LSLAP Program Information for Wills and Estate (16:XIII)

This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on August 21, 2024.

This section is specific to LSLAP clinicians. It sets out internal LSLAP practices and policies regarding Wills & Estates.

A. LSLAP File Administration Policy – Wills and Estate Planning

The only wills and estates issues LSLAP can responsibly provide assistance to the public is the drafting of certain types of simple wills. Clinicians should refer clients to qualified wills and estates lawyers for all other issues. In addition, the clinician should only prepare a will for persons meeting our income criteria and whose estates are:

• Small (under $25,000); and
• Consist entirely of personal property, no real property (the future as well as present situation must be considered), with all of the estate located in British Columbia.

In addition to simple wills for individuals, LSLAP is only able to prepare “mirror wills” for clients, not “mutual wills”. A mirror will is designed for couples with similar wishes. The wills of the couple “mirror” each other: each leaves the same gifts to the other and each names the other as Executor.

By contrast, a mutual will includes a statement that the will-maker agrees not to change or revoke their will without the consent of another party (usually the spouse). This agreement will potentially bind the will-maker even if the other party predeceases the will-maker. Thus, a mutual will has a contractual component, in theory creating a constructive trust. However, a will-maker can always change their will and testament. If a will-maker changes their last will and testament after the other party has died, the will-maker may create a right of action for beneficiaries of the preceding mutual will (which created the constructive trust) for breach of the trust.

Note that signing mutual wills is not a widespread practice. If a client is seeking LSLAP’s assistance in preparing a mutual will, the client must be directed to a qualified practitioner. It can be suggested that the client should discuss with a qualified practitioner the possibility of creating an inter vivos trust instead of preparing a mutual will.

Note that if you are assisting two clients to make mirror wills (or any time you are jointly representing clients), you should provide both clients with a joint representation agreement. This agreement must contain the information required by the Law Society of British Columbia.

LSLAP’s policy is that anyone who can afford a lawyer should be referred to one. A practitioner’s fee might vary from $500 to $700 for a relatively simple will. However, this material has been prepared for appropriate cases where the client meets LSLAP’s income criteria.

Because the law on wills is strictly applied, precedents should be used to provide certainty. Any lack of clarity may defeat the intention of the will-maker, who will not, of course, be available to clarify contentious points once they have passed away. Also, LSLAP clinicians should not take instructions from a person on behalf of someone else; they can prepare a will only for the client. The final will must then be reviewed with the client to ensure that it reflects their wishes and that they understand what the document means (see Section III.D: Executing the Will and Section III.E: Attesting the Will).

Important changes to wills and estates law due to WESA have been highlighted in this chapter. However, LSLAP clinicians should refer clients to private lawyers if they are unsure how certain WESA provisions should be interpreted.

Finally, LSLAP will not draft a will that disinherits potential beneficiaries. In other words, LSLAP is unable to help with clients wishing to eliminate spouses and children. Clients wishing to disinherit potential beneficiaries should be referred to a private lawyer.

NOTE: Before drafting a will for a First Nations person, please consult with the supervising lawyers. The client will most likely have to be referred to an outside lawyer. There are many complexities with First Nations wills, and LSLAP will likely not be able to assist.

LSLAP’s Supervising Lawyer must be consulted on every will and must review the final product before it is sent to the client to be executed.

B. LSLAP File Administration Policy - Probate and Taxation

LSLAP does not advise clients on probate issues. Such clients should be referred to a private lawyer. The potential liability in administering estates is too great to permit greater LSLAP clinician involvement; the client should always be referred to a lawyer.

Estate taxation is complicated. Clients should be referred to lawyers who specialize in these matters or the CRA, which has agents who specialize in estate taxation.

C. Taking Instructions During the Initial Interview

The purpose of the initial interview is for the LSLAP clinician to complete the Will Instructions Questionnaire (Appendix A) with the client in order to later actually draft the will. LSLAP clinicians should never draft a will for a client during the initial interview. All wills must be approved by the supervising lawyer before they can be mailed or delivered to clients. At the end of the interview, the clinician should have a clear and full understanding of the client’s personal circumstances, assets, and desired distribution of their estate. The clinician should also have sufficient information to later assess the client’s testamentary capacity with the supervising lawyer. If there is any doubt as to a person’s capacity, consult LSLAP’s Supervising Lawyer.

