Protecting and Enforcing Rights in Residential Care: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Marisa Chandler moved page C. Protecting and Enforcing the Rights in Residential Care to Protecting and Enforcing the Rights in Residential Care) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 17:26, 3 July 2014
This page from JP Boyd on Family Law—and other pages from this Wikibook that discuss BC family law litigation topics—are under editorial review to provide more thorough, current, and practical guidance. Since 2020, procedures, forms, and laws have changed significantly. While gross inaccuracies have been corrected, some details may still be outdated. These pages were not included in the 2024 print edition, and have been highlighted in orange where they appear in the navigation menu on this website. |
Complaints that rights have been violated[edit]
If a resident believes that his or her rights have been violated, the resident (or a person acting on his or her behalf) may submit a complaint under the Patient Care Quality Review Board Act. These will be treated as care quality complaints.
Protection for persons in care[edit]
The Residents’ Bill of Rights prohibits an Operator from retaliating against the resident because of a complaint made under the CCALA and Regulations, or made under the Patient Care Quality Review Board Act. They cannot “evict, discharge, intimidate, coerce, impose any pecuniary or other penalty on, suspend a service to, deny a right or benefit to or otherwise discriminate against a [resident] because of a complaint made in relation to the [resident].
No right to sue[edit]
As previously noted, there is no independent right of action or right of compensation based only on a violation of a resident’s rights under the Bill. However, it remains important evidence of legal duties owed by the operator, staff and health authorities to the resident or residents.
This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by BC Centre for Elder Advocacy and Support, June 2014. |