Difference between revisions of "The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
m
m
Line 9: Line 9:
When someone is entitled to receive spousal support, the Advisory Guidelines describes several different formulas that can be used to calculate how much support should be paid and the length of time it should be paid for. While no one is required to use the Advisory Guidelines, lawyers and the courts routinely use them in making decisions about spousal support.
When someone is entitled to receive spousal support, the Advisory Guidelines describes several different formulas that can be used to calculate how much support should be paid and the length of time it should be paid for. While no one is required to use the Advisory Guidelines, lawyers and the courts routinely use them in making decisions about spousal support.


This section provides an introduction to the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines. It discusses what the courts have had to say about the Advisory Guidelines and describes its formulas, reststucting the formulas' results, and the exceptions to the formulas.
This section provides an introduction to the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines. It discusses what the courts have had to say about the Advisory Guidelines and describes how its formulas work, how they can be restructured for fairness, and what exceptions exist to the formulas.


==An introduction to the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines==
==An introduction to the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines==
Line 95: Line 95:
The law in British Columbia, then, is that the results of the Advisory Guidelines calculations must be considered when making a decision on spousal support. The Advisory Guidelines is, in other words, all but mandatory in this province.
The law in British Columbia, then, is that the results of the Advisory Guidelines calculations must be considered when making a decision on spousal support. The Advisory Guidelines is, in other words, all but mandatory in this province.


(Of course, this also means that lawyers must become proficient in using the Advisory Guidelines formulas or they risk giving their clients and the courts incorrect information. The Without Child Support calculations, discussed later, are not terribly complex, but the With Child Support calculations demand a basic knowledge of the federal and provincial benefits and credits relating to children, the different deductions that apply to employment and self-employment income, received versus taxable dividends, and a few other wrinkles relating to the calculation of after-tax income. Owning the software required to do the Advisory Guidelines calculations isn't enough. Lawyers need to know how to expertly use that software, with tax and income issues in mind, and the software has to do the math and actually perform those calculations correctly. See my paper on the subject, posted on the Department of Justice's website.)
(Of course, this also means that lawyers must become proficient in using the Advisory Guidelines formulas or they risk giving their clients and the courts incorrect information. The Without Child Support calculations, discussed later, are not terribly complex, but the With Child Support calculations demand a basic knowledge of the federal and provincial benefits and credits relating to children, the different deductions that apply to employment and self-employment income, received versus taxable dividends, and a few other wrinkles relating to the calculation of after-tax income. Owning the software required to do the Advisory Guidelines calculations isn't enough. Lawyers need to know how to expertly use that software, with tax and income issues in mind, and the software has to do the math and actually perform those calculations correctly.)


===The law in other provinces===
===The law in other provinces===


Many courts in Canada's other provinces and territories have talked about the Advisory Guidelines in much the same way as our courts have, although with varying degrees of enthusiasm. Alberta has led the charge against the Advisory Guidelines and is the province in which it least likely to be used to determine a spousal support obligation.
Many courts in Canada's other provinces and territories have talked about the Advisory Guidelines in much the same way as our courts have, although with varying degrees of enthusiasm. Alberta has led the charge against the Advisory Guidelines and is the province in which it is least likely to be used to determine a spousal support obligation.


Here is a sampling of judicial comment on the Advisory Guidelines.
Here is a sampling of judicial comment on the Advisory Guidelines.
Line 130: Line 130:
==The forumlas==
==The forumlas==


The Advisory Guidelines describes two basic formulas: one for when child support is not being paid (the ''Without Child Support Formula''), as might be the case if the couple have no children or if all of the children are adults and financially independent at the time of separation; and, one for when there is a legal obligation to pay child support (the ''With Child Support Formula''), whether child support is actually being paid or not. The main With Child Support Formula is designed for situations where the person receiving spousal support is also the person receiving child support. Since this isn't always the case and the amount of child support that's being paid isn't always the amount required by the Child Support Guidelines, the Advisory Guidelines has a few variations of the With Child Support Formula which will apply:
The Advisory Guidelines describes two basic formulas: one for when child support is not being paid (the ''Without Child Support Formula''), as might be the case if the couple have no children or if all of the children are adults and financially independent at the time of separation; and, one for when there is a legal obligation to pay child support (the ''With Child Support Formula''), whether child support is actually being paid or not.  
 
