7,366
edits
Difference between revisions of "Changing Family Law Agreements"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Changing Family Law Agreements (view source)
Revision as of 19:39, 31 March 2013
, 19:39, 31 March 2013no edit summary
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) |
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{JP Boyd on Family Law TOC|expanded = agreements}} | {{JP Boyd on Family Law TOC|expanded = agreements}} | ||
After a family law agreement has been signed, three things can happen: | After a family law agreement has been signed, three things can happen: | ||
#the parties can follow the agreement and everything continues as it should, | |||
#the circumstances of the parties or a child change and their agreement must also change, or | |||
#one of the parties refuses to follow the agreement and it must be enforced by the courts. | |||
==Changing | This page focuses on separation agreements and talks how agreements can be changed without going to court and when the agreements can be set aside by the court. You can learn about how family law agreements are enforced in the page on [[Enforcing Family Law Agreements]]. | ||
==Changing agreements by agreement== | |||
There are always two ways of doing something, the hard way or the easy way. In family law, the easy way usually involves discussion and negotiation. The hard way usually involves a court proceeding, and is generally a fair bit more expensive and time-consuming than the easy way. | There are always two ways of doing something, the hard way or the easy way. In family law, the easy way usually involves discussion and negotiation. The hard way usually involves a court proceeding, and is generally a fair bit more expensive and time-consuming than the easy way. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
Any family law agreement can be changed at any time, as long as the parties to the agreement agree to the change. If the parties can't agree on the change or on the terms of the change, the party who wants the change may have to go to court if the problem is important enough. Since the court doesn't have the power to vary an agreement, the best the court can do is to cancel the party of the order that has to change and then make an order in place of the part that was cancelled. | Any family law agreement can be changed at any time, as long as the parties to the agreement agree to the change. If the parties can't agree on the change or on the terms of the change, the party who wants the change may have to go to court if the problem is important enough. Since the court doesn't have the power to vary an agreement, the best the court can do is to cancel the party of the order that has to change and then make an order in place of the part that was cancelled. | ||
===Amending an | ===Amending an agreement=== | ||
A family law agreement can be changed by a later agreement. If the parties to an agreement both agree that the original agreement should be changed and on how it should be changed, the parties can sign a second agreement called an ''amendment agreement'', an ''amending agreement'' or an ''addendum agreement'' to the original agreement. | A family law agreement can be changed by a later agreement. If the parties to an agreement both agree that the original agreement should be changed and on how it should be changed, the parties can sign a second agreement called an ''amendment agreement'', an ''amending agreement'' or an ''addendum agreement'' to the original agreement. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 28: | ||
Just like the original agreement, the amending agreement must be signed by both parties in the presence of a witness, who watches each party sign the agreement and then signs the agreement him- or herself. | Just like the original agreement, the amending agreement must be signed by both parties in the presence of a witness, who watches each party sign the agreement and then signs the agreement him- or herself. | ||
===Amending an | ===Amending an agreement through negotiation=== | ||
A well-written agreement will usually provide a way for the parties to resolve disputes arising from the agreement. Sometimes this mechanism requires that the parties go to court; sometimes this mechanism prescribes some other means of dispute resolution like mediation or arbitration. | A well-written agreement will usually provide a way for the parties to resolve disputes arising from the agreement. Sometimes this mechanism requires that the parties go to court; sometimes this mechanism prescribes some other means of dispute resolution like mediation or arbitration. | ||
| Line 34: | Line 38: | ||
Whatever method is chosen, it's always better for people to reach a resolution of the problem themselves without having to go to court. This way the power remains in the hands of the people whose lives are affected by the agreement and who must live with it on a daily basis, rather than in the hands of someone else, a judge, who may make a decision that no one is entirely happy with. | Whatever method is chosen, it's always better for people to reach a resolution of the problem themselves without having to go to court. This way the power remains in the hands of the people whose lives are affected by the agreement and who must live with it on a daily basis, rather than in the hands of someone else, a judge, who may make a decision that no one is entirely happy with. | ||
See the chapter | See the chapter [[Resolving Family Law Problems out of Court]] for more information on [[Family Law Mediation]] and [[Family Law Arbitration]]. | ||
==Intervention by the | ==Intervention by the courts== | ||
If a party to an agreement becomes unhappy with an agreement, there are two ways to proceed. First, the party could ask the court to throw out the entire agreement because it is unfair, because the agreement is invalid or because of some other fatal problem with the contract. Second, the party could apply under the ''Family Law Act'' to set aside just part of the agreement. | If a party to an agreement becomes unhappy with an agreement, there are two ways to proceed. First, the party could ask the court to throw out the entire agreement because it is unfair, because the agreement is invalid or because of some other fatal problem with the contract. Second, the party could apply under the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' to set aside just part of the agreement. | ||
