Difference between revisions of "Basic Principles of Spousal Support"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
{{JP Boyd on Family Law TOC|expanded = spousalsupport}}
{{JP Boyd on Family Law TOC|expanded = spousalsupport}}


Spousal support can be payable, or not payable, because of a family law agreement or because of a court order. When support can't be agreed on, married and formerly married spouses can apply for spousal support under the federal ''Divorce Act''. Although both married and unmarried spouses can apply for spousal support under the provincial ''Family Law Act'', there are special rules about how a couple qualify as spouses under that act and special rules about when claims for spousal support can be made.
Spousal support can be payable, or not payable, because of a family law agreement or because of a court order. When support can't be agreed on, married and formerly married spouses can apply for spousal support under the federal ''[[Divorce Act]]''. Although both married and unmarried spouses can apply for spousal support under the provincial ''[[Family Law Act]]'', there are special rules about how a couple qualify as spouses under that act and special rules about when claims for spousal support can be made.


This page provides an introduction to the basic principles of the law on spousal support, and explores how spousal support is awarded under the ''Divorce Act'' and the 'Family Law Act'. It also discusses the basics of calculating the amount of support to be paid when someone is entitled to receive it and looks at the sort of support orders the court can make, including interim and final orders. The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines is the subject of in the next page.
This page provides an introduction to the basic principles of the law on spousal support, and explores how spousal support is awarded under the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' and the ''[Family Law Act]''. It also discusses the basics of calculating the amount of support to be paid when someone is entitled to receive it and looks at the sort of support orders the court can make, including interim and final orders. The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines is the subject of in the next page.


==Introduction==
==Introduction==
Line 18: Line 18:
===The ''Divorce Act''===
===The ''Divorce Act''===


If the claim for spousal support is being made under the federal ''Divorce Act'', the parties must be or have been married, and the person asking for spousal support must have lived in the province in which the court proceeding is started for at least a year before the proceeding is started.
If the claim for spousal support is being made under the federal ''[[Divorce Act]]'', the parties must be or have been married, and the person asking for spousal support must have lived in the province in which the court proceeding is started for at least a year before the proceeding is started.


The objectives that the court will look at in deciding whether a spouse is entitled to spousal support are set out at s. 15.2(6) of the ''Divorce Act''. If a spouse is entitled to spousal support, the factors that the court will review to determine the amount of support and the length of time for which it should be paid are set out in s. 15.2(4). The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines may also be used to help decide how much support should be paid and for how long it should be paid.
The objectives that the court will look at in deciding whether a spouse is entitled to spousal support are set out at s. 15.2(6) of the ''[[Divorce Act]]''. If a spouse is entitled to spousal support, the factors that the court will review to determine the amount of support and the length of time for which it should be paid are set out in s. 15.2(4). The [http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/fcy-fea/spo-epo/g-ld/spag/index.html Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines] may also be used to help decide how much support should be paid and for how long it should be paid.


===The ''Family Law Act''===
===The ''[[Family Law Act]]''===


If the claim is being made under the provincial ''Family Law Act'', spousal support is available for married and unmarried spouses. For unmarried spouses, spousal support may be payable, providing that:
If the claim is being made under the provincial ''[[Family Law Act]]'', spousal support is available for married and unmarried spouses. For unmarried spouses, spousal support may be payable, providing that:


#the parties lived in a "marriage-like relationship" for at least two years; or,
#the parties lived in a "marriage-like relationship" for at least two years, or
#the parties lived in a marriage-like relationship for less than two years and have a child together.
#the parties lived in a marriage-like relationship for less than two years and have a child together.


Married spouses must start a court proceeding claiming spousal support within two years of the date of their ''divorce'' or an order ''annulling'' their marriage. Unmarried spouses must start a court proceeding within two years of the date of their ''separation''. The ''Divorce Act'' doesn't have any rule about when an application for support can be brought following divorce; under that law, a spouse is always a spouse entitled to apply for support.
Married spouses must start a court proceeding claiming spousal support within two years of the date of their ''divorce'' or an order ''annulling'' their marriage. Unmarried spouses must start a court proceeding within two years of the date of their ''separation''. The ''[[Divorce Act]]'' doesn't have any rule about when an application for support can be brought following divorce; under that law, a spouse is always a spouse entitled to apply for support.


