Small Claims Trials (20:XIV): Difference between revisions

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 89: Line 89:


Witnesses can be led on matters that are not in issue (e.g., their name, where they work, etc.).  Leading questions tend to be ones where the answer is either yes or no.  Leading the witness at the start will help the witness to relax.
Witnesses can be led on matters that are not in issue (e.g., their name, where they work, etc.).  Leading questions tend to be ones where the answer is either yes or no.  Leading the witness at the start will help the witness to relax.
When  asking  questions  about  issues  that  are  in  dispute  or  are  related  to  a  party’s  claim  or defence, that party should refrain from suggesting answers to the witness.  The witness must be allowed to give evidence in his or her own words.
A witness must authenticate all documents that are entered into evidence unless the parties have agreed to their authenticity.  When authenticating a document, pass three copies to the clerk:  one  for  the  judge,  one  for  the  court  record, and  another  for  the  witness.    Once  the witnessed has identified the document,  it will be entered into evidence and given an exhibit number.
When  the  other  party  is  conducting  its  direct  examination,  take  detailed  notes  for  cross-examination and closing arguments.
=== 7. Cross-Examination ===
Once the direct examination of a witness has concluded, the witness may be cross-examined by  the  other  party.    There  are  two  main  purposes  of  cross-examination:  to  point  out inconsistencies  and  omissions  and  to  introduce  facts  or conclusions.    If  the  witness  has performed poorly or has not been damaging, it may not be necessary to cross-examine that witness.
Some  questions  can  make  the  situation  worse.  A  witness  should  never  be  asked  to  repeat what  he  or  she  said  in “chief”.  This  only  emphasizes  the  point  and  allows  the  witness to clarify or minimise weaknesses                                           
At some point in cross-examination, the opposing version of the facts  should be put to the witness  to  allow  them  to  comment.  This  is  known  as  the rule  in ''Browne  v  Dunn''  and,  if  not followed, can result in less weight being placed on a witness’  evidence or the recall of adverse witnesses262.
A witness should not allow the cross-examiner to misconstrue their evidence. If a question is unclear, the witness should ask for clarification. Only the question asked should be answered and  additional  information  should  not  be  volunteered.  It  is okay  if  the  witness  does  not know the answer to a question; the witness should not guess the answer.
'''NOTE:''' Parties should not speak to their witnesses after cross-examination and before or during re-examination  about  the  evidence  or  issues  in  the  case  without  the  court’ s  permission263.  If such a discussion occurs, the witness’  evidence may be tainted and the court may not believe it.
=== 8. Re-Examination ===
If new evidence is introduced  during cross-examination that was not reasonably anticipated in direct examination or if a witness’  answer needs to be clarified or qualified, the judge may give  permission  to  re-examine  the  witness  on  the  new  evidence264.    During re-examination, leading questions cannot be asked.
=== 9. Closing Arguments ===
Closing  arguments  are  an  opportunity  for  each  party  to  persuade  the  judge  of  its  position.  Evidence that strengthens the case should be highlighted and evidence that weakens the case should  be explained  and  addressed.The  weaknesses  should be  addressed in  the  middle  of the closing so that the closing may start and finish on positive notes.
It may be necessary to comment on  the credibility of witnesses,  conflicts in testimony, and the insufficiency of evidence. The comments should be factual and allow the judge to arrive at a conclusion.

Revision as of 00:09, 5 July 2016



A trial is often very difficult, stressful, and unpredictable. If possible, it is generally in the best interests of all parties to settle. However, if the matter cannot be resolved at the settlement/trial conference, a trial will be scheduled255. The notice of trial will be sent by mail to the parties’ address on file. If a claimant does not attend the trial, the claim will be dismissed. If a defendant or third party does not attend, the claim will be allowed and judgment granted against the absent party.

Statements made by the claimants or the defendants at the settlement/trial conference are protected by settlement privilege and cannot be used at trial. A statement made during the settlement/trial conference is not admissible in cross-examination. Also, the judge at the settlement/trial conference will not be the trial judge. This allows the parties to discuss all issues without fear that their statements will be used against them at trial.

