Difference between revisions of "Clicklaw Wikibooks Cheatsheet"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 116: Line 116:
|Case reference<br/>''For linking and providing the proper citation of a case law, see [[Clicklaw Wikibooks Style Guide#References | Style Guide]].
|Case reference<br/>''For linking and providing the proper citation of a case law, see [[Clicklaw Wikibooks Style Guide#References | Style Guide]].
|<!--2ND COLUMN-->
|<!--2ND COLUMN-->
<tt><nowiki>The Court of Appeal went even further in ''[http://canlii.ca/t/2d35m Domirti v. Domirti]'', 2010 BCCA 472, ruling that an award falling substantially outside the Advisory Guidelines may be an appealable error.</nowiki></tt>
<tt><nowiki>In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/2d35m Domirti v. Domirti]'', 2010 BCCA 472, the Court of Appeal ruled that a spousal support award outside the Advisory Guidelines could be an appealable error.</nowiki></tt>
|<!--3RD COLUMN-->
|<!--3RD COLUMN-->
The Court of Appeal went even further in ''[http://canlii.ca/t/2d35m Domirti v. Domirti]'', 2010 BCCA 472, ruling that an award falling substantially outside the Advisory Guidelines may be an appealable error.
In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/2d35m Domirti v. Domirti]'', 2010 BCCA 472, the Court of Appeal ruled that a spousal support award outside the Advisory Guidelines could be an appealable error.
|-<!--HORIZONTAL LINE-->
|-<!--HORIZONTAL LINE-->
|colspan="3" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"|
|colspan="3" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"|

Navigation menu