The objectives that the court will look at in deciding whether a spouse is entitled to spousal support are set out at s. 161 of the ''Family Law Act''. If a spouse is entitled to spousal support, the factors that the court will review to determine the amount of support and the length of time for which it should be paid are set out in s. 162. The ''Family Law Act'' objectives and factors for spousal support are the same as the ''Divorce Act'' objectives and factors, and the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines may also be used to help decide how much support should be paid and for how long it should be paid.
The objectives that the court will look at in deciding whether a spouse is entitled to spousal support are set out at s. 161 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]''. If a spouse is entitled to spousal support, the factors that the court will review to determine the amount of support and the length of time for which it should be paid are set out in s. 162. The ''[[Family Law Act]]'' objectives and factors for spousal support are the same as the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' objectives and factors, and the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines may also be used to help decide how much support should be paid and for how long it should be paid.


===June and Ward Cleaver: An explanation of spousal support===
===June and Ward Cleaver: An explanation of spousal support===
Line 56: Line 56:
===Spousal support, fault and misconduct===
===Spousal support, fault and misconduct===


Divorce in Canada has been "no-fault" since the ''Divorce Act'' was updated in 1968, and the ''Family Relations Act'' followed suit when it was introduced in 1972. A ''no-fault'' system means that the conduct of the spouses during their relationship and the reasons why their relationship has ended have nothing to do with whether spousal support is payable, how the children wind up being cared for, or how property and debt are divided. Whether someone was abusive or a cheater, for example, is not relevant to the court's consideration of these issues. In fact, s. 15.2(5) of the ''Divorce Act'' says:
Divorce in Canada has been "no-fault" since the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' was updated in 1968, and the ''Family Relations Act'' followed suit when it was introduced in 1972. A ''no-fault'' system means that the conduct of the spouses during their relationship and the reasons why their relationship has ended have nothing to do with whether spousal support is payable, how the children wind up being cared for, or how property and debt are divided. Whether someone was abusive or a cheater, for example, is not relevant to the court's consideration of these issues. In fact, s. 15.2(5) of the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' says:


<blockquote><tt>In making an order [for spousal support] the court shall not take into consideration any misconduct of a spouse in relation to the marriage.</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>In making an order [for spousal support] the court shall not take into consideration any misconduct of a spouse in relation to the marriage.</tt></blockquote>


The Supreme Court of Canada, in a 2006 ''Divorce Act'' case called ''Leskun v. Leskun'', confirmed that the conduct of the spouses must not be taken into consideration in making a decision about whether spousal support should be paid following the end of their marriage.
The Supreme Court of Canada, in a 2006 ''[[Divorce Act]]'' case called ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1nmrd Leskun v. Leskun]'', [2006] 1 SCR 920 confirmed that the conduct of the spouses must not be taken into consideration in making a decision about whether spousal support should be paid following the end of their marriage.


The ''Family Law Act'' takes a slightly different approach. Section 166 says this:
The ''[[Family Law Act]]'' takes a slightly different approach. Section 166 says this:


<blockquote><tt>In making an order respecting spousal support, the court must not consider any misconduct of a spouse, except conduct that arbitrarily or unreasonably</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>In making an order respecting spousal support, the court must not consider any misconduct of a spouse, except conduct that arbitrarily or unreasonably</tt></blockquote>
Line 68: Line 68:
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) affects the ability to provide spousal support.</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) affects the ability to provide spousal support.</tt></blockquote></blockquote>


In other words, like the ''Divorce Act'', the court cannot consider misconduct in relation to the relationship, but the court can look at the parties' behaviour after they separate, and whether the recipient is doing the things that need to be done to become economically self-sufficient or the payor is doing things that undermine his or her ability to pay support.
In other words, like the ''[[Divorce Act]]'', the court cannot consider misconduct in relation to the relationship, but the court can look at the parties' behaviour after they separate, and whether the recipient is doing the things that need to be done to become economically self-sufficient or the payor is doing things that undermine his or her ability to pay support.


