Tenancy Agreements (19:IV): Difference between revisions

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(91 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 15, 2024}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = landlord}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = landlord}}


== A. Protecting the Tenant ==
== A. General ==


A third party should accompany a potential tenant during a rental unit showing, so there is a witness as to the landlord’s representations made during the  showing. Important: '''Get the landlord’s promises in writing if possible''', but note that landlords are '''not''' obligated to provide them in writing.  
A “tenancy agreement” is defined as “an agreement, whether written or oral, express or implied, between a landlord and a tenant respecting possession of a rental unit, use of common areas and services and facilities, and includes a licence to occupy a rental unit” (''RTA'', s 1). Like any valid contract, there must be an offer, acceptance, and consideration.


After establishing the tenancy and before the tenant moves their personal possessions into the rental unit, the RTA requires the landlord and tenant to  jointly conduct a condition inspection and fill out and sign the RTB’s Condition Inspection Report. The condition inspection should focus on verifying that the plumbing, electrical and appliances work; mould, and water marks are identified; and all telephone, cable and internet connections are present and functional. The tenant should take photographs at the initial move-in inspection, as well as the move-out inspection. The landlord must provide the tenant with a copy of the Condition Inspection Report within 15 days.  
A tenancy agreement gives the tenant the right to use, enjoy, and dispose of the property for some duration. The landlord has a freehold in reversion, allowing them to sell their property to someone else. A tenancy continues under the same terms when a rental property is sold in BC. Accordingly, the landlord cannot terminate a lease simply because they want to sell the property; instead, the new owner will take over as the landlord. No new lease is required to be drafted and signed, though this may happen if both parties agree.  


Fees for cable and internet should be negotiated before the tenancy commences, and included in the Tenancy Agreement.
=== 1. Two Methods of Creating a Tenancy Relationship ===
 
==== a) By Written Contract ====


The Residential Tenancy Branch provides a fillable and printable [http://www.rto.gov.bc.ca/documents/RTB-1.pdf Tenancy Agreement]. TRAC’s website has more  information as well as translations of the Tenancy Agreement forms into Punjabi, and Simplified and Traditional Chinese at http://www.tenants.bc.ca/other-languages.  
Although section 1 of the ''RTA'' contemplates tenancy agreements that are written, oral, or implied, a landlord must prepare in writing any tenancy agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2004 (''RTA'', s 13(1)).


== B. General ==
Vague terms of the tenancy agreement may be framed in the tenant's favour using the principle of contra proferentem, meaning that the agreement will be strictly construed against the party who provided the agreement's wording.


The “leasehold” or tenancy interest is an estate (a bundle of property rights) of limited duration, which is created and acquired by the “tenant” when a  person capable of granting that interest does so. Such a person (usually called the owner or landlord) conveys to the tenant the right of “exclusive  possession”. The interest that the landlord retains is called the “reversion”, and full possession reverts back to the landlord on the termination of the tenancy.
==== b) By Implied Contract ====


The landlord can sell his or her reversion to someone else, who becomes the new landlord and property owner. The tenancy follows the property, not the initial owner, so a tenancy agreement is still binding on a new owner, who is responsible for repaying the initial security and/or pet damage deposit when the tenancy ends (RTA, s 93).  
Notwithstanding the obligation to prepare a written agreement, where there has been offer, acceptance, and some kind of meaningful consideration, the law may imply the existence of a valid tenancy agreement. The law seeks to recognize and validate the relationship where possible, even where the requirement for a written tenancy agreement has not been met.


=== 1. Two Methods of Creating a Tenancy Relationship ===
Oral contracts are hard to prove. If something is important, it should be recorded in writing.


==== a) By Formal Contract ====
In a fixed term tenancy that does not require the tenant to vacate on the last day, if the landlord and tenant have not entered into a new tenancy agreement, they are deemed to have entered into a month to month tenancy on the same terms (''RTA'', s 44(3)).


A tenancy interest is granted by a contract known as a tenancy agreement or lease. Often the parties will enter into an express agreement (see [[{{PAGENAME}}#C. Contractual Nature of the Tenancy Agreement | Section  III.C: Contractual Nature of the Tenancy Agreement]]). The executed tenancy agreement governing the tenant’s possession may be written, or oral, or both (see the s 1 definition of “tenancy agreement”). To be enforceable, the  elements of a complete contract (offer, acceptance, and consideration) must be present (see [[Chapter 9: Consumer Protection]]). 
=== 2. Freedom of Contract and the Agreement ===


==== b) By Implied Contract ====
Parties may use a standard form tenancy agreement with or without an addendum for additional terms, or they may write their own. Parties are free to add and alter the terms, covenants, and conditions, subject to common law and statute restrictions, which include standard terms that the ''RTA'' and ''RTR'' require to be in every tenancy agreement.