In general, the court will be reluctant to meddle with a reasonable separation agreement. In fact, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia has said that separation agreements should be treated by the courts with "great deference." This is because a separation agreement is a private contract between two parties which is the product of an often lengthy process of negotiation, and the courts are usually unwilling to disturb an agreement without a very good reason for doing so. The courts will be similarly reluctant to change a final order that was the product of a separation agreement. | In general, the court will be reluctant to meddle with a reasonable separation agreement. In fact, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia has said that separation agreements should be treated by the courts with "great deference." This is because a separation agreement is a private contract between two parties which is the product of an often lengthy process of negotiation, and the courts are usually unwilling to disturb an agreement without a very good reason for doing so. The courts will be similarly reluctant to change a final order that was the product of a separation agreement. | ||
===Setting | ===Setting aside agreements under the law of contracts=== | ||
Just like a commercial contract, the validity of a family law agreement can be challenged for a number of reasons based on the common law of contracts: | Just like a commercial contract, the validity of a family law agreement can be challenged for a number of reasons based on the common law of contracts: | ||
#the agreement was ''not freely signed'', in other words, a party was under duress when the agreement was negotiated or executed | #the agreement was ''not freely signed'', in other words, a party was under duress when the agreement was negotiated or executed, | ||
#the agreement is ''unconscionable'', in other words, the agreement is obviously and seriously unfair to a party | #the agreement is ''unconscionable'', in other words, the agreement is obviously and seriously unfair to a party, | ||
#a party signed the agreement without independent legal advice, did not fully understand what the agreement meant and signed it by ''mistake'' | #a party signed the agreement without independent legal advice, did not fully understand what the agreement meant and signed it by ''mistake'', | ||
#the agreement was signed without ''full disclosure'' having been made | #the agreement was signed without ''full disclosure'' having been made, or | ||
#a party signed the agreement because ''misleading information'' had been provided. | #a party signed the agreement because ''misleading information'' had been provided. | ||
====Duress, | ====Duress, coercion, unconscionability and mistake==== | ||
The courts won't enforce an agreement — that is, they won't compel the parties to abide by an agreement — where one of the parties was forced or pressured to enter into the agreement. An agreement must be entered into freely and voluntarily. | The courts won't enforce an agreement — that is, they won't compel the parties to abide by an agreement — where one of the parties was forced or pressured to enter into the agreement. An agreement must be entered into freely and voluntarily. | ||
| Line 60: | Line 64: | ||
Agreements that are hugely unfair can also be found to be unconscionable, as can agreements formed under a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of the family finances or one party's assets. | Agreements that are hugely unfair can also be found to be unconscionable, as can agreements formed under a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of the family finances or one party's assets. | ||
====Lack of | ====Lack of independent legal advice==== | ||
A spouse may be able to challenge the validity of an agreement where he or she did not receive independent legal advice before executing the agreement. Independent legal advice helps to ensure that both parties are on a more or less equal footing going into the agreement, and to ensure that one party doesn't unintentionally enter into an unfair agreement. | A spouse may be able to challenge the validity of an agreement where he or she did not receive independent legal advice before executing the agreement. Independent legal advice helps to ensure that both parties are on a more or less equal footing going into the agreement, and to ensure that one party doesn't unintentionally enter into an unfair agreement. | ||
| Line 66: | Line 70: | ||
There is, however, no requirement that independent legal advice be sought before an agreement is executed. In most situations, the absence of independent legal advice alone will not be enough to overturn an agreement by itself. | There is, however, no requirement that independent legal advice be sought before an agreement is executed. In most situations, the absence of independent legal advice alone will not be enough to overturn an agreement by itself. | ||
====Fraud and the | ====Fraud and the failure to make full disclosure==== | ||
When people enter into an agreement, they do so on the assumption that certain material facts are true, that each is earning as much money as they say they are, that each has no more assets than they say they have, and so forth. These assumptions are the foundation on which the agreement is built. If one of the parties has failed to make full disclosure of these sorts of material facts, or if one party has lied about or misrepresented these facts, the courts may be willing to overturn an agreement. | When people enter into an agreement, they do so on the assumption that certain material facts are true, that each is earning as much money as they say they are, that each has no more assets than they say they have, and so forth. These assumptions are the foundation on which the agreement is built. If one of the parties has failed to make full disclosure of these sorts of material facts, or if one party has lied about or misrepresented these facts, the courts may be willing to overturn an agreement. | ||
===Setting | ===Setting aside agreements under the ''Family Law Act''=== | ||
