Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Family Law Act Basics"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
m
no edit summary
m
m
Line 125: Line 125:


#making decisions about the day to day care of the child;
#making decisions about the day to day care of the child;
#deciding where the child will live;
#deciding where the child <span class="noglossary">will</span> live;
#making decisions about the child’s schooling and extracurricular activities;
#making decisions about the child’s schooling and extracurricular activities;
#making decisions about the child’s health care; and,  
#making decisions about the child’s health care; and,  
#deciding how the child will be raised, including making decisions about things like religion, language and culture.
#deciding how the child <span class="noglossary">will</span> be raised, including making decisions about things like religion, language and culture.


When a child has more than one guardian, the guardians must usually make these decisions together. The guardians can agree or the court can order that only one guardian should have a particular parental responsibility. Both the Provincial Court and the Supreme Court can make orders about parental responsibilities.
When a child has more than one guardian, the guardians must usually make these decisions together. The guardians can agree or the court can order that only one guardian should have a particular parental responsibility. Both the Provincial Court and the Supreme Court can make orders about parental responsibilities.
Line 145: Line 145:
#give or withhold permission on behalf of a child, like about going on a school field trip or having a medical treatment.
#give or withhold permission on behalf of a child, like about going on a school field trip or having a medical treatment.


This is useful when a guardian is going to be sick or will be out of town for a period of time and someone else needs to care for the child, or if a child from outside British Columbia will be going to school here and an adult is needed to care for the child.
This is useful when a guardian is going to be sick or <span class="noglossary">will</span> be out of town for a period of time and someone else needs to care for the child, or if a child from outside British Columbia <span class="noglossary">will</span> be going to school here and an adult is needed to care for the child.


===What happens if a guardian has a terminal illness or dies?===
===What happens if a guardian has a terminal illness or dies?===
Line 157: Line 157:
The new person takes over as guardian when the first guardian dies or becomes unable to exercise parental responsibilities.
The new person takes over as guardian when the first guardian dies or becomes unable to exercise parental responsibilities.


A parent who is not a guardian does not automatically become the child’s guardian when a guardian dies.  If that parent wants to become the child’s guardian, he or she will have to get a court order.
A parent who is not a guardian does not automatically become the child’s guardian when a guardian dies.  If that parent wants to become the child’s guardian, he or she <span class="noglossary">will</span> have to get a court order.


===Parenting time and contact===
===Parenting time and contact===
Line 197: Line 197:
===What happens if a guardian wants to move?===
===What happens if a guardian wants to move?===


If a guardian wants to move and the move will have an impact on a child’s relationship with another guardian or someone who has contact with the child, the guardian must usually give 60 days’ notice of the move, in writing. The notice must say where the guardian plans on moving to and when the guardian plans on moving.
If a guardian wants to move and the move <span class="noglossary">will</span> have an impact on a child’s relationship with another guardian or someone who has contact with the child, the guardian must usually give 60 days’ notice of the move, in writing. The notice must say where the guardian plans on moving to and when the guardian plans on moving.


Only other guardians can object when a guardian plans on moving. If a guardian objects, he or she has 30 days to go to court to get an order preventing the move.
Only other guardians can object when a guardian plans on moving. If a guardian objects, he or she has 30 days to go to court to get an order preventing the move.
Line 208: Line 208:
#he or she has proposed reasonable plans to preserve the child’s relationship with the child’s other guardians, people who have contact with the child and other people who have an important role in the child’s life.
#he or she has proposed reasonable plans to preserve the child’s relationship with the child’s other guardians, people who have contact with the child and other people who have an important role in the child’s life.


The guardian who objects to the move must show that the move is not in the best interests of the child or the move will be allowed.
The guardian who objects to the move must show that the move is not in the best interests of the child or the move <span class="noglossary">will</span> be allowed.


When a guardian objects and the moving guardian and the objecting guardian share the child’s time equally or almost equally, the guardian who wants to move must show the court that:
When a guardian objects and the moving guardian and the objecting guardian share the child’s time equally or almost equally, the guardian who wants to move must show the court that:
Line 216: Line 216:
#the move is in the child’s best interests.
#the move is in the child’s best interests.