Every tenancy agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2004 must be prepared in writing by the landlord (RTA, s 12(1)). Notwithstanding this obligation to prepare the agreement in writing, where a tenant is already in possession of the unit, or where rent has been paid, the law may imply the existence of a  valid tenancy agreement (see [[{{PAGENAME}}#2. Terms, Covenants, and Conditions | Section III.C.2: Terms, Covenants, and Conditions]]). This type of rental  agreement is quite common because many tenancies are entered into on the basis of an application form, or verbal consensus, without the existence of any  written contract. A “tenancy agreement” may be found to exist, notwithstanding the fact that:
==== a) What Tenancy Agreements Must Contain ====
*i) there is no written tenancy agreement;
*ii) a previously existing agreement has expired or terminated; or
*iii) there was no previous agreement of any kind.


If the person in possession pays rent or a deposit and the landlord accepts the payment with the intention of creating a tenancy, an agreement is created.  
The standard terms are the clauses that every tenancy agreement must contain (''RTR'', s 13(1)), and are found in the schedule of the ''RTR''. The standard terms cover key rights and responsibilities of both parties, including repairs, payment of rent, rent increases, security deposits, assignment or sublet, occupants and invited guests, entry of the residential premises by the landlord, locks, ending the tenancy, and the application of the ''RTA''. A tenancy agreement cannot be amended to change or remove a standard term (''RTA'', s 14(1)), making them a minimum standard that all tenancy agreements must achieve.  


=== 2. Where Something Other than a Tenancy is Created ===
All tenancy agreements must comply with the requirements laid out in section 13(2) of the ''RTA''. In addition to mandating that the tenancy agreement include the standard terms, a tenancy agreement must also contain the landlord and tenant’s agreement over certain key terms, such as the parties’ contact information, the duration of the tenancy, the amount and due date of the rent, and the amount and due date of any security or pet damage deposits to be paid.


An agreement or circumstances may create something other than a tenancy. A person may be a tenant at will, a tenant on sufferance, a licensee, or a mere occupant.  
Form RTB-1 is a standard tenancy agreement form that only contains the standard terms along with fillable boxes to complete the remaining mandatory terms; additional terms can be added as an addendum, or alternatively, the parties could use any other written document that conforms with the requirements from the ''RTA'' and ''RTR''. More information about tenancy agreement requirements and Form RTB-1 can be found [https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/housing-tenancy/residential-tenancies/starting-a-tenancy/tenancy-agreements here].


An occupant or person in possession who is not a tenant has no agreement with the landlord concerning that possession or occupation. In the case of a  licensee or occupant living in a home by permission of a main tenant (when the landlord/owner lives off-site), the main tenant is responsible for all obligations, including paying rent (and utilities if required). If the licensee or occupant is sharing a kitchen or bathroom with the landlord, the parties can seek remedies in Small Claims Court.
==== b) No Contracting Out of Tenancy Legislation ====


=== 3. Formal Requirements ===
As it is not possible to contract out of the ''RTA'' or ''RTR'' (''RTA'', s 5), a tenancy agreement cannot have terms that contradict the ''RTA'' or ''RTR''. A tenancy agreement cannot be subsequently amended to change or remove a standard term (''RTA'', s 14(1)).


==== a) Essential Elements of the Agreement ====
A tenancy agreement might purport to contain terms contrary to tenancy legislation, and this may not be identified in some cases until dispute resolution. A tenant is free to argue that a term violates the ''RTA'' or ''RTR'' and should, therefore, be void.


A landlord must prepare in writing every tenancy agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2004 (RTA, s 13(1)). A tenancy agreement must comply with  any requirements prescribed in the regulations and must set out all the requirements in RTA s 13(2). These requirements are available at the UBC Law Library, in the LSLAP resource files, or on the RTB website (see contact information in [[Introduction to Landlord and Tenant Law (19:I)#b) Resources and Policy Guidelines | Section I.B.1.b: Resources and Policy Guidelines]]).
==== c) Amendments and Subsequent Contracts ====