Parties should remember that settlement is possible at any time before the judge decides the case. This includes after evidence and arguments are heard at trial.

Parties should watch at least one trial in order to familiarise themselves with the correct procedure.

A. Simplified Trial for Claims up to $5,000

A Rule 9.1 simplified trial is set for one hour before an adjudicator. An adjudicator will usually be a justice of the peace but may occasionally be a judge. A justice of the peace adjudicator is referred to as “Your Worship”. Simplified trials are held in the evening in Vancouver and during the day in Richmond.

The parties must each file a Trial Statement at least 14 days before the trial date and serve each other party at least 7 days before the trial256. There are penalties for failing to comply to comply with these timelines257.

The trial does not need to comply with formal rules of procedure and evidence258. The adjudicator will ask questions and control the proceedings to stay within the one-hour timeframe.

B. Summary Trial for Financial Debt

At the Vancouver (Robson Square) registry, financial debt claims will be set for a half-hour summary trial before a judge. Financial debt claims are claims in which one of the parties is in the business of loaning money or extending credit. Often, little in the way of defence can be offered in situations of financial debt and the summary trial may in some ways come to resemble a payment hearing. Where a defence with some merit is advanced, the judge may send the claim to mediation, order a trial conference, or order a traditional trial259. The judge may conduct the trial without complying with the formal rules of evidence or procedure260. Note the rules requiring early disclosure of all relevant documents261.

C. Regular Trial

Rule 10 trials are held at all registries and are the most common form of small claims trial.

1. Courtroom Etiquette

  • Be on time. If you are late, apologize and be prepared to give an excellent explanation.
  • Introduce yourself and state your name clearly. Remember to spell your surname for the record.
  • Use simple words; do not use “legalese”.
  • Do not speak directly with opposing parties. Make submissions only to the judge and have him or her ask questions to the opposing party.
  • Never call witnesses by their given name. Use Mr., Ms., Miss, or Mrs. followed by their last name.
  • A judge of the Provincial Court is referred to as “Your Honour” and the clerk is referred to as “Madame Clerk” or “Mister Clerk”. When referring to another party, use Mr., Ms., Miss, or Mrs. followed by their last name or refer to them according to their status in the claim (e.g., the defendant).
  • Generally you should limit objections to issues that are of central importance to your case. If you have an objection, stand up quickly and say “objection”. The judge will acknowledge you and may ask for the reason you are objecting.

2. Court Room Layout

The judge’s bench is usually elevated above the rest of the court so the judge has a good view of the proceedings. The litigants’ table is in front of the judge, and the parties will come and sit there when their case is called. Often there is a raised lectern to hold papers when a litigant stands to ask questions. The court clerk's table is beside the witness box and between the litigants’ table and the judge’s bench. The witness box will be on either the judge’s left or right. The public gallery will fill up the remaining part of the courtroom. Parties will wait in the gallery until their case is called.

There will be microphones throughout. They do not amplify your voice and are for recording purposes only. Speak at a moderate speed and project your voice.

3. Check-In Procedure

The court clerk will ask ahead of time for the names of each party and, if they have one, their lawyer. Each party must tell the court clerk or judge as soon as possible if there are any preliminary motions or applications that should be heard first, whether there are any problems with witnesses and possible delays, and whether the number of witnesses or issues has changed from the settlement conference. This will help to determine the schedule of cases for the day and avoid as many delays as possible.

If all matters on a given day proceed to trial, the courtroom will often be overbooked, and you will be asked about the urgency of your trial. If you are not heard first, you may be given a choice to wait and see if another judge becomes available, or to adjourn to another date. If the trial has been previously adjourned, or expert or out of town witnesses are present, the trial will likely be given priority.

When the clerk has everyone organized, the judge will be called in. The clerk will announce, “order in court” and everyone must stand. The judge will bow before sitting and all parties should then bow in return before sitting. Next, the court clerk will call out the name of a case, at which time all parties in that case will come to the front and identify themselves to the judge.