===Securing a spousal support obligation===
===Securing a spousal support obligation===


Under s. 170 of the ''Family Law Act'', the court may make a number of additional orders when it is making an order for spousal support which can help to ensure that spousal support continues to be paid, including after the death of the payor. The court may:
Under s. 170 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'', the court may make a number of additional orders when it is making an order for spousal support which can help to ensure that spousal support continues to be paid, including after the death of the payor. The court may:


#order that a charge be registered against property,
#order that a charge be registered against property,
Line 86: Line 86:
===Spousal support when the payor dies===
===Spousal support when the payor dies===


When a payor dies, the recipient can apply to court for an order under s. 171(3)(b) of the ''Family Law Act'' that the payor's support obligation will continue and be paid from his or her estate.
When a payor dies, the recipient can apply to court for an order under s. 171(3)(b) of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' that the payor's support obligation will continue and be paid from his or her estate.


When a recipient applies to continue a support obligation or if a support order says that the obligation will continue past the payor's death, the payor's ''personal representative'', the person managing the payor's estate and will, has the right to defend the recipient's application or to vary or terminate a continuing obligation.
When a recipient applies to continue a support obligation or if a support order says that the obligation will continue past the payor's death, the payor's ''personal representative'', the person managing the payor's estate and will, has the right to defend the recipient's application or to vary or terminate a continuing obligation.
Line 92: Line 92:
==The objectives and factors of spousal support==
==The objectives and factors of spousal support==


Under s. 160 of the ''Family Law Act'', when a spouse applies for spousal support, the court must determine whether he or she is entitled to support by considering the ''objectives'' set out in s. 161. If entitled is found, the court must then determine how much support should be paid and for how long by considering the ''factors'' set out in s. 162.
Under s. 160 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'', when a spouse applies for spousal support, the court must determine whether he or she is entitled to support by considering the ''objectives'' set out in s. 161. If entitled is found, the court must then determine how much support should be paid and for how long by considering the ''factors'' set out in s. 162.


Section 15.2(6) of the ''Divorce Act'' and s. 161 of the ''Family Law Act'' set out the objectives for a spousal support order:
Section 15.2(6) of the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' and s. 161 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' set out the objectives for a spousal support order:


<blockquote><tt>(a) to recognize any economic advantages or disadvantages to the spouses arising from the relationship between the spouses or the breakdown of that relationship;</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>(a) to recognize any economic advantages or disadvantages to the spouses arising from the relationship between the spouses or the breakdown of that relationship;</tt></blockquote>
Line 101: Line 101:
<blockquote><tt>(d) as far as practicable, promote the economic self-sufficiency of each spouse within a reasonable period of time.</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>(d) as far as practicable, promote the economic self-sufficiency of each spouse within a reasonable period of time.</tt></blockquote>


The first three objectives are fairly straightforward and are self-explanatory. The last one deserves some comment however. The effect of s. 15.2(6)(d) and s. 161(d) is to impose almost an obligation on a recipient to make his or her best efforts to become self-sufficient at some point following separation. A spousal relationship is not intended to be a lifelong meal ticket; at some point, a dependent spouse must usually become independent. These sections of the ''Divorce Act'' and the ''Family Law Act'' allow the court to set a date on which spousal support payments will end, in the expectation that by the termination date the recipient will have taken whatever steps are necessary to retrain and find a job which allows him or her to meet his or her daily needs. While termination dates are often subject to change, unless the recipient is of an advanced age, the relationship was extraordinarily long, or the recipient has a serious medical condition or some other factor which prevents him or her from becoming independent, there will likely be an end date to support payments
The first three objectives are fairly straightforward and are self-explanatory. The last one deserves some comment however. The effect of s. 15.2(6)(d) and s. 161(d) is to impose almost an obligation on a recipient to make his or her best efforts to become self-sufficient at some point following separation. A spousal relationship is not intended to be a lifelong meal ticket; at some point, a dependent spouse must usually become independent. These sections of the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' and the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' allow the court to set a date on which spousal support payments will end, in the expectation that by the termination date the recipient will have taken whatever steps are necessary to retrain and find a job which allows him or her to meet his or her daily needs. While termination dates are often subject to change, unless the recipient is of an advanced age, the relationship was extraordinarily long, or the recipient has a serious medical condition or some other factor which prevents him or her from becoming independent, there will likely be an end date to support payments