Where these elements are absent, vague, or unclear, the agreement may be void (as a result, no interest would be created). However, if the tenant is in possession and has paid money (i.e. rent) then there is a tenancy agreement. If a tenancy has been created (i.e. the tenant has possession and is paying  rent), any vague terms of the tenancy agreement can be framed in the tenant’s favour using the principle of ''contra proferentem'' (i.e. the agreement will  be strictly construed against the party seeking to rely on the contract), and perhaps even principles of statutory interpretation. The law seeks to recognize and validate the relationship where possible, even where the requirement to have a written tenancy agreement has not been met.  
The parties may enter additional or subsequent oral or written contracts on top of the tenancy agreement. If an RTB Arbitrator determines the terms are reasonable and not unconscionable, as defined within section 3 of the ''RTR'', new landlords or tenants that take over or enter into the same tenancy agreement would be bound by the subsequent contract.


=== 4. Agreements for Lease (Also Known as Agreements to Lease, or Agreements for Tenancy) ===
Changes in the tenancy agreement must be agreed upon by both the landlord and tenant (''RTA'', s 14(2)), in writing, and signed and dated by both parties. Generally, changes are only enforceable if both parties offer something in return for the other; however, a change without fresh consideration may be enforceable in the absence of duress, unconscionability, or other public policy concerns ([https://canlii.ca/t/hs3c5#par183 ''Rosas v Toca'', 2018 BCCA 191] at para 183).


“Agreements for tenancy” are executory contracts in which the lessor promises that he or she and the lessee will enter into a written tenancy agreement at  a later date. For an executory contract to have effect, generally the agreement must be in writing and must contain the essential elements of a lease. While the law states that the agreement must be in writing, this requirement is not always enforced. Consequently oral agreements may be considered valid. Also, the payment of money may point to the fact that a contract has been entered into. It should be noted that since this is simply an agreement to agree,  the RTA does not yet apply. At this point, any money paid is a processing fee, holding deposit, or administration fee. Section 15 of the RTA prohibits  fees to consider or process an application for tenancy.
==== d) Pets ====


If the money paid is part payment of rent or the security deposit (as distinct from a processing fee, holding deposit or administration fee), it is important to clearly identify that on the receipt at the time of payment (see definition of a security deposit). Until the tenant comes into possession, he or she has only a contractual interest, which applies only to “tenancy agreements”. Thus, failure to give the tenant possession is a breach of contract and not a violation of a property interest or breach of a tenancy covenant. When the tenant acquires possession, the agreement for lease is treated as a  lease agreement, and the court may order the lessor to execute a lease (specific performance): see ''Horse and Carriage Inn Ltd. v. Baron'', [1975] 53 DLR (3d) 426 (BCSC). Recording the initial exchange of money as “rent”or as “security deposit” is important to create a basic tenancy agreement in situations where there is only an “agreement to agree” in place, and where the tenant is not yet in possession of the rental unit.  
If the tenancy agreement is silent about pets, then the tenant can obtain one. Tenancy agreements are allowed to include terms that prohibit pets or restrict the size, kind, or number of pets a tenant may keep on the residential property, or otherwise govern the tenant’s obligations regarding keeping a pet on the rental property (''RTA'', s 18(1)). This is subject to the ''Guide Dog and Service Dog Act'', SBC 2015, c 17 (''RTA'', s 18(3)), which in section 3 prohibits a person from denying tenancy or from discriminating with respect to a term of the tenancy against a person who intends to keep a guide dog or service dog in the rental unit.


== C. Contractual Nature of the Tenancy Agreement ==
==== e) Cannabis ====


=== 1. Freedom of Contract and the Agreement ===
As of October 17, 2018, personal possession of cannabis is legal in Canada. Accordingly, changes to the ''RTA'' were implemented around growing and smoking cannabis.


Throughout the establishment and duration of the agreement, the parties are generally free to add and alter the terms, covenants and conditions as they see fit – subject to restrictions imposed by common law and statute (e.g. prohibition of contracts for an illegal purpose, '''unconscionable terms''', or contracts in restraint of trade). The RTA and MHPTA both restrict parties from contracting out of requirements of those Acts and from adopting terms that are contrary to the Acts. The changes in the tenancy agreement must be in writing, and be signed and dated by both parties. Some requirements, such as locks on  doors, are automatically included in every tenancy agreement even if the tenancy agreement does not specifically mention them. A unilaterally altered or newly included term may be unenforceable where there is no consideration for it.  
If a tenancy agreement entered into prior to legalization includes a clause prohibiting or limiting smoking and did not explicitly allow for smoking cannabis, then that clause is deemed to apply to smoking cannabis in the same way (''RTA'', s 21.1(2)). Vaporizing a substance containing cannabis is not “smoking cannabis” (''RTA'', s 21.1(3)).  