4. General Order of Proceedings

a) Preliminary Motions

b) Claimant’s Case

  • Claimant’s opening statement
  • Claimant’s direct examination of its witnesses
  • Defendant’s cross-examination of the claimant’s witnesses
  • Claimant’s re-examination of its witnesses
  • Defendant’s re-examination of the claimant’s witnesses

c) Defendant’s Case

  • Defendant’s opening statement
  • Defendant’s direct examination of its witnesses
  • Claimant’s cross-examination of the defendant’s witnesses
  • Defendant’s re-examination of its witnesses
  • Claimant’s re-examination of the defendant’s witnesses

d) Closing Arguments

  • Claimant’s closing
  • Defendant’s closing
  • Claimant’s rebuttal

e) Judgment

5. Opening Statement

The claimant’s opening statement should summarise the facts surrounding the claim, the legal basis for the claim, and the relief that is sought. The defendant’s opening statement should summarise the defendant’s version of the facts and the reasons it opposes the claimant’s claim or the relief the claimant is seeking.

The opening statement should also alert the court to the types of evidence that will be presented and from whom the court will hear. Opening statements should not contain legal arguments and should be as brief as possible.

If there are witnesses other than the parties, the claimant should ask for an order excluding those witnesses from the courtroom.

6. Direct Examination

When each party is examining its own witness, it is that party’s direct examination. The party calling the witness should tell the court whether the witness will swear or affirm their testimony.

Witnesses can be led on matters that are not in issue (e.g., their name, where they work, etc.). Leading questions tend to be ones where the answer is either yes or no. Leading the witness at the start will help the witness to relax.

When asking questions about issues that are in dispute or are related to a party’s claim or defence, that party should refrain from suggesting answers to the witness. The witness must be allowed to give evidence in his or her own words.

A witness must authenticate all documents that are entered into evidence unless the parties have agreed to their authenticity. When authenticating a document, pass three copies to the clerk: one for the judge, one for the court record, and another for the witness. Once the witnessed has identified the document, it will be entered into evidence and given an exhibit number.

When the other party is conducting its direct examination, take detailed notes for cross-examination and closing arguments.

7. Cross-Examination

Once the direct examination of a witness has concluded, the witness may be cross-examined by the other party. There are two main purposes of cross-examination: to point out inconsistencies and omissions and to introduce facts or conclusions. If the witness has performed poorly or has not been damaging, it may not be necessary to cross-examine that witness.

Some questions can make the situation worse. A witness should never be asked to repeat what he or she said in “chief”. This only emphasizes the point and allows the witness to clarify or minimise weaknesses

At some point in cross-examination, the opposing version of the facts should be put to the witness to allow them to comment. This is known as the rule in Browne v Dunn and, if not followed, can result in less weight being placed on a witness’ evidence or the recall of adverse witnesses262.

A witness should not allow the cross-examiner to misconstrue their evidence. If a question is unclear, the witness should ask for clarification. Only the question asked should be answered and additional information should not be volunteered. It is okay if the witness does not know the answer to a question; the witness should not guess the answer.

NOTE: Parties should not speak to their witnesses after cross-examination and before or during re-examination about the evidence or issues in the case without the court’ s permission263. If such a discussion occurs, the witness’ evidence may be tainted and the court may not believe it.

8. Re-Examination

If new evidence is introduced during cross-examination that was not reasonably anticipated in direct examination or if a witness’ answer needs to be clarified or qualified, the judge may give permission to re-examine the witness on the new evidence264. During re-examination, leading questions cannot be asked.

9. Closing Arguments

Closing arguments are an opportunity for each party to persuade the judge of its position. Evidence that strengthens the case should be highlighted and evidence that weakens the case should be explained and addressed.The weaknesses should be addressed in the middle of the closing so that the closing may start and finish on positive notes.

It may be necessary to comment on the credibility of witnesses, conflicts in testimony, and the insufficiency of evidence. The comments should be factual and allow the judge to arrive at a conclusion.