2,443
edits
Difference between revisions of "Changing Family Law Agreements"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Changing Family Law Agreements (view source)
Revision as of 00:16, 16 April 2013
, 00:16, 16 April 2013→Property and Debt
Gayla Reid (talk | contribs) m |
Gayla Reid (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
Section 161 is the section that says why spousal support should be awarded. | Section 161 is the section that says why spousal support should be awarded. | ||
====Property and | ====Property and debt==== | ||
Section 93 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' talks about when the parts of an agreement about dividing property and dividing debt should be set aside. Like s. 164, s. 93 provides two legal tests to help the court decide whether an agreement should be set aside. The first test requires the court to look at what happened when the agreement was being negotiated and signed and is exactly the same as the test at s. 164(3). The second test allows the court set aside the agreement, even if there are no problems with the circumstances when the agreement was being negotiated and signed, if the agreement is "significantly unfair" | Section 93 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' talks about when the parts of an agreement about dividing property and dividing debt should be set aside. Like s. 164, s. 93 provides two legal tests to help the court decide whether an agreement should be set aside. The first test requires the court to look at what happened when the agreement was being negotiated and signed and is exactly the same as the test at s. 164(3). The second test allows the court set aside the agreement, even if there are no problems with the circumstances when the agreement was being negotiated and signed, if the agreement is "significantly unfair." However, to determine significant unfairness under s. 93(5), looks at three factors, not five: | ||
<blockquote><tt>(5) Despite subsection (3), the Supreme Court may set aside or replace with an order made under this Part all or part of an agreement if satisfied that none of the circumstances described in that subsection existed when the parties entered into the agreement but that the agreement is significantly unfair on consideration of the following:</tt></blockquote> | <blockquote><tt>(5) Despite subsection (3), the Supreme Court may set aside or replace with an order made under this Part all or part of an agreement if satisfied that none of the circumstances described in that subsection existed when the parties entered into the agreement but that the agreement is significantly unfair on consideration of the following:</tt></blockquote> | ||
| Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
* other chapters | * other chapters | ||
END HIDDEN---> | END HIDDEN---> | ||
==Page resources and links== | ==Page resources and links== | ||