Section 15.2(4) of the ''Divorce Act'' and s. 162 of the ''Family Law Act'' set out the factors for a spousal support order
Section 15.2(4) of the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' and s. 162 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' set out the factors for a spousal support order


<blockquote><tt>(a) the length of time the spouses cohabited;</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>(a) the length of time the spouses cohabited;</tt></blockquote>
Line 113: Line 113:
===Spousal support and child support===
===Spousal support and child support===


Section 15.3 of the ''Divorce Act'' and s. 173 of the ''Family Law Act'' state that child support must take priority over an order for spousal support. When the payor cannot pay both spousal support and child support, the court is required to make an order for child support at the expense of an order for spousal support. Children come first.
Section 15.3 of the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' and s. 173 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' state that child support must take priority over an order for spousal support. When the payor cannot pay both spousal support and child support, the court is required to make an order for child support at the expense of an order for spousal support. Children come first.


===Statutory provisions===
===Statutory provisions===


These are the primary sections of the ''Divorce Act'' dealing with spousal support.
These are the primary sections of the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' dealing with spousal support.


*s. 2: definitions
*s. 2: definitions
Line 127: Line 127:
*s. 17: varying support orders
*s. 17: varying support orders


These are the primary sections of the ''Family Law Act'' dealing with spousal support.
These are the primary sections of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' dealing with spousal support.


*s. 1: definitions
*s. 1: definitions
Line 142: Line 142:
==Calculating spousal support==
==Calculating spousal support==


It is difficult to predict how much spousal support will be paid in any given case. You can, however, get a rough idea by looking at each spouse's expenses and the disposable income available to each of them, especially the payor. You should also look at the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, which lawyers and the court routinely rely on to determine spousal support payments. These are discussed in the next page, ________ .
It is difficult to predict how much spousal support will be paid in any given case. You can, however, get a rough idea by looking at each spouse's expenses and the disposable income available to each of them, especially the payor. You should also look at the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, which lawyers and the court routinely rely on to determine spousal support payments. These are discussed in the page on [[The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines]].


In order to decide what should be paid, assuming of course that the recipient is entitled to receive support, it is critical that each party prepare a sworn Financial Statement where a court proceeding has started or not. A Financial Statement is a court form used in both the Supreme Court and the Provincial Court that sets out each party's income and assets, expenses and liabilities. Exchanging sworn Financial Statements is an excellent starting point for figuring out the amount of support which ought to be paid.
In order to decide what should be paid, assuming of course that the recipient is entitled to receive support, it is critical that each party prepare a sworn Financial Statement where a court proceeding has started or not. A Financial Statement is a court form used in both the Supreme Court and the Provincial Court that sets out each party's income and assets, expenses and liabilities. Exchanging sworn Financial Statements is an excellent starting point for figuring out the amount of support which ought to be paid.
Line 155: Line 155:
*Fourth, compare the recipient's monthly needs to the payor's disposable income. If the recipient's needs can be met from the payor's disposable income, a support order will likely be made in that amount. If the recipient's needs can't be met from the payor's disposable income, go back to step one and be more conservative with both parties' expenses.
*Fourth, compare the recipient's monthly needs to the payor's disposable income. If the recipient's needs can be met from the payor's disposable income, a support order will likely be made in that amount. If the recipient's needs can't be met from the payor's disposable income, go back to step one and be more conservative with both parties' expenses.


The payor's monthly disposable income is an obvious place to begin talking about how much spousal support he or she can afford to pay. However, if there is a shortfall between the payor's diposable income and the recipient's need, someone needs to trim some expenses somewhere. Ultimately, if a compromise can't be reached, one of the parties may have to accumulate some debt over the short term. This will usually be the party better able to shoulder the financial burden... usually the payor.
The payor's monthly disposable income is an obvious place to begin talking about how much spousal support he or she can afford to pay. However, if there is a shortfall between the payor's disposable income and the recipient's need, someone needs to trim some expenses somewhere. Ultimately, if a compromise can't be reached, one of the parties may have to accumulate some debt over the short term. This will usually be the party better able to shoulder the financial burden... usually the payor.


