7,366
edits
Difference between revisions of "Clicklaw Wikibooks Cheatsheet"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) |
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
::second indent | ::second indent | ||
:::third indent | :::third indent | ||
|-<!--EXAMPLES--> | |||
| colspan="3" style="background:#FFCC66; padding: 0.2em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;" | '''Examples''' | |||
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS--> | |||
| width="30%" style="background:#FFCC66; padding:0.3em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;"|Description | |||
| style="background:#FFCC66; padding:0.3em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;"|You type | |||
| width="30%" style="background:#FFCC66; padding:0.3em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;"|You get | |||
|-<!--1ST ROW 1ST COLUMN--> | |||
|Case reference<br/>''For linking and providing the proper citation of a case law, see [[Clicklaw Wikibooks Style Guide#References | Style Guide]]. | |||
|<!--2ND COLUMN--> | |||
<tt><nowiki>The Court of Appeal went even further in ''[http://canlii.ca/t/2d35m Domirti v. Domirti]'', 2010 BCCA 472, ruling that an award falling substantially outside the Advisory Guidelines may be an appealable error.</nowiki></tt> | |||
|<!--3RD COLUMN--> | |||
The Court of Appeal went even further in ''[http://canlii.ca/t/2d35m Domirti v. Domirti]'', 2010 BCCA 472, ruling that an award falling substantially outside the Advisory Guidelines may be an appealable error. | |||
|-<!--HORIZONTAL LINE--> | |||
|colspan="3" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|} | |} | ||
{{Template:Navbox for Clicklaw Wikibooks Guide|type=additional}} | {{Template:Navbox for Clicklaw Wikibooks Guide|type=additional}} | ||
[[Category:Clicklaw Wikibooks Guides]] | [[Category:Clicklaw Wikibooks Guides]] | ||