==== a) Collateral Contract ====
Most tenancy agreements entered into prior to legalization are deemed to contain a term prohibiting growing cannabis plants in or on the residential property. There is an exemption for existing operations in or on the residential property that met the following conditions on the day before legalization:
*the tenant is growing one or more medical cannabis plants (''RTA'', s 21.1(4)(a));
*growing the plants is not otherwise a violation of the tenancy agreement (''RTA'', s 21.1(4)(b));
*the tenant is authorized under federal law to grow the cannabis plants in or on the residential tenancy (''RTA'', s 21.1(4)(c)); and
*the tenant is in compliance with federal law with respect to the medical cannabis (''RTA'', s 21.1(4)(c)).


The parties may enter into additional or subsequent oral or written contracts, separate from the tenancy agreement, that involve a change in the way the terms of the tenancy agreement are carried out (e.g. agreement by the tenant to do repairs in return for paying a reduced amount of rent). The terms of the tenancy agreement still exist; they must be performed as stipulated when the collateral contract is fully performed or is otherwise terminated (e.g.  one party dies or goes away). If an Arbitrator determines the terms are reasonable and not unconscionable, as defined within s 3 of the RTR, any purchaser of the reversion will be bound by the former owner’s collateral contract. A remedy for the new landlord would be found in an action against the seller.  Generally speaking, oral collateral contracts are hard to prove. If something is important, it should be recorded in writing.
=== 3. Operation of Tenancy Agreement Terms ===


=== 2. Terms, Covenants, and Conditions ===
A term in a tenancy agreement consists of a promise by a person that a certain thing must or must not be done.


==== a) Covenants and Conditions ====
==== a) Material Terms ====


A covenant in a tenancy agreement consists of a promise by a person that a certain thing must or must not be done (the RTA eliminates the word “covenant” and uses the more modern word “term”). A “Material Term”, as used in the RTA, is a term going to the root of the relationship and the tenancy agreement.  Landlords and tenants may agree to any term they wish, as long as it is not unconscionable or contrary to the RTA. Terms contrary to the RTA may not be  identified in some cases until dispute resolution, and a tenant is free to argue that a term violates the RTA and should therefore be void. The Arbitrator will take this into consideration when determining reasonableness. For more information, see RTB Policy Guidelines 8: Unconscionable and Material Terms.  
From RTB PG 8, a material term is defined as a term of the tenancy agreement that, at the time of entering into the tenancy agreement, both parties agree is so important that the most trivial breach of the term entitles the other party to terminate the agreement.


A condition creates an obligation that arises in the event a certain thing does or does not happen. “Conditions precedent” are conditions that must be performed or satisfied before other obligations arise. “Conditions subsequent” cause existing obligations to cease when the conditions subsequent occur or are satisfied.
Not all terms of a tenancy agreement are material terms. The circumstances surrounding the creation of the tenancy agreement and the importance of the term in the tenancy agreement as a whole are more relevant to whether the term is material; meanwhile, the consequences of a breach are less relevant. Although RTB PG 8 states that whether the tenancy agreement declares the term to be material is less relevant, Arbitrators are likely to consider a term material if the agreement flags it as such. The same clause can be a material term in one tenancy but not material in another.


==== b) Express, Implied and Statutory Terms ====
==== b) Express, Implied and Statutory Terms ====


Valid '''express''' terms or conditions override any '''implied''' terms or “usual terms” that might otherwise apply at common law. For residential tenancies, the RTA deems some express terms to be unenforceable (see [[{{PAGENAME}}#d) Reasonable Terms | Section III.C.d: Reasonable Terms]] below). The RTA also establishes statutory terms, deemed to be terms in every agreement, that override any express or implied term to the contrary. For tenancies not governed by the RTA, a court will find implied obligations and insert the usual terms, if the parties have failed to expressly agree to certain matters.
Valid express terms override any implied terms or “usual terms” that might otherwise apply at common law. For residential tenancies, the ''RTA'' deems some express terms to be unenforceable. Furthermore, the terms that the ''RTA'' deems to be terms in every agreement override any express or implied term to the contrary.
 
==== c) Express Terms and Obligations ====
 
Parties may write their own tenancy agreement with their own terms, or may use a standard form tenancy agreement to which they can add their own extra terms. Parties may also adopt a lease in conformity with the ''Land Transfer Form Act'', RSBC 1996, c 252, p 2.  