The court will not bankrupt a payor in order to meet the dependant spouse's needs. Obviously, there must be a balancing. In many cases this means that both parties must adjust their standard of living to be able to live within the pool of income available to them.
The court will not bankrupt a payor in order to meet the dependant spouse's needs. Obviously, there must be a balancing. In many cases this means that both parties must adjust their standard of living to be able to live within the pool of income available to them.
Line 173: Line 173:
===Calculating spousal support with the Advisory Guidelines===
===Calculating spousal support with the Advisory Guidelines===


Assuming that the Advisory Guidelines will be used, you can visit DivorceMate's website, mysupportcalculator.ca, to use their free spousal support calculator. This calculator is very good for simple situations, but if there is anything complicated about your circumstances you may want to meet with a lawyer who has bought DivorceMate's expensive commercial software. The lawyer should be able to give you some fairly fine-tuned numbers.
Assuming that the Advisory Guidelines will be used, you can visit DivorceMate's website for their free spousal support calculator, http://mysupportcalculator.ca. This calculator is very good for simple situations, but if there is anything complicated about your circumstances you may want to meet with a lawyer who has bought DivorceMate's expensive commercial software. The lawyer should be able to give you some fairly fine-tuned numbers.


The next page, ________ , discusses the Advisory Guidelines formulas in a lot more detail.
The page on [[The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines]] discusses the Advisory Guidelines formulas in a lot more detail.


==Orders and agreements on spousal support==
==Orders and agreements on spousal support==
Line 187: Line 187:
The court will think about the same things when it hears an application for an interim spousal support order as it does at the hearing for a final order. At least, that's the general rule. In reality, however, the court usually takes a pretty rough and ready approach to interim applications based on something called the ''means and needs'' test.
The court will think about the same things when it hears an application for an interim spousal support order as it does at the hearing for a final order. At least, that's the general rule. In reality, however, the court usually takes a pretty rough and ready approach to interim applications based on something called the ''means and needs'' test.


*Does the person making the application, the ''Applicant'', have a need for support?
*Does the person making the application, the ''applicant'', have a need for support?
*Does the other person, the ''Respondent'', have the means to pay it?
*Does the other person, the ''respondent'', have the means to pay it?


The court will not usually attempt to determine whether the Applicant's need is related to the relationship or its breakdown in making an interim order for spousal support. In a case called ''L.C.M. v. M.A.C.M.'', a 2005 decision of our Supreme Court, the judge said that interim spousal support should only be awarded where an obvious case for entitlement is made out.
The court will not usually attempt to determine whether the applicant's need is related to the relationship or its breakdown in making an interim order for spousal support. In a case called ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1mtw3 L.C.M. v. M.A.C.M.]'', 2005 BCSC 1786 a 2005 decision of our Supreme Court, the judge said that interim spousal support should only be awarded where an obvious case for entitlement is made out.


Spousal support will often be awarded on an interim basis where:
Spousal support will often be awarded on an interim basis where:


#there are young children who need a stay-at-home caregiver,
#there are young children who need a stay-at-home caregiver,
#the Applicant is unemployed at the time of the application and hasn't worked outside the home for a number of years,
#the applicant is unemployed at the time of the application and hasn't worked outside the home for a number of years,
#the Applicant is unemployed and faces barriers to employment, such as a lack of training or poor language skills, or
#the applicant is unemployed and faces barriers to employment, such as a lack of training or poor language skills, or
#the Applicant is employed but is unable to pay his or her household bills without help.
#the applicant is employed but is unable to pay his or her household bills without help.