The main With Child Support Formula is designed for situations where the person receiving spousal support is also the person receiving child support. Since this isn't always the case and the amount of child support that's being paid isn't always the amount required by the Child Support Guidelines, the Advisory Guidelines has a few variations of the With Child Support Formula that will apply:


*when custody of the children is shared (when the parents have the children for an equal or near-equal amount of time),
*when custody of the children is shared (when the parents have the children for an equal or near-equal amount of time),
Line 175: Line 177:
<blockquote><blockquote>2) the length of time remaining until the youngest child finishes full-time school</blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote>2) the length of time remaining until the youngest child finishes full-time school</blockquote></blockquote>


I told you it was complex. To quote Professor Thompson, "this is not a calculation you can do on the back of an envelope, you will need a computer program." This formula requires a detailed understanding of how income is determined under the Advisory Guidelines and of the various government benefits, tax deductions and tax credits that can apply to adjust net income. I've written a paper on the subject for the Department of Justice, "[http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/fcy-fea/spo-epo/calc/pdf/orrssagc.pdf Obtaining Reliable and Repeatable SSAG Calculations]," which is available to the public. Be warned: it's a bit dry.
I told you it was complex. To quote Professor Thompson, "this is not a calculation you can do on the back of an envelope, you will need a computer program." This formula requires a detailed understanding of how income is determined under the Advisory Guidelines and of the various government benefits, tax deductions and tax credits that can apply to adjust net income.  
 
I've written a paper on the subject for the Department of Justice, "[http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/fcy-fea/spo-epo/calc/pdf/orrssagc.pdf Obtaining Reliable and Repeatable SSAG Calculations]," which is available to the public. Be warned: it's a bit dry.


The maximum amount payable under this formula is the range the formula sets out: 40% to 46% of the difference between the payor's net disposable income and the recipient's net disposable income.
The maximum amount payable under this formula is the range the formula sets out: 40% to 46% of the difference between the payor's net disposable income and the recipient's net disposable income.
Line 210: Line 214:
#pay more spousal support each month, but for a shorter period of time,
#pay more spousal support each month, but for a shorter period of time,
#pay less each month, but pay for a longer period of time, or
#pay less each month, but pay for a longer period of time, or
#pay the total amount payable over the period of the award in a single lump-sum.
#pay the total amount payable over the period of the award in a single lump sum.


The point of each option is that the total amount payable under the formula results stays the same. The total amount is just paid sooner or later than the results for duration would normally require.
The point of each option is that the total amount payable under the formula results stays the same. The total amount is just paid sooner or later than the results for duration would normally require.
Line 246: Line 250:
===Other exceptions===
===Other exceptions===


The Advisory Guidelines allows still other exceptions from the formulas to address situations where a child has special needs which result in the parents having greater expenses than other parents, where a relationship was very short but resulted in significant economic loss to the recipient, like the loss of a career opportunity or an expensive move, where payment of support within the ranges for amount is not sufficient to meet the recipient's needs, and where the payor's income is not taxed.
The Advisory Guidelines allows still other exceptions from the formulas to address situations where a child has special needs which result in the parents having greater expenses than other parents; where a relationship was very short but resulted in significant economic loss to the recipient like the loss of a career opportunity or an expensive move; where payment of support within the ranges for amount is not sufficient to meet the recipient's needs; and, where the payor's income is not taxed.


If you think your situation falls into one of these exceptions, or one of the exceptions discussed above, you should seriously consider hiring a lawyer for advice about your situation and how the Advisory Guidelines may apply.
If you think your situation falls into one of these exceptions, or one of the exceptions discussed above, you should seriously consider hiring a lawyer for advice about your situation and how the Advisory Guidelines may apply.
Line 254: Line 258:
* <span style="color: red;">bulleted list of other pages in this chapter, linked</span>
* <span style="color: red;">bulleted list of other pages in this chapter, linked</span>
END HIDDEN--->
END HIDDEN--->
==Page resources, documents and links==
==Resources and links==


===Legislation===
===Legislation===
2,443

edits

Navigation menu