The RTA requires that all tenancy agreements include standard terms outlining key statutory rights and responsibilities of the tenant and landlord (see RTA s 12, and the Schedule to the Regulation). The standard terms cover repairs, payment of rent, rent increases, security deposits, assignment or sub-let, occupants and invited guests, entry of the residential premises by the landlord, locks, ending the tenancy, and the application of the RTA. To assist landlords and tenants, the Ministry created a standard [http://bit.ly/1eiaQNL Residential Tenancy Agreement]. This Agreement incorporates suggestions put  forward by landlord and tenant stakeholders, and includes the prescribed terms found in the Schedule of the Regulation.  
For tenancies not governed by the ''RTA'', a court will find implied obligations and insert the usual terms if the parties have failed to expressly agree to certain matters.


For residential tenancies, the following express terms are '''void''' and '''unenforceable''':
==== c) Unenforceable Terms ====
*a term purporting to hold that the RTA does not apply to the agreement (s 5(1));
*that the rent remaining for the term of the agreement becomes due and payable if a tenant fails to comply with a term of the tenancy agreement (s 22) (i.e. “accelerated rent terms” are not permitted); or
*that the landlord can seize the tenant’s personal property for rent owing (s 26(3)(a)).           


Some included requirements of the RTA state that the tenant:  
A term of the tenancy is unenforceable if:
*must maintain reasonable health, cleanliness, and sanitary standards throughout the rental unit and other areas of the property to which the tenant has access;  
*the term is inconsistent with this ''RTA'' or the ''RTR'' (''RTA'', s 6(3)(a));
*shall not assign or sublet without the landlord’s written consent, where the agreement is for a period of six months or more; and
*the term is unconscionable (''RTA'', s 6(3)(b)); or
*shall not pay more than one-half of one month’s rent for each of the security deposit and/or pet damage deposit.  
*the term is not expressed in a manner that clearly communicates the rights and obligations under it (''RTA'', s 6(3)(c)).


Similarly, terms in a short form lease that are inconsistent with the RTA are unenforceable. The parties may however enter into a separate collateral agreement, under which a clause requiring the tenant to perform repairs is binding on the tenant, so long as there is separate consideration.
The definition of “unconscionable” for the purposes of determining whether a term of a tenancy agreement is enforceable is “if the term is oppressive or grossly unfair to one party” (''RTR'', s 3). Some of the factors determining whether a term meets this standard can include (RTB PG 8):
*whether it grossly impacts the health and living quality of one party;
*whether there is a rational basis for the term to exist in the agreement; or
*whether the term is so one-sided that it oppresses or exploits the party with weaker bargaining power.


==== d) Reasonable Terms ====
The following are examples of express terms that are void and unenforceable:
*a term purporting to hold that the ''RTA'' does not apply to the agreement or attempts to avoid the ''RTA'' (''RTA'', s 5);
*that the next payable rent becomes immediately due if a tenant fails to comply with a term of the tenancy agreement (''RTA'', s 22);
*that the landlord can seize the tenant’s personal property for rent owing (''RTA'', s 26(3)(a));
*terms that impose unreasonable restrictions on guests or impose a fee for having guests stay overnight (RTB PG 8); or
*for a fixed term tenancy, any vacate clauses that require the tenant to move out at the end of the tenancy unless:
**The tenancy agreement is a sublease agreement; or
**The fixed term tenancy was created in circumstances where the landlord or landlord’s close family plans in good faith to occupy the unit after the tenancy ends (''RTR'' s 13.1).


Changes in the RTA allow more ability to agree to any term landlords and tenants wish, than the repealed Act did.                                                       
== B. Protecting the Tenant During Agreement Formation ==


However, a term of tenancy is '''unenforceable''' if (RTA, s 6):
A third party may accompany a potential tenant during a rental unit showing, so there is a witness as to the landlord’s representations made during the showing. Tenants should get the landlord’s promises in writing if possible, but note that landlords are not obligated to provide them in writing.  
*a) the term is inconsistent with this RTA or the regulations;
*b) the term is unconscionable; or
**'''NOTE:''' The RTR defines “unconscionable” for the purposes of s 6(3)(b) of the RTA as follows: a term of a tenancy agreement is “unconscionable if the term is oppressive or grossly unfair to one party”.
*c) the term is not expressed in a manner that clearly communicates the rights and obligations under it.  


