judgment creditor may seek a court order to have the sheriff sell the land (ss 92 and 96). If the land is held in joint ownership and the debt is in one owner’s name only, the enforcement proceedings are similar, but a creditor can only apply to have the judgment debtor’s portion of the land sold. In this case, the debtor’s joint tenancy interest is considered severed. The buyer/new owner of the partial interest in the land can be the judgment creditor, a third party, or the non-debtor owner. After the sale of the land, the new owner or the remaining non-debtor owner can bring an application under the Partition of Property Act to ‘buy out’ the new owner. '''The judgment creditor must renew the judgment after two years or it is extinguished''' (ss 83 and 91, COEA), unless it is a non-expiring judgment (i.e. a judgment registered under the ''Family Maintenance Enforcement Act'').
:'''NOTE: Where there is a conflict between the ''PPSA'' and the ''Land Title Act'', the ''Land Title Act'' prevails (''PPSA'', s 74).'''
:'''NOTE: Where there is a conflict between the ''PPSA'' and the ''Land Title Act'', the ''Land Title Act'' prevails (''PPSA'', s 74) except in regards to ss 36, 37, and 49 of the PPSA.'''


==== c) Legal Advice on Execution Orders ====
==== c) Legal Advice on Execution Orders ====
Line 287: Line 289:
=== 5. Garnishment of Bank Accounts and other Accounts Receivable ===
=== 5. Garnishment of Bank Accounts and other Accounts Receivable ===


==== a) Garnishment Before or After Judgement ====
==== a) Garnishment Before or After Judgment ====


A pre-judgment garnishing order is paid into court pending the outcome of the proceedings, and may be used in circumstances where the debtors ability to pay may be compromised before judgment.  A pre-judgment garnishing order is not available against wages.  The creditor’s action against the debtor must be for a liquidated (i.e. explicitly specified) or ascertained sum.  - damages for a breach of contract must be quantified as a term of that contract (see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2010/2010bcsc409/2010bcsc409.html?autocompleteStr=Ocean%20Floors%20Ltd%20v%20Crocan%20Construction%20Ltd%20(2010)%2C%202010%20BCSC%20409&autocompletePos=1 Ocean Floors Ltd v Crocan Construction Ltd'' (2010), 2010 BCSC 409]).  A definition of liquidated sum is found in ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2005/2005bcsc920/2005bcsc920.html?autocompleteStr=Steele%20v%20Riverside%20Forest%20Products%20Ltd%20(2005)%2C%202005%20BCSC%20920&autocompletePos=1 Steele v Riverside Forest Products Ltd'' (2005), 2005 BCSC 920]. The accompanying affidavit to a pre-judgment garnishing order must disclose the nature of the cause of action and the specified amount claimed.  Note that recourse to a pre-judgment garnishing order is extraordinary and therefore the provisions of the ''COEA'' must be strictly complied with or it may be overturned. The creditor will generally swear an affidavit in support of a pre-judgment garnishing order by themself.
A pre-judgment garnishing order is paid into court pending the outcome of the proceedings, and may be used in circumstances where the debtors ability to pay may be compromised before judgment.  A pre-judgment garnishing order is not available against wages.  The creditor’s action against the debtor must be for a liquidated (i.e. explicitly specified) or ascertained sum.  - damages for a breach of contract must be quantified as a term of that contract (see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2010/2010bcsc409/2010bcsc409.html?autocompleteStr=Ocean%20Floors%20Ltd%20v%20Crocan%20Construction%20Ltd%20(2010)%2C%202010%20BCSC%20409&autocompletePos=1 Ocean Floors Ltd v Crocan Construction Ltd'' (2010), 2010 BCSC 409]).  A definition of liquidated sum is found in ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2005/2005bcsc920/2005bcsc920.html?autocompleteStr=Steele%20v%20Riverside%20Forest%20Products%20Ltd%20(2005)%2C%202005%20BCSC%20920&autocompletePos=1 Steele v Riverside Forest Products Ltd'' (2005), 2005 BCSC 920]. The accompanying affidavit to a pre-judgment garnishing order must disclose the nature of the cause of action and the specified amount claimed.  Note that recourse to a pre-judgment garnishing order is extraordinary and therefore the provisions of the ''COEA'' must be strictly complied with or it may be overturned. The creditor will generally swear an affidavit in support of a pre-judgment garnishing order by themself.
Line 294: Line 296:


If the order has not yet been made and the debt is valid, it may be in the debtor’s best interest to pay the creditor if possible, since the debtor is liable for payment of the costs of the garnishing proceedings.  
If the order has not yet been made and the debt is valid, it may be in the debtor’s best interest to pay the creditor if possible, since the debtor is liable for payment of the costs of the garnishing proceedings.  
If the order has already been made, the creditor should examine the  possibility of having the garnishment released and an order for payment by instalments substituted under s 5, or in the case of garnishment of  wages, having the exemption lowered under s 4. The creditor should be advised that hardship may be used as a defence.


Typically, it is the debtor who applies for a release of a garnishment order to substitute for an order for payment by instalments. However, if the order has already been made, the creditor should examine the possibility of having the garnishment released and an order for payment by instalments substituted under s 5. The creditor can also seek to have exemptions lowered in the case of garnishment of wages under s 4, resulting in the debt being repaid faster. The creditor should be advised that hardship may be used as a defence.  
Typically, it is the debtor who applies for a release of a garnishment order to substitute for an order for payment by instalments. However, if the order has already been made, the creditor should examine the possibility of having the garnishment released and an order for payment by instalments substituted under s 5. The creditor can also seek to have exemptions lowered in the case of garnishment of wages under s 4, resulting in the debt being repaid faster. The creditor should be advised that hardship may be used as a defence.  


A garnishee who wishes to dispute indebtedness to the defendant or judgment debtor, should file a dispute notice as soon as possible with the court. If they do not dispute it, a second order, called an order absolute may be issued (see [[Relevant Forms for Creditors%27 Remedies (10:App A) | Appendix A: List of Relevant Documents]]: '''Affidavit in Support of Garnishing Order After Judgment'''). This order operates as a judgment and execution may be taken against him or her. '''Inactivity could render a garnishee liable even if they never owed the money to the defendant/judgment debtor.'''  
A garnishee who wishes to dispute indebtedness to the defendant or judgment debtor, should file a dispute notice as soon as possible with the court. If they do not dispute it, a second order, called an order absolute may be issued (see [[Relevant Forms for Creditors%27 Remedies (10:App A) | Appendix A: List of Relevant Documents]]: '''Affidavit in Support of Garnishing Order After Judgment'''). This order operates as a judgment and execution may be taken against the garnishee. '''Inactivity could render a garnishee liable even if they never owed the money to the defendant/judgment debtor.'''  


==== b) Which Debts Can be Garnished? ====
==== b) Which Debts Can be Garnished? ====


Any debt that is “due or accruing due” to a judgment debtor may be garnished by a judgment creditor. This requires that the debt be an existing or perfected debt even though payment is not yet due. Bank accounts can be garnished as long as it is not a joint bank account, except where the debt is owed jointly by the same parties or the creditor is exercising its right of offset. For example, a creditor bank may garnish a debtor’s personal account, including a joint account, to offset the debtor’s debts to that bank where the amounts owed to each joint account holder can be determined. Term deposits may be garnished as long as any conditions on withdrawal are mere matters of procedure and administration, though there may be complications where the account is transferable.
Any debt that is “due or accruing due” to a judgment debtor may be garnished by a judgment creditor. This requires that the debt be an existing or perfected debt even though payment is not yet due. Bank accounts can be garnished as long as it is not a joint bank account. Garnishment against joint bank accounts can only occur when there is a court judgement against all joint account holders. For example, a creditor bank may garnish a debtor’s personal account, including a joint account, to offset the debtor’s debts to that bank after a determination of how much of the account’s value each joint account holder is entitled to. Term deposits may be garnished as long as any conditions on withdrawal are mere matters of procedure and administration, though there may be complications where the account is transferable.