Under the provincial ''Family Law Act'', the court cannot vary or amend a valid agreement. When the court is convinced that an agreement must change, the court will set aside the parts of the agreement that are causing the problem and make an order in place of the parts set aside. Section 214 of the act says this: | Under the provincial ''[[Family Law Act]]'', the court cannot vary or amend a valid agreement. When the court is convinced that an agreement must change, the court will set aside the parts of the agreement that are causing the problem and make an order in place of the parts set aside. Section 214 of the act says this: | ||
<blockquote><tt>(1) If an order is made to set aside part of an agreement, the part is deemed to be severed from the remainder of the agreement.</tt></blockquote> | <blockquote><tt>(1) If an order is made to set aside part of an agreement, the part is deemed to be severed from the remainder of the agreement.</tt></blockquote> | ||
| Line 90: | Line 94: | ||
Under s. 37(1), when the court is making an order about guardianship, it must do so considering only the best interests of the child. The factors the court must think about to decide what is in the best interests of a child are listed at s. 37(2) of the act, and, when family violence is a factor, also at s. 38. | Under s. 37(1), when the court is making an order about guardianship, it must do so considering only the best interests of the child. The factors the court must think about to decide what is in the best interests of a child are listed at s. 37(2) of the act, and, when family violence is a factor, also at s. 38. | ||
====Parental | ====Parental responsibilities, parenting time and contact==== | ||
Under s. 44(4) of the ''Family Law Act'' says this about agreements for parental responsibilities and parenting time: | Under [http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section44 s. 44(4)] of the ''Family Law Act'' says this about agreements for parental responsibilities and parenting time: | ||
<blockquote><tt>On application by a party, the court must set aside or replace with an order made under this Division all or part of an agreement respecting parenting arrangements if satisfied that the agreement is not in the best interests of the child.</tt></blockquote> | <blockquote><tt>On application by a party, the court must set aside or replace with an order made under this Division all or part of an agreement respecting parenting arrangements if satisfied that the agreement is not in the best interests of the child.</tt></blockquote> | ||
Section 58(4) says almost exactly the same about agreements for contact. | Section [http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section58 58(4)] says almost exactly the same about agreements for contact. | ||
The factors the court must think about to decide what is in the best interests of a child are listed at s. 37(2) of the act, and, when family violence is an issue, also the factors listed at s. 38. | The factors the court must think about to decide what is in the best interests of a child are listed at [http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section37 s. 37(2)] of the act, and, when family violence is an issue, also the factors listed at [http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section38 s. 38]. | ||
====Child | ====Child support==== | ||
As in all matters concerning children, the courts' only concern is the best interests of the child. The courts will rarely interfere with an agreement that provides for child support in accordance with the federal Child Support Guidelines. The courts will also be reluctant to reduce a child support provision which is higher than what the Guidelines require, because it is logically in the best interests of the child to have the benefit of as much support as possible. The courts will much more inclined to interfere with a provision of an agreement that calls for a lesser amount of support than what the Guidelines require. | As in all matters concerning children, the courts' only concern is the best interests of the child. The courts will rarely interfere with an agreement that provides for child support in accordance with the federal [[Child Support Guidelines]]. The courts will also be reluctant to reduce a child support provision which is higher than what the Guidelines require, because it is logically in the best interests of the child to have the benefit of as much support as possible. The courts will much more inclined to interfere with a provision of an agreement that calls for a lesser amount of support than what the Guidelines require. | ||
Section 148(3) of the ''Family Law Act'' says this: | [http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section148 Section 148(3)] of the ''Family Law Act'' says this: | ||
<blockquote><tt>On application by a party, the court may set aside or replace with an order made under this Division all or part of an agreement respecting child support if the court would make a different order on consideration of the matters set out in section 150.</tt></blockquote> | <blockquote><tt>On application by a party, the court may set aside or replace with an order made under this Division all or part of an agreement respecting child support if the court would make a different order on consideration of the matters set out in section 150.</tt></blockquote> | ||
Section 150 is the section that says how child support is to be calculated, namely that it is to be calculated according to the Guidelines. As a result, the court will set aside the part of an agreement dealing with child support if: | [http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section150 Section 150] is the section that says how child support is to be calculated, namely that it is to be calculated according to the Guidelines. As a result, the court will set aside the part of an agreement dealing with child support if: | ||
#the payor's income has increased | #the payor's income has increased, | ||
#the payor's income has decreased | #the payor's income has decreased, | ||
#one or more children are no longer living mostly with the parent receiving support | #one or more children are no longer living mostly with the parent receiving support, | ||
#one or more children are now splitting their time almost equally between the homes of the payor and the recipient | #one or more children are now splitting their time almost equally between the homes of the payor and the recipient, | ||