See Policy Guideline 8: Unconscionable and Material Terms.  
After establishing the tenancy and before the tenant moves their personal possessions into the rental unit, the landlord and tenant must jointly conduct a condition inspection and fill out and sign the RTB’s Condition Inspection Report (''RTA'', s 23). This report notes the condition of various elements of the rental unit, such as what needs to be repaired. It is a good idea to take photographs at the initial move-in inspection as well as the move-out inspection. The landlord must provide the tenant with a copy of the Condition Inspection Report within fifteen days (''RTA'', s 23(5)).  


==== e) Pets ====
=== 1. Illegal Application Fees ===


In B.C., there is no law that allows tenants to have a pet. RTA, s 18 allows a tenancy agreement to include terms that prohibit pets, or restrict the size, kind or number of pets a tenant may keep on the residential property. In order to keep a pet one needs to have a term in one’s tenancy agreement that allows pets. If a tenancy agreement doesn’t allow pets and a tenant gets one anyway, the landlord can tell the tenant to remove it. If the tenant refuses,  the landlord may be able to give an effective eviction notice. RTA, s 18 is subject to the rights and restrictions under the ''Guide Animal Act'' RSBC 1996, c 177, s 4, which states that landlords must not deny tenancy or impose discriminatory terms on a person with a disability who intends to keep a guide animal in the rental unit.  
A potential landlord cannot ask a renter or potential renter for application or processing fees relating to the following:
*accepting a tenancy application (''RTA'', s 15(a));
*processing the application (''RTA'', s 15(b));
*investigating the applicant’s suitability as a tenant (''RTA'', s 15(c)); or
*accepting the person as a tenant (''RTA'', s 15(a)).


===== (1) New Pet: Where Permitted =====
If someone has paid an application fee and the landlord will not give it back, they can apply for dispute resolution to have it returned. Applicants will need to know the landlord’s proper name and address and have proof that the fee was paid. If a landlord does this as a business practice, the tenant should report this to the director of the RTB, or to the RTB’s Compliance and Enforcement Unit (CEU), who can launch an investigation. For more information about the CEU, see [https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/housing-tenancy/residential-tenancies/solving-problems/tenancy-compliance-enforcement here]. 


The landlord and tenant together must inspect the condition of the rental unit on or before the day the tenant starts keeping a pet or on another mutually agreed day where the landlord permits the tenant to keep a pet after the start of a tenancy (RTA, s 23(2)). Failure of the tenant or landlord to participate in the inspection may extinguish the right of the failing  party  to  the  rights  relating  to the  pet  deposit  (s 24(1)).  The  landlord  can  request  a  pet  damage  deposit  not  greater than ½ of a month’ s rent, regardless of the number of pets. f)Prescribing Terms Terms  and conditions  that  must  or  must  not  be included  in every written  tenancy agreement,  or  an  application for  an  agreement,  may  be  prescribed  by  an  order-in-council  and  may  prescribe  different  terms  for  different classes  of  tenancy agreements.    As discussed above, the RTR sets out in its schedule those terms that must be included in every tenancy agreement. g)Implied Obligations and Usual Terms (1)Landlord’ s Obligations
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters15-23}}

Latest revision as of 07:54, 30 August 2024

This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on August 15, 2024.



A. General

A “tenancy agreement” is defined as “an agreement, whether written or oral, express or implied, between a landlord and a tenant respecting possession of a rental unit, use of common areas and services and facilities, and includes a licence to occupy a rental unit” (RTA, s 1). Like any valid contract, there must be an offer, acceptance, and consideration.

A tenancy agreement gives the tenant the right to use, enjoy, and dispose of the property for some duration. The landlord has a freehold in reversion, allowing them to sell their property to someone else. A tenancy continues under the same terms when a rental property is sold in BC. Accordingly, the landlord cannot terminate a lease simply because they want to sell the property; instead, the new owner will take over as the landlord. No new lease is required to be drafted and signed, though this may happen if both parties agree.

1. Two Methods of Creating a Tenancy Relationship

a) By Written Contract

Although section 1 of the RTA contemplates tenancy agreements that are written, oral, or implied, a landlord must prepare in writing any tenancy agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2004 (RTA, s 13(1)).

Vague terms of the tenancy agreement may be framed in the tenant's favour using the principle of contra proferentem, meaning that the agreement will be strictly construed against the party who provided the agreement's wording.

b) By Implied Contract

Notwithstanding the obligation to prepare a written agreement, where there has been offer, acceptance, and some kind of meaningful consideration, the law may imply the existence of a valid tenancy agreement. The law seeks to recognize and validate the relationship where possible, even where the requirement for a written tenancy agreement has not been met.