'''Registered plans such as RRSPs and RRIFs are exempt from enforcement processes under s 71.3 of the ''COEA''.''' However, contributions made in the 12 months preceding the date of judgment may be enforced on. Also, many pension plan payments are exempt pursuant to s 63 of the ''Pension  Benefits Standards Act''. Section 15 of the ''COEA'' provides that a creditor may seek a garnishing order that will attach a debt maturing in  the future. This form of garnishing order may be useful in attaching monthly payments, since all future monthly payments can be attached by one order rather than issuing a garnishing order for each payment.   
'''Registered plans such as RRSPs and RRIFs are exempt from enforcement processes under s 71.3 of the ''COEA''.''' However, contributions made in the 12 months preceding the date of judgment may be enforced on. Also, many pension plan payments are exempt pursuant to s 63 of the ''Pension  Benefits Standards Act''. Section 15 of the ''COEA'' provides that a creditor may seek a garnishing order that will attach a debt maturing in  the future. This form of garnishing order may be useful in attaching monthly payments, since all future monthly payments can be attached by one order rather than issuing a garnishing order for each payment.   
Line 333: Line 333:
==== e) Payment by Instalments ====
==== e) Payment by Instalments ====


A debtor against whom a garnishing order has been made may apply for a release of the garnishing order, and for an order for the payment of the debt by instalments on the basis of hardship.  This order, if granted (it is rare), will bind the debtor’s creditors, but will only continue for as long as the debtor is not in default on any payment for more than five days, and so long as no other garnishing order is issued against them for any other debt (s 5). There is an exception where a creditor who elects to have a garnishing order changed to payment by instalments will be barred from seeking a garnishing order after the debtor defaults (see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1984/1984canlii332/1984canlii332.html?autocompleteStr=Bank%20of%20Montreal%20v%20Monsell%20&autocompletePos=1 Bank of Montreal v Monsell'' (1994), 58 BCLR 11 (SC)]). The creditor may apply to have the order  varied if new evidence of the debtor’s finances comes to light.
A debtor against whom a garnishing order has been made may apply for a release of the garnishing order, and for an order for the payment of the debt by instalments on the basis of hardship.  This order, if granted, will bind the debtor’s creditors, but will only continue for as long as the debtor is not in default on any payment for more than five days, and so long as no other garnishing order is issued against them for any other debt (s 5). There is an exception where a creditor who elects to have a garnishing order changed to payment by instalments will be barred from seeking a garnishing order after the debtor defaults (see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1984/1984canlii332/1984canlii332.html?autocompleteStr=Bank%20of%20Montreal%20v%20Monsell%20&autocompletePos=1 Bank of Montreal v Monsell'' (1994), 58 BCLR 11 (SC)]). The creditor may apply to have the order  varied if new evidence of the debtor’s finances comes to light.


=== 6. Garnishment of Wages ===
=== 6. Garnishment of Wages ===
Line 369: Line 369:
It is possible to register a B.C. judgment in many foreign jurisdictions, including other Canadian provinces.  The requirements for registration may differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, so the judgment creditor should consult with counsel in the destination jurisdiction to determine the specific requirements. A s 30 application to B.C. courts gives the court jurisdiction to issue a certificate in a reciprocating jurisdiction.
It is possible to register a B.C. judgment in many foreign jurisdictions, including other Canadian provinces.  The requirements for registration may differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, so the judgment creditor should consult with counsel in the destination jurisdiction to determine the specific requirements. A s 30 application to B.C. courts gives the court jurisdiction to issue a certificate in a reciprocating jurisdiction.