''Good faith'' means that the guardian wants to move isn’t planning on moving just to take the child away from another guardian, and that the move will likely improve the child’s quality of life or the guardian’s quality of life.
''Good faith'' means that the guardian who wants to move isn’t planning on moving just to take the child away from another guardian, and that the move <span class="noglossary">will</span> likely improve the child’s quality of life or the guardian’s quality of life.


The courts will have to figure out what "reasonable plans" to preserve the child’s relations with other people means, and what it means to say that a proposed move is or is not in a child’s best interests.
The courts <span class="noglossary">will</span> have to figure out what "reasonable plans" to preserve the child’s relations with other people means, and what it means to say that a proposed move is or is not in a child’s best interests.


==The Law About Child Support==
==The Law About Child Support==
Line 269: Line 269:
===What about if the payor dies?===
===What about if the payor dies?===


If the payor has a life insurance policy, the parties can agree and the court can order that the payor keep the policy up to date and name a person, usually the recipient, as the beneficiary of the policy. This way, the child will still be supported if the payor dies.
If the payor has a life insurance policy, the parties can agree and the court can order that the payor keep the policy up to date and name a person, usually the recipient, as the beneficiary of the policy. This way, the child <span class="noglossary">will</span> still be supported if the payor dies.


The parties can agree and the court can order that the payor’s obligation to pay child support will continue after the payor’s death and be paid from his or her estate.  Court orders about this can be made at the time the child support order is made or after the payor’s death.
The parties can agree and the court can order that the payor’s obligation to pay child support <span class="noglossary">will</span> continue after the payor’s death and be paid from his or her estate.  Court orders about this can be made at the time the child support order is made or after the payor’s death.


==The Law About Spousal Support==
==The Law About Spousal Support==
Line 329: Line 329:
===Reviews===
===Reviews===


It can sometimes be very difficult to figure out when spousal support should end. The person getting support usually wants support to continue for as long as possible. The person paying support wants support to end as soon as possible. It is hard to settle on an end date if, for example, it’s not known when a spouse will finish job training, become self-sufficient or recover from an illness.  
It can sometimes be very difficult to figure out when spousal support should end. The person getting support usually wants support to continue for as long as possible. The person paying support wants support to end as soon as possible. It is hard to settle on an end date if, for example, it’s not known when a spouse <span class="noglossary">will</span> finish job training, become self-sufficient or recover from an illness.  


People often try to avoid this problem by agreeing that spousal support will be paid for now, but that will be reconsidered in the future, called a ''review'', after a certain amount of time has passed or when a certain event has happened.  
People often try to avoid this problem by agreeing that spousal support <span class="noglossary">will</span> be paid for now, but that <span class="noglossary">will</span> be reconsidered in the future, called a ''review'', after a certain amount of time has passed or when a certain event has happened.  


The ''Family Law Act'' says that agreements and orders for spousal support can be reviewable. Agreements and orders for reviewable spousal support can specify:
The ''Family Law Act'' says that agreements and orders for spousal support can be reviewable. Agreements and orders for reviewable spousal support can specify:


#what will trigger the review;
#what <span class="noglossary">will</span> trigger the review;
#the dispute resolution process that will be used at the review; and,
#the dispute resolution process that <span class="noglossary">will</span> be used at the review; and,
#the factors that will be considered at the review.
#the factors that <span class="noglossary">will</span> be considered at the review.


The ''Family Law Act'' says that a review can also be triggered when someone begins to receive a pension, even if the agreement or order for spousal support doesn’t call for the review.
The ''Family Law Act'' says that a review can also be triggered when someone begins to receive a pension, even if the agreement or order for spousal support doesn’t call for the review.
Line 343: Line 343:
===What about if the payor dies?===
===What about if the payor dies?===


If the payor has a life insurance policy, the parties can agree and the court can order that the payor keep the policy up to date and name a person, usually the recipient, as the beneficiary of the policy. This way, the spouse will still be supported if the payor dies.
If the payor has a life insurance policy, the parties can agree and the court can order that the payor keep the policy up to date and name a person, usually the recipient, as the beneficiary of the policy. This way, the spouse <span class="noglossary">will</span> still be supported if the payor dies.