Oral contracts are hard to prove. If something is important, it should be recorded in writing.

In a fixed term tenancy that does not require the tenant to vacate on the last day, if the landlord and tenant have not entered into a new tenancy agreement, they are deemed to have entered into a month to month tenancy on the same terms (RTA, s 44(3)).

2. Freedom of Contract and the Agreement

Parties may use a standard form tenancy agreement with or without an addendum for additional terms, or they may write their own. Parties are free to add and alter the terms, covenants, and conditions, subject to common law and statute restrictions, which include standard terms that the RTA and RTR require to be in every tenancy agreement.

a) What Tenancy Agreements Must Contain

The standard terms are the clauses that every tenancy agreement must contain (RTR, s 13(1)), and are found in the schedule of the RTR. The standard terms cover key rights and responsibilities of both parties, including repairs, payment of rent, rent increases, security deposits, assignment or sublet, occupants and invited guests, entry of the residential premises by the landlord, locks, ending the tenancy, and the application of the RTA. A tenancy agreement cannot be amended to change or remove a standard term (RTA, s 14(1)), making them a minimum standard that all tenancy agreements must achieve.

All tenancy agreements must comply with the requirements laid out in section 13(2) of the RTA. In addition to mandating that the tenancy agreement include the standard terms, a tenancy agreement must also contain the landlord and tenant’s agreement over certain key terms, such as the parties’ contact information, the duration of the tenancy, the amount and due date of the rent, and the amount and due date of any security or pet damage deposits to be paid.

Form RTB-1 is a standard tenancy agreement form that only contains the standard terms along with fillable boxes to complete the remaining mandatory terms; additional terms can be added as an addendum, or alternatively, the parties could use any other written document that conforms with the requirements from the RTA and RTR. More information about tenancy agreement requirements and Form RTB-1 can be found here.

b) No Contracting Out of Tenancy Legislation

As it is not possible to contract out of the RTA or RTR (RTA, s 5), a tenancy agreement cannot have terms that contradict the RTA or RTR. A tenancy agreement cannot be subsequently amended to change or remove a standard term (RTA, s 14(1)).

A tenancy agreement might purport to contain terms contrary to tenancy legislation, and this may not be identified in some cases until dispute resolution. A tenant is free to argue that a term violates the RTA or RTR and should, therefore, be void.

c) Amendments and Subsequent Contracts

The parties may enter additional or subsequent oral or written contracts on top of the tenancy agreement. If an RTB Arbitrator determines the terms are reasonable and not unconscionable, as defined within section 3 of the RTR, new landlords or tenants that take over or enter into the same tenancy agreement would be bound by the subsequent contract.

Changes in the tenancy agreement must be agreed upon by both the landlord and tenant (RTA, s 14(2)), in writing, and signed and dated by both parties. Generally, changes are only enforceable if both parties offer something in return for the other; however, a change without fresh consideration may be enforceable in the absence of duress, unconscionability, or other public policy concerns (Rosas v Toca, 2018 BCCA 191 at para 183).

d) Pets

If the tenancy agreement is silent about pets, then the tenant can obtain one. Tenancy agreements are allowed to include terms that prohibit pets or restrict the size, kind, or number of pets a tenant may keep on the residential property, or otherwise govern the tenant’s obligations regarding keeping a pet on the rental property (RTA, s 18(1)). This is subject to the Guide Dog and Service Dog Act, SBC 2015, c 17 (RTA, s 18(3)), which in section 3 prohibits a person from denying tenancy or from discriminating with respect to a term of the tenancy against a person who intends to keep a guide dog or service dog in the rental unit.

e) Cannabis

As of October 17, 2018, personal possession of cannabis is legal in Canada. Accordingly, changes to the RTA were implemented around growing and smoking cannabis.

If a tenancy agreement entered into prior to legalization includes a clause prohibiting or limiting smoking and did not explicitly allow for smoking cannabis, then that clause is deemed to apply to smoking cannabis in the same way (RTA, s 21.1(2)). Vaporizing a substance containing cannabis is not “smoking cannabis” (RTA, s 21.1(3)).

Most tenancy agreements entered into prior to legalization are deemed to contain a term prohibiting growing cannabis plants in or on the residential property. There is an exemption for existing operations in or on the residential property that met the following conditions on the day before legalization:

  • the tenant is growing one or more medical cannabis plants (RTA, s 21.1(4)(a));
  • growing the plants is not otherwise a violation of the tenancy agreement (RTA, s 21.1(4)(b));
  • the tenant is authorized under federal law to grow the cannabis plants in or on the residential tenancy (RTA, s 21.1(4)(c)); and
  • the tenant is in compliance with federal law with respect to the medical cannabis (RTA, s 21.1(4)(c)).