It is also possible, and sometimes more efficient, to sue on the judgment in the province or country where the judgment debtor’s assets are located.  Normally the foreign court requires a certificate.  To obtain a certificate in BC, creditors must file an application to the court that asks for a certificate to be issued (''COEA'' s 30).
It is also possible, and sometimes more efficient, to sue on the judgment in the province or country where the judgment debtor’s assets are located.  Normally the foreign court requires a certificate.  A s 30 application to B.C. courts gives the court jurisdiction to issue a certificate in a reciprocating jurisdiction.


== C. Unsecured Creditors: Remedies and Options Before Judgment (Liens) ==
== C. Unsecured Creditors: Remedies and Options Before Judgment (Liens) ==
Line 377: Line 377:
=== 1. Liens on Land (Builder’s Liens) ===
=== 1. Liens on Land (Builder’s Liens) ===


:'''NOTE:''' Builder’s lien issues involve limitation periods and real property registrations and filings. The '''time limitations are extremely  strict'''; solicitors have been known to lose suits because they filed a day late. '''All cases should be referred to a lawyer.''' Refer to: ''Builder’s Lien Act'', SBC 1997, c 45.  
:'''NOTE:''' Builder’s lien issues involve limitation periods and real property registrations and filings. The '''time limitations are extremely  strict'''; solicitors have been known to lose suits because they filed a day late. '''All cases should be immediately referred to a lawyer.''' Refer to: ''Builder’s Lien Act'', SBC 1997, c 45.  


Under the current ''Builder’s Lien Act'', a worker, material supplier, contractor, or sub-contractor who does or causes to be done any work  upon, or supplies material, or both, for an improvement, has a lien for the price of the work and material, upon the interest of the owner in the improvement, upon the improvement itself, upon the material delivered to the land, and upon the land itself (s 2). “Price” does not include interest on outstanding accounts or court-ordered interest: see ''Horseman Bros. Holdings Ltd v Lee'' (1985), 12 CLR 145 (BCCA).  
Under the current ''Builder’s Lien Act'', a worker, material supplier, contractor, or sub-contractor who does or causes to be done any work  upon, or supplies material, or both, for an improvement, has a lien for the price of the work and material, upon the interest of the owner in the improvement, upon the improvement itself, upon the material delivered to the land, and upon the land itself (s 2). “Price” does not include interest on outstanding accounts or court-ordered interest: see ''Horseman Bros. Holdings Ltd v Lee'' (1985), 12 CLR 145 (BCCA).  
Line 405: Line 405:
Under the ''Repairer’s Lien Act'' [''RLA''] RSBC 1996, c 404 [''RLA''] every mechanic or other person who has bestowed money, skill or materials upon any chattel for its improvement, has a common-law possessory lien on the chattel while it remains in their possession.  The lienholder may keep the chattel until paid. Where the person holds the chattel for 90 days, they may sell it upon compliance with statutory provisions (s 2).  If the lienholder gives up possession prior to filing a lien, they lose the lien (except with liens on automobiles and aircraft, etc.) and are restricted to ordinary remedies in court.
Under the ''Repairer’s Lien Act'' [''RLA''] RSBC 1996, c 404 [''RLA''] every mechanic or other person who has bestowed money, skill or materials upon any chattel for its improvement, has a common-law possessory lien on the chattel while it remains in their possession.  The lienholder may keep the chattel until paid. Where the person holds the chattel for 90 days, they may sell it upon compliance with statutory provisions (s 2).  If the lienholder gives up possession prior to filing a lien, they lose the lien (except with liens on automobiles and aircraft, etc.) and are restricted to ordinary remedies in court.


