Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Criminal Charges (1:IV)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Line 39: Line 39:
* Tertiary—the detention is necessary to maintain confidence in the administration of justice (includes seriousness of the offence charged and strength of the Crown’s case).
* Tertiary—the detention is necessary to maintain confidence in the administration of justice (includes seriousness of the offence charged and strength of the Crown’s case).


Often during the show-cause hearing, the focus becomes the conditions an accused person can be released upon and the adequacy of the accused’s bail plan. This is particularly the case where an accused by virtue of section 515(6) of the ''Criminal Code'' has the onus of establishing that the court can safely release them from custody. A release plan may include sureties, cash deposit or restrictive conditions such as a curfew or an area restriction. Sureties can only be imposed when less onerous forms of release are inadequate. The Crown will usually have specific concerns about an accused’s behaviour. Previously, the law required conditions of release to be as minimally restrictive on a person’s freedom as possible while still addressing the cause for concern.
Often during the show-cause hearing, the focus becomes the conditions an accused person can be released upon and the adequacy of the accused’s bail plan. This is particularly the case where an accused, by virtue of section 515(6) of the ''Criminal Code'', has the onus of establishing that the court can safely release them from custody. A release plan may include sureties, a cash deposit or restrictive conditions such as a curfew or an area restriction. A surety is a person who agrees to be responsible for an accused and agrees to pay a sum of money to the court if they are not successful in making sure the accused follows their bail conditions and attends court as required. Sureties can only be imposed when less onerous forms of release are inadequate. The Crown will usually have specific concerns about an accused’s behaviour.


Currently, over 50% of inmates in provincial remand centres consist of individuals detained prior to their trial. Pre-trial detention can last as long as 24 months, inmates are held in crowded conditions, and Indigenous individuals are overrepresented among them. Furthermore, detention can hurt an accused’s ability to provide a full defence and may lead to induced guilty pleas. Therefore, the bail decision can be life-changing to an accused individual. However, because of the temporary nature of bail and the length of time the court process takes, bail decisions are rarely appealed.
Currently, over 50% of inmates in provincial remand centres consist of individuals detained prior to their trial. Pre-trial detention can last as long as 24 months, inmates are held in crowded conditions, and Indigenous individuals are overrepresented among them. Furthermore, detention can hurt an accused’s ability to provide a full defence and may lead to induced guilty pleas. Therefore, the bail decision can be life-changing to an accused individual. However, because of the temporary nature of bail and the length of time the court process takes, bail decisions are rarely appealed.


In response to these problems, the Supreme Court of Canada modified the test for judicial interim release in ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc27/2017scc27.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAOciB2IGFudGljIDIwMTcAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=1 R v Antic]'', 2017 SCC 27 and ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2019/2019scc18/2019scc18.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAOciB2IG15ZXJzIDIwMTkAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=1 R v Myers]'', 2019 SCC 18 [''Myers'']. The court emphasized that the accused should be released at the earliest reasonable opportunity and on the least onerous grounds. The test in ''Myers'' requires a bail plan that reduces the risk of the accused re-offending to a reasonable level. There is no longer any requirement to address the risk completely. Furthermore, the Court in Myers allowed for accused to be released from detention in order to receive treatment for mental health conditions and issues with substance abuse; this may help reduce the rate of re-offence and help defence counsel achieve better sentences for these accused.
In response to these problems, the Supreme Court of Canada modified the test for judicial interim release in ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc27/2017scc27.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAOciB2IGFudGljIDIwMTcAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=1 R v Antic]'', 2017 SCC 27 and ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2019/2019scc18/2019scc18.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAOciB2IG15ZXJzIDIwMTkAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=1 R v Myers]'', 2019 SCC 18 [''Myers'']. Previously, the law required conditions of release to be as minimally restrictive on a person’s freedom as possible while still addressing the cause for concern. The court has now emphasized that the accused should be released at the earliest reasonable opportunity and on the least onerous grounds. The test in ''Myers'' requires a bail plan that reduces the risk of the accused re-offending to a reasonable level. There is no longer any requirement to address the risk completely. Furthermore, the Court in Myers allowed for accused persons to be released from detention in order to receive treatment for mental health conditions and issues with substance abuse; this may help reduce the rate of re-offence and help defence counsel achieve better sentences for these accused.


Bill C-75, An Act to amend the ''Criminal Code'', the ''Youth Criminal Justice Act'' and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, 42nd Parliament, 2019, cl 210 (received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019, coming into force on December 18, 2019) [Bill C-75] amended the ''Criminal Code'' to add sections 493.1 and 493.2 regarding releasing accused that are in custody. In short, the amendment emphasized the rulings in ''R v Antic'' and ''R v Myers'', stating that peace officers, justices, and judges should place the highest priority on releasing an accused at the earliest possible opportunity and on the least onerous grounds. Furthermore, section 493.2 obligates peace officers, justices, and judges to give particular attention to the circumstances of aboriginal accused and those accused who belong to vulnerable populations that are overrepresented in the criminal justice system and are disadvantaged in obtaining release.
Bill C-75, An Act to amend the ''Criminal Code'', the ''Youth Criminal Justice Act'' and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, 42nd Parliament, 2019, cl 210 (received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019, coming into force on December 18, 2019) [Bill C-75] amended the ''Criminal Code'' to add sections 493.1 and 493.2 regarding releasing accused that are in custody. In short, the amendment emphasized the rulings in ''R v Antic'' and ''R v Myers'', stating that peace officers, justices, and judges should place the highest priority on releasing an accused at the earliest possible opportunity and on the least onerous grounds. Furthermore, section 493.2 obligates peace officers, justices, and judges to give particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal accused and those accused who belong to vulnerable populations that are overrepresented in the criminal justice system and are disadvantaged in obtaining release.


=== 5. Warrant in the first instance ===
=== 5. Warrant in the first instance ===
5,109

edits