3. Operation of Tenancy Agreement Terms

A term in a tenancy agreement consists of a promise by a person that a certain thing must or must not be done.

a) Material Terms

From RTB PG 8, a material term is defined as a term of the tenancy agreement that, at the time of entering into the tenancy agreement, both parties agree is so important that the most trivial breach of the term entitles the other party to terminate the agreement.

Not all terms of a tenancy agreement are material terms. The circumstances surrounding the creation of the tenancy agreement and the importance of the term in the tenancy agreement as a whole are more relevant to whether the term is material; meanwhile, the consequences of a breach are less relevant. Although RTB PG 8 states that whether the tenancy agreement declares the term to be material is less relevant, Arbitrators are likely to consider a term material if the agreement flags it as such. The same clause can be a material term in one tenancy but not material in another.

b) Express, Implied and Statutory Terms

Valid express terms override any implied terms or “usual terms” that might otherwise apply at common law. For residential tenancies, the RTA deems some express terms to be unenforceable. Furthermore, the terms that the RTA deems to be terms in every agreement override any express or implied term to the contrary.

For tenancies not governed by the RTA, a court will find implied obligations and insert the usual terms if the parties have failed to expressly agree to certain matters.

c) Unenforceable Terms

A term of the tenancy is unenforceable if:

  • the term is inconsistent with this RTA or the RTR (RTA, s 6(3)(a));
  • the term is unconscionable (RTA, s 6(3)(b)); or
  • the term is not expressed in a manner that clearly communicates the rights and obligations under it (RTA, s 6(3)(c)).

The definition of “unconscionable” for the purposes of determining whether a term of a tenancy agreement is enforceable is “if the term is oppressive or grossly unfair to one party” (RTR, s 3). Some of the factors determining whether a term meets this standard can include (RTB PG 8):

  • whether it grossly impacts the health and living quality of one party;
  • whether there is a rational basis for the term to exist in the agreement; or
  • whether the term is so one-sided that it oppresses or exploits the party with weaker bargaining power.

The following are examples of express terms that are void and unenforceable:

  • a term purporting to hold that the RTA does not apply to the agreement or attempts to avoid the RTA (RTA, s 5);
  • that the next payable rent becomes immediately due if a tenant fails to comply with a term of the tenancy agreement (RTA, s 22);
  • that the landlord can seize the tenant’s personal property for rent owing (RTA, s 26(3)(a));
  • terms that impose unreasonable restrictions on guests or impose a fee for having guests stay overnight (RTB PG 8); or
  • for a fixed term tenancy, any vacate clauses that require the tenant to move out at the end of the tenancy unless:
    • The tenancy agreement is a sublease agreement; or
    • The fixed term tenancy was created in circumstances where the landlord or landlord’s close family plans in good faith to occupy the unit after the tenancy ends (RTR s 13.1).

B. Protecting the Tenant During Agreement Formation

A third party may accompany a potential tenant during a rental unit showing, so there is a witness as to the landlord’s representations made during the showing. Tenants should get the landlord’s promises in writing if possible, but note that landlords are not obligated to provide them in writing.

After establishing the tenancy and before the tenant moves their personal possessions into the rental unit, the landlord and tenant must jointly conduct a condition inspection and fill out and sign the RTB’s Condition Inspection Report (RTA, s 23). This report notes the condition of various elements of the rental unit, such as what needs to be repaired. It is a good idea to take photographs at the initial move-in inspection as well as the move-out inspection. The landlord must provide the tenant with a copy of the Condition Inspection Report within fifteen days (RTA, s 23(5)).

1. Illegal Application Fees

A potential landlord cannot ask a renter or potential renter for application or processing fees relating to the following:

  • accepting a tenancy application (RTA, s 15(a));
  • processing the application (RTA, s 15(b));
  • investigating the applicant’s suitability as a tenant (RTA, s 15(c)); or
  • accepting the person as a tenant (RTA, s 15(a)).

If someone has paid an application fee and the landlord will not give it back, they can apply for dispute resolution to have it returned. Applicants will need to know the landlord’s proper name and address and have proof that the fee was paid. If a landlord does this as a business practice, the tenant should report this to the director of the RTB, or to the RTB’s Compliance and Enforcement Unit (CEU), who can launch an investigation. For more information about the CEU, see here.

© Copyright 2024, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society.