=== 3) Liens on Automobiles, Aircrafts, Boats and Outboard Motors ===
=== 3. Liens on Automobiles, Aircrafts, Boats and Outboard Motors ===


If a garage keeper relinquishes possession of an automobile, aircraft, boat or outboard motor, they do not lose the lien, provided that the debtor,  before giving up possession, signed an acknowledgement of indebtedness (e.g. invoice, statement of account, etc.) (s 3(1)).
If a garage keeper relinquishes possession of an automobile, aircraft, boat or outboard motor, they do not lose the lien, provided that the debtor,  before giving up possession, signed an acknowledgement of indebtedness (e.g. invoice, statement of account, etc.) (s 3(1)).
Line 421: Line 421:
=== 4. Buyer’s Lien ===
=== 4. Buyer’s Lien ===


When a buyer has made a partial or full payment to a seller - and the goods are unascertained or future consumer goods, the buyer can place a lien against all goods that are in, or will come into, the possession of the seller that correspond with the description or sample of goods agreed upon (See Part 9 of the ''Sale of Goods Act''). This holds as long as the goods were not sold to someone else. The buyer also has a lien against any bank account where the seller normally deposits  the  proceeds  of  sales.  This  lien  has  priority  over  all  other  security  interests, but generally is not valid in bankruptcy. Generally, provincial liens will only be recognized in bankruptcy if the specific property can be identified. If the seller has maintained records or documents that clearly identify the goods  for which a deposit was paid, the buyer may be entitled to the lien. Where the seller maintains a separate trust account, the buyer can file a property claim for the trust funds which is in priority to other security interests. For examples of the trustee in bankruptcy (of the buyer’s estate) having priority over unpaid sellers, see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2006/2006bcsc1414/2006bcsc1414.html?autocompleteStr=In%20the%20Bankruptcy%20of%20Ian%20Gregory%20Thow%2C%202006%20BCSC%2C%201414&autocompletePos=1 In the Bankruptcy of Ian Gregory Thow'', 2006 BCSC, 1414] and ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2001/2001bcsc1476/2001bcsc1476.html?autocompleteStr=Anderson%27s%20Engineering%20Ltd%202001%20BCSC%201476&autocompletePos=1 In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Anderson's Engineering Ltd.'' 2001 BCSC 1476].   
When a buyer has made a partial or full payment to a seller - and the goods are unascertained or future consumer goods, the buyer can place a lien against all goods that are in, or will come into, the possession of the seller that correspond with the description or sample of goods agreed upon (See Part 9 of the ''Sale of Goods Act'', RSBC 1996, c 410). This holds as long as the goods were not sold to someone else. The buyer also has a lien against any bank account where the seller normally deposits  the  proceeds  of  sales.  This  lien  has  priority  over  all  other  security  interests, but generally is not valid in bankruptcy. Generally, provincial liens will only be recognized in bankruptcy if the specific property can be identified. If the seller has maintained records or documents that clearly identify the goods  for which a deposit was paid, the buyer may be entitled to the lien. Where the seller maintains a separate trust account, the buyer can file a property claim for the trust funds which is in priority to other security interests. For examples of the trustee in bankruptcy (of the buyer’s estate) having priority over unpaid sellers, see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2006/2006bcsc1414/2006bcsc1414.html?autocompleteStr=In%20the%20Bankruptcy%20of%20Ian%20Gregory%20Thow%2C%202006%20BCSC%2C%201414&autocompletePos=1 In the Bankruptcy of Ian Gregory Thow'', 2006 BCSC, 1414] and ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2001/2001bcsc1476/2001bcsc1476.html?autocompleteStr=Anderson%27s%20Engineering%20Ltd%202001%20BCSC%201476&autocompletePos=1 In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Anderson's Engineering Ltd.'' 2001 BCSC 1476].   


The seller can discharge the lien by handing over the good or returning the buyer’s deposit, but the latter will not relieve the seller from the possibility of suit for breach of contract. The buyer’s lien permits the buyer, upon application to court, to have goods seized and sold and have the proceeds delivered, or just have the goods delivered.
The seller can discharge the lien by handing over the good or returning the buyer’s deposit, but the latter will not relieve the seller from the possibility of suit for breach of contract. The buyer’s lien permits the buyer, upon application to court, to have goods seized and sold and have the proceeds delivered, or just have the goods delivered.

Navigation menu