The parties can agree and the court can order that the payor’s obligation to pay spousal support will continue after the payor’s death and be paid from his or her estate.  Court orders about this can be made at the time the spousal support order is made or after the payor’s death.
The parties can agree and the court can order that the payor’s obligation to pay spousal support <span class="noglossary">will</span> continue after the payor’s death and be paid from his or her estate.  Court orders about this can be made at the time the spousal support order is made or after the payor’s death.


Note that the rules about life insurance and support when the payor dies are the same for spousal support as they are for child support.
Note that the rules about life insurance and support when the payor dies are the same for spousal support as they are for child support.
Line 364: Line 364:
Under the ''Family Law Act'':
Under the ''Family Law Act'':


#married spouses have to start a court proceeding to divide property and debt within two years of the date of their divorce or the annulment of their marriage; and,
#married spouses have to start a court proceeding to divide property and debt within two years of the date of their divorce or the annulment of their marriage; and,
#unmarried spouses have to start a proceeding to divide property and debt within two years of the date they separated.
#unmarried spouses have to start a proceeding to divide property and debt within two years of the date they separated.


Line 398: Line 398:
''Family debt'' is all debt incurred by either spouse after the date the spouses began to live together or got married, whichever was first, up to the date of separation.
''Family debt'' is all debt incurred by either spouse after the date the spouses began to live together or got married, whichever was first, up to the date of separation.


Family debt also includes debt incurred after the date of separation if the debt was incurred for to maintain family property, like repairing the family home or paying the mortgage.
Family debt also includes debt incurred after the date of separation if the debt was incurred to maintain family property, like repairing the family home or paying the mortgage.


===How are property and debt divided?===
===How are property and debt divided?===
Line 417: Line 417:
The court can divide family property and family debt unequally if an equal division would be "significantly unfair". The court can take into account a number of reasons why an equal division could be significantly unfair including:
The court can divide family property and family debt unequally if an equal division would be "significantly unfair". The court can take into account a number of reasons why an equal division could be significantly unfair including:


# length of the spouses’ relationship;
#length of the spouses’ relationship;
#a spouse’s contribution to the other spouse’s career;
#a spouse’s contribution to the other spouse’s career;
#whether the amount of family debt is more than the value of family property;
#whether the amount of family debt is more than the value of family property;
Line 423: Line 423:
#any taxes owing from dividing the property.
#any taxes owing from dividing the property.


The courts will have to figure out what "significantly unfair" means. The old law doesn’t use this term.
The courts <span class="noglossary">will</span> have to figure out what "significantly unfair" means. The old law doesn’t use this term.


====Excluded property====
====Excluded property====
Line 454: Line 454:
Agreements and orders about dividing pensions are carried out by the people who administer the pension plans, not by the spouse who owns the pension.  
Agreements and orders about dividing pensions are carried out by the people who administer the pension plans, not by the spouse who owns the pension.  


Note that the division of pensions can be very, very complicated. It is always best to speak to a lawyer about issues problems with pensions.
Note that the division of pensions can be very, very complicated. It is always best to speak to a lawyer about issues with pensions.


====Canada Pension Plan credits====
====Canada Pension Plan credits====
Line 476: Line 476:
===Children’s Property===
===Children’s Property===


Children sometimes get large amounts of money or property from inheritances, insurance policies or court awards. Under the ''Family Law Act'', a child’s guardians are not automatically the trustees of the child’s property, except for property below a certain value or of a certain type that will be decided by regulation.
Children sometimes get large amounts of money or property from inheritances, insurance policies or court awards. Under the ''Family Law Act'', a child’s guardians are not automatically the trustees of the child’s property, except for property below a certain value or of a certain type that <span class="noglossary">will</span> be decided by regulation.