Of course, ''need'' alone isn't enough and the person against whom the application is brought must have the ability to actually ''pay'' support. Whether the payor has the means to pay support is usually figured out by looking at the payor's monthly income, less any child support obligations, less his or her reasonable monthly expenses. If there is money left over, if there is ''disposable income'', some or all of that money is available to be paid as spousal support.
Of course, ''need'' alone isn't enough and the person against whom the application is brought must have the ability to actually ''pay'' support. Whether the payor has the means to pay support is usually figured out by looking at the payor's monthly income, less any child support obligations, less his or her reasonable monthly expenses. If there is money left over, if there is ''disposable income'', some or all of that money is available to be paid as spousal support.
Line 205: Line 205:
===Final orders and agreements: periodic payments===
===Final orders and agreements: periodic payments===


Under the ''Divorce Act ''and the ''Family Law Act'', a court may make an order for spousal support for regular payments, called ''periodic payments'', to run for a fixed period of time (a ''definite'' term), or to run without a particular end date (an ''indefinite'' term). Whether an order requires that spousal support be paid for a definite or indefinite term will depend on the particular circumstances of each case. In general, however, the longer the relationship was and the older the parties are, the more likely it is that the court will be to make an indefinite order for spousal support.
Under the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' and the ''[[Family Law Act]]'', a court may make an order for spousal support for regular payments, called ''periodic payments'', to run for a fixed period of time (a ''definite'' term), or to run without a particular end date (an ''indefinite'' term). Whether an order requires that spousal support be paid for a definite or indefinite term will depend on the particular circumstances of each case. In general, however, the longer the relationship was and the older the parties are, the more likely it is that the court will be to make an indefinite order for spousal support.


====Indefinite obligations====
====Indefinite obligations====
Line 227: Line 227:
====Reviewable orders and agreements====
====Reviewable orders and agreements====


Under s. 168 of the ''Family Law Act'', an order or agreement which requires the payment of spousal support can be ''reviewable''. A reviewable order or agreement for spousal support is one which says that spousal support must be paid indefinitely but that the payor's obligation to pay support or the recipient's entitlement to receive it will be reviewed at a later date, called a ''review date''. A review date may be a particular day, usually not sooner than two years after the date of the agreement or order, or it may be triggered by a particular event such as:
Under s. 168 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'', an order or agreement which requires the payment of spousal support can be ''reviewable''. A reviewable order or agreement for spousal support is one which says that spousal support must be paid indefinitely but that the payor's obligation to pay support or the recipient's entitlement to receive it will be reviewed at a later date, called a ''review date''. A review date may be a particular day, usually not sooner than two years after the date of the agreement or order, or it may be triggered by a particular event such as:


#the children leaving home,
#the children leaving home,
Line 258: Line 258:
#the amount of the recipient's income, if employed,
#the amount of the recipient's income, if employed,
#the payor's retirement date,
#the payor's retirement date,
#the recipient's anticipated length of recovery from an illness,
#the recipient's anticipated length of recovery from an illness, or
#the age at which the children will enter school or the age at which they can enter daycare.
#the age at which the children will enter school or the age at which they can enter daycare.


Line 282: Line 282:


Lump sum awards are available on interim applications, but such awards are unusual. A lump sum payment may be ordered if it is clear that: the payment will provide immediate relief for the recipient; ongoing monthly payments will not be necessary, the payor has the ability to make the payment.
Lump sum awards are available on interim applications, but such awards are unusual. A lump sum payment may be ordered if it is clear that: the payment will provide immediate relief for the recipient; ongoing monthly payments will not be necessary, the payor has the ability to make the payment.
 
<!---HIDDEN
==Further Reading in this Chapter==
==Further Reading in this Chapter==


* <span style="color: red;">bulleted list of other pages in this chapter, linked</span>
* <span style="color: red;">bulleted list of other pages in this chapter, linked</span>
 
END HIDDEN--->
==Page resources and links==
==Page resources and links==


===Legislation===
===Legislation===


* <span style="color: red;">bulleted list of linked legislation referred to in page</span>
* ''[[Family Law Act]]''
FLA, DA
* ''[[Divorce Act]]''
* [http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/fcy-fea/spo-epo/g-ld/spag/index.html Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines] ''(not technically a piece of legislation)''


===Links===
===Links===


* <span style="color: red;">bulleted list of linked external websites referred to in page</span>
* [http://mysupportcalculator.ca Free Basic Spousal Support Calculator from Divorcemate]
* list of related public resources
* [http://childview.ca/ ChildView, Spousal Support Calculator Software Company
public spousal support calculator, websites of DivorceMate and ChildView




{{JP Boyd on Family Law Navbox|type=chapters}}
{{JP Boyd on Family Law Navbox|type=chapters}}

Navigation menu