Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Contracts for Sale of Goods (11:III)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
no edit summary
m
Line 3: Line 3:
Generally, consumers have no right to return goods or cancel a contract simply because they decide the goods are no longer wanted or needed. However, it is often  only after the goods are purchased that damages or defects are discovered. In such cases, a purchaser may have a remedy if it can be shown that a term of the contract has been breached. It may also be the case that the business has a refund policy of which the consumer can take advantage.  
Generally, consumers have no right to return goods or cancel a contract simply because they decide the goods are no longer wanted or needed. However, it is often  only after the goods are purchased that damages or defects are discovered. In such cases, a purchaser may have a remedy if it can be shown that a term of the contract has been breached. It may also be the case that the business has a refund policy of which the consumer can take advantage.  


This section outlines the protection that consumers have against the problems that may occur after a purchase has been made. To understand one’s legal rights, it is necessary to know the differences between terms, representations, and mere puffs.
This section outlines the protection that consumers have against the problems that may occur after a purchase has been made. To understand one’s legal rights, it is necessary to know the differences between terms, representations, and mere puffs.  


== A. Identifying and Classifying the Terms of a Contract ==
== A. Identifying and Classifying the Terms of a Contract ==


A term of the contract is a promise made by the manufacturer or seller regarding the character or quality of an article. It can be either written or oral. Written terms will generally be straightforward to identify. Whether an oral statement can be properly considered a term may be less obvious. Not everything  said by the seller will be a term of the contract. To be a term, the statement must be a specific promise that makes up part of the contract.
A term of the contract is a promise made by the manufacturer or seller regarding the character or quality of an article. It can be either written or oral. Written terms will generally be straightforward to identify. Whether an oral statement can be properly considered a term may be less obvious. Not everything  said by the seller will be a term of the contract. To be a term, the statement must be a specific promise that makes up part of the contract.  


If a statement is not a term, it will be either a representation or a puff. A representation is a material statement of fact made to induce the other party to enter the contract. A puff is vague sales talk not meant to have any legal effect. For example, a statement that, “This is a wonderful car,” would be a puff.  
If a statement is not a term, it will be either a representation or a puff. A representation is a material statement of fact made to induce the other party to enter the contract. A puff is vague sales talk not meant to have any legal effect. For example, a statement that, “This is a wonderful car,” would be a puff.  


If a statement is a term of the contract, it can be a condition, warranty, or innominate term. A well-drafted contract will characterize particular terms as  conditions or warranties, though the wording used in the contract will not always be determinative. The difference between the three types of terms is as follows:
If a statement is a term of the contract, it can be a condition, warranty, or innominate term. A well-drafted contract will characterize particular terms as  conditions or warranties, though the wording used in the contract will not always be determinative. The difference between the three types of terms is as follows (''Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd'', [1962] 2 QB 26, [1962] 1 All ER 474 at para 49):  


=== 1. Condition ===
=== 1. Condition ===
5,109

edits