Difference between revisions of "Immigration Law’s Players (18:III)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
m
Line 1: Line 1:
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 16, 2021}}
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= July 4, 2022}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = immigration}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = immigration}}


Line 12: Line 12:
== C. Immigration Representatives, Consultants, and “Shadow” or “Ghost” Consultants ==
== C. Immigration Representatives, Consultants, and “Shadow” or “Ghost” Consultants ==


Under section 91 of the IRPA, the only persons permitted to offer immigration advice or to appear before the Immigration and Refugee Board for consideration (i.e. pay) in relation to an application, are lawyers (and articled students) and members of the Immigration Consultants of  Canada Regulatory Council ("ICCRC"). The ICCRC will be replaced by a new regulatory body, the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants, in the Fall of 2021. A person who is not paid may legally provide assistance and advice to an applicant.   
Under section 91 of the IRPA, the only persons permitted to offer immigration advice or to appear before the Immigration and Refugee Board for consideration (i.e. pay) in relation to an application, are lawyers (and articled students) and members of the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants ("CICC"). A person who is not paid may legally provide assistance and advice to an applicant.   


Any party appearing as a representative to an applicant must complete an IMM5476E "Use of a Representative" form. This includes both unpaid and paid parties.  
Any party appearing as a representative to an applicant must complete an IMM5476E "Use of a Representative" form. This includes both unpaid and paid parties.  


For any proceeding in Federal Court, i.e. judicial review of an IRB decision, '''only lawyers and the applicants themselves may appear'''.  
For any proceeding in Federal Court, such as judicial review of an IRB decision, '''only lawyers and the applicants themselves may appear'''.  


“Shadow” or “ghost” consulting refers to the practice of offering immigration consulting services without the proper accreditation. While these consultants are not authorized players in the immigration process, their presence is nevertheless significant, and often harmful.    Whether acting within Canada or outside Canada, ghost consultants will never appear in the official record of an application, and clinicians will hear only of the advice they gave to the client. Since many immigrants are unaware of the regulatory requirement for authorized representation, those immigrants are exposing themselves to censure and even findings of "misrepresentation" if they employ ghost consultants,  and CIC and CBSA will aggressively pursue such findings if given the opportunity. If a clinician suspects that a ghost consultant was involved in a file, he or she should seek input from a supervisor before revealing this fact to CIC and prejudicing the client. There are methods for pursuing and censuring ghost consultants provided in the IRPA and IRP Regulations, and clients may also have civil remedies against them in certain situations. LSLAP clinicians can assist persons wishing to file complaints or small claims actions against consultants.
“Shadow” or “ghost” consulting refers to the practice of offering immigration consulting services without the proper accreditation. While these consultants are not authorized players in the immigration process, their presence is nevertheless significant, and often harmful.    Whether acting within Canada or outside Canada, ghost consultants will never appear in the official record of an application, and clinicians will hear only of the advice they gave to the client. Since many immigrants are unaware of the regulatory requirement for authorized representation, those immigrants are exposing themselves to censure and even findings of "misrepresentation" if they employ ghost consultants,  and CIC and CBSA will aggressively pursue such findings if given the opportunity. If a clinician suspects that a ghost consultant was involved in a file, he or she should seek input from a supervisor before revealing this fact to CIC and prejudicing the client. There are methods for pursuing and censuring ghost consultants provided in the IRPA and IRP Regulations, and clients may also have civil remedies against them in certain situations. LSLAP clinicians can assist persons wishing to file complaints or small claims actions against consultants.
5,109

edits

Navigation menu