Spousal Support Arrears: Difference between revisions
From Clicklaw Wikibooks
→Retroactive reduction of support
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(i) arises from a change described in subsection (2) (a), and </tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> | <blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(i) arises from a change described in subsection (2) (a), and </tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> | ||
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(ii) is related to the relationship between the spouses, and </tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> | <blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(ii) is related to the relationship between the spouses, and </tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> | ||
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) the changed circumstances, had they existed at the time the order was made, would likely have resulted</tt></blockquote></blockquote> | <blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) the changed circumstances, had they existed at the time the order was made, would likely have resulted in a different order.</tt></blockquote></blockquote> | ||
Retroactive variation applications are relatively new. In 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada established rules for applying for retroactive child support, or for a retroactive increase in child support. This is the case of ''D.B.S. v S.R.G.'' discussed in the chapter, [[Making Changes to Child Support]]. In the recent case of ''[http://canlii.ca/t/g80ht G.M.W. v D.P.W.]'' 2014 BCCA 282, our Court of Appeal said these principles also apply to applications for a retroactive reduction of support. Both involve child support, but the rules will be similar for spousal support. For another example, see ''[http://canlii.ca/t/27qrq P.M B. v. M.L.B.]'', 2010 NBCA 5, in particular paragraph five. | Retroactive variation applications are relatively new. In 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada established rules for applying for retroactive child support, or for a retroactive increase in child support. This is the case of ''D.B.S. v S.R.G.'' discussed in the chapter, [[Making Changes to Child Support]]. In the recent case of ''[http://canlii.ca/t/g80ht G.M.W. v D.P.W.]'' 2014 BCCA 282, our Court of Appeal said these principles also apply to applications for a retroactive reduction of support. Both involve child support, but the rules will be similar for spousal support. For another example, see ''[http://canlii.ca/t/27qrq P.M B. v. M.L.B.]'', 2010 NBCA 5, in particular paragraph five. | ||
