Enduring Power of Attorney (15:App A): Difference between revisions
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= | {{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= September 2, 2024}} | ||
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = guardianship}} | {{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = guardianship}} | ||
'''Important note to students regarding this precedent''': If students use this precedent (produced by the Ministry of the Attorney-General of BC) students should ensure that the automatic revocation of prior POAs (para 2) should not be included in the POA without very clear instructions from client that the client WANTS all prior POAs revoked (e. g. this would include prior bank POAs). | '''Important note to students regarding this precedent''': If students use this precedent (produced by the Ministry of the Attorney-General of BC) students should ensure that the automatic revocation of prior POAs (para 2) should not be included in the POA without very clear instructions from the client that the client WANTS all prior POAs revoked (e. g. this would include prior bank POAs). | ||
In addition, students should be aware that the “effective date” (para 9) works if there is only one attorney appointed. If more than one attorney is appointed, the POA cannot be used and will not be effective unless all attorneys have signed. | In addition, students should be aware that the “effective date” (para 9) works if there is only one attorney appointed. If more than one attorney is appointed, the POA cannot be used and will not be effective unless all attorneys have signed. | ||
Note that this POA precedent does not include custom clauses e. g. delegation, gifts, loans etc. If the client wishes to include custom clauses, the student should refer to ''Wills Precedents: An Annotated Guide'', Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia, 2019 (Bogardus, Wetzel & Hamilton) for precedent clauses. | Note that this POA precedent does not include custom clauses e. g. delegation, gifts, loans etc. If the client wishes to include custom clauses, the student should refer to ''Wills Precedents: An Annotated Guide'', Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia, 2019 (Bogardus, Wetzel & Hamilton) for precedent clauses. | ||
{{LSLAP Appendix PDF External Link | {{LSLAP Appendix PDF External Link | ||
Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters15- | {{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters15-23}} |
Latest revision as of 00:31, 3 September 2024
This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on September 2, 2024. |
Important note to students regarding this precedent: If students use this precedent (produced by the Ministry of the Attorney-General of BC) students should ensure that the automatic revocation of prior POAs (para 2) should not be included in the POA without very clear instructions from the client that the client WANTS all prior POAs revoked (e. g. this would include prior bank POAs).
In addition, students should be aware that the “effective date” (para 9) works if there is only one attorney appointed. If more than one attorney is appointed, the POA cannot be used and will not be effective unless all attorneys have signed.
Note that this POA precedent does not include custom clauses e. g. delegation, gifts, loans etc. If the client wishes to include custom clauses, the student should refer to Wills Precedents: An Annotated Guide, Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia, 2019 (Bogardus, Wetzel & Hamilton) for precedent clauses.
This appendix is available from its source for download in PDF. A permanent archive version is also available at https://perma.cc/T7FZ-TEYK. |
© Copyright 2024, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society. |