A guardian may apply to court to be appointed as trustee for the child’s property. Only the Supreme Court can make orders about children’s property.
A guardian may apply to court to be appointed as trustee for the child’s property. Only the Supreme Court can make orders about children’s property.
Line 553: Line 553:
#parenting coordination.
#parenting coordination.


People can make an agreement that they will resolve a family law problem, or a family law problem that might arise in the future, using a family dispute resolution process.
People can make an agreement that they <span class="noglossary">will</span> resolve a family law problem, or a family law problem that might arise in the future, using a family dispute resolution process.


===How are family dispute resolution processes supported?===
===How are family dispute resolution processes supported?===
Line 582: Line 582:
In mediation, the mediator helps people reach their own settlement. Although some mediators also give information about the law and may offer an opinion about a person’s position, mediators do not make decisions for people and do not have the power to impose a settlement.
In mediation, the mediator helps people reach their own settlement. Although some mediators also give information about the law and may offer an opinion about a person’s position, mediators do not make decisions for people and do not have the power to impose a settlement.


When mediation is successful, the parties will usually sign a separation agreement to document their settlement. Separation agreements can be filed in court and be enforced like court orders.
When mediation is successful, the parties <span class="noglossary">will</span> usually sign a separation agreement to document their settlement. Separation agreements can be filed in court and be enforced like court orders.


===Collaborative processes===
===Collaborative processes===


Lawyers who have special additional training can help people resolve a family law dispute through collaborative processes. When people agree to use a collaborative process, they and their lawyers sign an agreement that they will use their best efforts to resolve the dispute outside of court, and that if the parties do have to go to court they will hire new lawyers.
Lawyers who have special additional training can help people resolve a family law dispute through collaborative processes. When people agree to use a collaborative process, they and their lawyers sign an agreement that they <span class="noglossary">will</span> use their best efforts to resolve the dispute outside of court, and that if the parties do have to go to court they <span class="noglossary">will</span> hire new lawyers.


Collaborative processes work like negotiation but involve other professionals when their participation will help the parties to reach a settlement:
Collaborative processes work like negotiation but involve other professionals when their participation <span class="noglossary">will</span> help the parties to reach a settlement:


#clinical counsellors or psychologists can be involved as ''divorce coaches,'' helping the parties work through their emotions;
#clinical counsellors or psychologists can be involved as ''divorce coaches,'' helping the parties work through their emotions;
Line 594: Line 594:
#accountants, appraisers and tax specialists can be involved to help figure out complicated financial problems.
#accountants, appraisers and tax specialists can be involved to help figure out complicated financial problems.


When a collaborative process is successful, the parties will usually sign a separation agreement to document their settlement. Separation agreements can be filed in court and be enforced like court orders.
When a collaborative process is successful, the parties <span class="noglossary">will</span> usually sign a separation agreement to document their settlement. Separation agreements can be filed in court and be enforced like court orders.


===Arbitration===
===Arbitration===
Line 637: Line 637:
===What happens when there’s a proceeding in each court?===
===What happens when there’s a proceeding in each court?===


Starting a court proceeding in one court doesn’t stop an proceeding being started in the other court, unless the claims made in the second proceeding have already been dealt with by the first court. Section 194 of the ''Family Law Act'' talks about what happens when there is a proceeding in each court:
Starting a court proceeding in one court doesn’t stop an proceeding being started in the other court, unless the claims made in the second proceeding have already been dealt with by the first court. Section 194 of the ''Family Law Act'' talks about what happens when there is a proceeding in each court:


#the making of an order by one court doesn’t stop an application in the other court, unless the application is about the same thing as the order made by the first court;
#the making of an order by one court doesn’t stop an application in the other court, unless the application is about the same thing as the order made by the first court;
Line 694: Line 694:
#pay up to $5,000 to another person or as a fine.
#pay up to $5,000 to another person or as a fine.


Where nothing else will get a party to obey a court order, the court may order that the party be imprisoned for up to 30 days.
Where nothing else <span class="noglossary">will</span> get a party to obey a court order, the court may order that the party be imprisoned for up to 30 days.


Both the Provincial Court and the Supreme Court can enforce orders.
Both the Provincial Court and the Supreme Court can enforce orders.