The LSLAP clinician should keep the following things in mind during the initial interview:

1. Speak directly with the will-maker, never an intermediary.
2. Interview the will-maker alone, not in the presence of the beneficiaries or spouses, except where taking joint instructions from spouses for mirror wills.
3. Inquire into the nature and extent of the will-maker’s property.
   1. Ask about any prior wills (to ensure that all property and prior wills are satisfactorily dealt with, and to ensure that the will-maker knows of all the property being disposed of).
   2. Ask the will-maker about the existence of property that may not form part of the estate (e.g. real estate in joint tenancy, joint bank accounts with survivorship rights, insurance policies and pension plans with named beneficiaries, Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs), Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs), and Registered Retirement Income Funds (RRIFs)).
   3. Ensure that the will-maker understands that such properties, if there are valid beneficiary designations in place, do not form part of the estate and their dispositions are independent of the will and its effects.
4. Have the will-maker read the Will Instructions Questionnaire over, section by section, or read it aloud to them.

NOTE: The LSLAP office has a precedent file, which may be consulted for the structure of various clauses. Clinicians may also see the Continuing Legal Education wills precedent book or any book on will precedents.

D. Undue Influence and Suspicious Circumstances

In order to ensure there is no undue influence, clinicians should follow the British Columbia Law Institute’s Recommended Practices for Wills Practitioners Relating to Potential Undue Influence: A Guide when conducting an interview with a client looking for assistance on making a will.

Interview the will-maker alone

This practice allows the interviewer to satisfy themselves that the will-maker has testamentary capacity. The exception to the practice of meeting the client alone is where one is taking joint instructions from spouses for mirror wills. Should it appear that the instructions are not reciprocal, other than differing specific bequest of personal items (e.g. jewellery to daughter, tools to son) one should not take further instructions. Some lawyers will not take instructions for a new will from one of the parties if that lawyer had previously taken mirror or mutual wills instructions for both. Some lawyers will take unilateral instructions that conflict with the earlier mirror will, provided they are also given express instructions to inform the client’s spouse that new will instructions have been received.

Ask non-leading, open-ended questions to determine factors operating on the will-maker’s mind

Examples of this type of questions include:

• How/why did you decide to divide your estate this way?
• Why did you choose [proposed executor] as the executor of your will?
• What was important to you in making these decisions?

Again, this ensures what the will-maker tells the interviewer to include in their will what truly represents their wishes.

Explore whether the will-maker is in a relationship of dependency, domination or special confidence or trust

Examples of questions to ask include:

• Do you live alone? With family? A caregiver? A friend?
• Has anything changed in your living arrangements recently?
• Are you able to go wherever and whenever you wish?
• Does anyone help you more than others?
• Who arranged/suggested this meeting?
• Does anyone help you make decisions? Who does your banking?
• Has anyone asked you for money? A gift?

Explore whether the will-maker is a victim of abuse or neglect in other contexts

When interviewing, the interviewer should be aware of the will-maker’s physical safety. If necessary and appropriate, refer the will-maker to support resources. Sample questions to consider include:

• Has anyone ever hurt you? Has anyone taken anything that was yours without asking?
• Has anyone threatened you? Are you alone a lot?
• Has anyone ever failed to help you take care of yourself when you needed help?
• Are there people you like to see? Have you seen these people or done things recently with them?
• Has anyone ever threatened to take you out of your home and put you in a care facility?

Obtain relevant information from third parties when possible and if the will-maker consents

Obtain a medical assessment if mental capacity is also in question, but remember that mental capacity to make a will is ultimately a legal test

Compile a list of events or circumstances indicating undue influence. See the section below for red flags

Make and retain appropriate records whenever red flags are present

If suspicion remains high after reasonable investigation, decline retainer to prepare the will

E. Red Flags for Undue Influence

The British Columbia Law Institute’s list of red flags below may indicate the presence of undue influence on a will-maker. The list is non-exhaustive, and the presence of some factor does not provide an affirmation of undue influence. Use the list as a cautionary guide when preparing a will. Refer to the British Columbia Law Institute’s Recommended Practices for Wills Practitioners Relating to Potential Undue Influence: A Guide for more details on each of the facts listed below. Some examples of red flags that may indicate the presence of undue influence include:

• Will-maker invests significant trust and confidence in a person who is a beneficiary or is connected to a beneficiary (e.g. lawyer, doctor, clergy, financial advisor, accountant, formal or informal caregiver, new “suitor” or partner)
• Will-maker experiences isolation due to dependence on a beneficiary for physical, emotional, financial or other needs
• Physical, psychological and behavioural characteristics of the will-maker
• Circumstances related to the making of the will and/or the terms
• Characteristics of influencers in the will-maker’s family or circle of acquaintance
• Interviewer’s “gut feeling”

© Copyright 2024, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society.