#one or more children are no longer entitled to receive support | #one or more children are no longer entitled to receive support, or | ||
#the agreement otherwise provides for an inadequate amount of child support. | #the agreement otherwise provides for an inadequate amount of child support. | ||
====Spousal Support==== | ====Spousal Support==== | ||
Section 164 of the ''Family Law Act'' talks about when the parts of an agreement about spousal support should be set aside. Under s. 163(2), an agreement about spousal support includes an agreement that spousal support ''won't'' be paid as well as an agreement that spousal support ''will'' be paid. | [http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section164 Section 164] of the ''Family Law Act'' talks about when the parts of an agreement about spousal support should be set aside. Under [http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section163 s. 163(2)], an agreement about spousal support includes an agreement that spousal support ''won't'' be paid as well as an agreement that spousal support ''will'' be paid. | ||
Section 164 provides two legal tests to help the court decide whether an agreement should be set aside. The first test requires the court to look at what happened when the agreement was being negotiated and signed: | [[http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section164 Section 164] provides two legal tests to help the court decide whether an agreement should be set aside. The first test requires the court to look at what happened when the agreement was being negotiated and signed: | ||
<blockquote><tt>(3) On application by a spouse, the court may set aside or replace with an order made under this Division all or part of an agreement described in subsection (1) only if satisfied that one or more of the following circumstances existed when the parties entered into the agreement:</tt></blockquote> | <blockquote><tt>(3) On application by a spouse, the court may set aside or replace with an order made under this Division all or part of an agreement described in subsection (1) only if satisfied that one or more of the following circumstances existed when the parties entered into the agreement:</tt></blockquote> | ||
| Line 140: | Line 144: | ||
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(e) the degree to which the agreement meets the objectives set out in section 161.</tt></blockquote></blockquote> | <blockquote><blockquote><tt>(e) the degree to which the agreement meets the objectives set out in section 161.</tt></blockquote></blockquote> | ||
Section 161 is the section that says why spousal support should be awarded. | [http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section148 Section 161] is the section that says why spousal support should be awarded. | ||
====Property and Debt==== | ====Property and Debt==== | ||
Section 93 of the ''Family Law Act'' talks about when the parts of an agreement about dividing property and dividing debt should be set aside. Like s. 164, s. 93 provides two legal tests to help the court decide whether an agreement should be set aside. The first test requires the court to look at what happened when the agreement was being negotiated and signed and is exactly the same as the test at s. 164(3). The second test allows the court set aside the agreement, even if there are no problems with the circumstances when the agreement was being negotiated and signed, if the agreement is "significantly unfair". However, to determine significant unfairness under s. 93(5), looks at three factors not five: | [http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/3rd_read/gov16-3.htm#section93 Section 93] of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' talks about when the parts of an agreement about dividing property and dividing debt should be set aside. Like s. 164, s. 93 provides two legal tests to help the court decide whether an agreement should be set aside. The first test requires the court to look at what happened when the agreement was being negotiated and signed and is exactly the same as the test at s. 164(3). The second test allows the court set aside the agreement, even if there are no problems with the circumstances when the agreement was being negotiated and signed, if the agreement is "significantly unfair". However, to determine significant unfairness under s. 93(5), looks at three factors not five: | ||
<blockquote><tt>(5) Despite subsection (3), the Supreme Court may set aside or replace with an order made under this Part all or part of an agreement if satisfied that none of the circumstances described in that subsection existed when the parties entered into the agreement but that the agreement is significantly unfair on consideration of the following:</tt></blockquote> | <blockquote><tt>(5) Despite subsection (3), the Supreme Court may set aside or replace with an order made under this Part all or part of an agreement if satisfied that none of the circumstances described in that subsection existed when the parties entered into the agreement but that the agreement is significantly unfair on consideration of the following:</tt></blockquote> | ||
| Line 150: | Line 154: | ||
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) the intention of the spouses, in making the agreement, to achieve certainty;</tt></blockquote></blockquote> | <blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) the intention of the spouses, in making the agreement, to achieve certainty;</tt></blockquote></blockquote> | ||
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(c) the degree to which the spouses relied on the terms of the agreement.</tt></blockquote></blockquote> | <blockquote><blockquote><tt>(c) the degree to which the spouses relied on the terms of the agreement.</tt></blockquote></blockquote> | ||
<!---HIDDEN | |||
==Further Reading in this Chapter== | ==Further Reading in this Chapter== | ||
| Line 156: | Line 160: | ||
* other chapters | * other chapters | ||
END HIDDEN---> | |||
==Page | ==Page resources and links== | ||
===Legislation=== | ===Legislation=== | ||
* [[Family Law Act]] | |||
* [[Divorce Act]] | |||
* [[Child Support Guidelines]] | |||
===Links=== | ===Links=== | ||
* | *[http://www.clicklaw.bc.ca/resource/2551 West Coast LEAF: Booklet on separation agreements and right to fairness] | ||
{{JP Boyd on Family Law Navbox|type=chapters}} | {{JP Boyd on Family Law Navbox|type=chapters}} | ||