Alternatives to Divorce (3:VII): Difference between revisions
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*Void marriages, which are null and void ''ab initio'' (from the outset); and | *Void marriages, which are null and void ''ab initio'' (from the outset); and | ||
*Voidable marriages, which are valid until a court of competent jurisdiction grants a declaration of nullity (although such a declaration has the effect of invalidating the marriage from its beginning). | *Voidable marriages, which are valid until a court of competent jurisdiction grants a declaration of nullity (although such a declaration has the effect of invalidating the marriage from its beginning). | ||
| Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
:a) Either of the parties was, at the time of the marriage, still married to another party; | :a) Either of the parties was, at the time of the marriage, still married to another party; | ||
:b) One of the parties did not consent to the marriage; | :b) One of the parties did not consent to the marriage; | ||
:c) The parties are related within the bonds of consanguinity (descent from a common ancestor); or | :c) The parties are related within the bonds of consanguinity (descent from a common ancestor); or | ||
:d) The formal requirements imposed by provincial statute (such as the ''BC Marriage Act'') are not fulfilled. | :d) The formal requirements imposed by provincial statute (such as the ''BC Marriage Act'') are not fulfilled. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 20: | ||
:a) Either party is impotent or otherwise unable to consummate the marriage (as opposed to unwilling to consummate the marriage, which may constitute cruelty but does not render the marriage voidable: see ''[https://canlii.ca/t/54b4 Juretic v Ruiz]'', 1999 BCCA 417); or | :a) Either party is impotent or otherwise unable to consummate the marriage (as opposed to unwilling to consummate the marriage, which may constitute cruelty but does not render the marriage voidable: see ''[https://canlii.ca/t/54b4 Juretic v Ruiz]'', 1999 BCCA 417); or | ||
:b) A party is under 14 years of age. | :b) A party is under 14 years of age. | ||
Revision as of 23:13, 9 November 2025
| This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on June 23, 2024. |
A. Annulment
An annulment differs conceptually from a divorce because a divorce terminates a legal status, whereas an annulment is a declaration that the parties’ marital status never properly existed. A declaration of nullity may be obtained for two types of marriages:
- Void marriages, which are null and void ab initio (from the outset); and
- Voidable marriages, which are valid until a court of competent jurisdiction grants a declaration of nullity (although such a declaration has the effect of invalidating the marriage from its beginning).
A marriage is void ab initio if:
- a) Either of the parties was, at the time of the marriage, still married to another party;
- b) One of the parties did not consent to the marriage;
- c) The parties are related within the bonds of consanguinity (descent from a common ancestor); or
- d) The formal requirements imposed by provincial statute (such as the BC Marriage Act) are not fulfilled.
Misrepresentation is a ground for annulment only where the misrepresentation leads to a mistake about the identity of the other party or as to the nature of the marriage ceremony. A voidable marriage is valid until one of the parties to it obtains a declaration of nullity. The declaration must be obtained during the parties’ joint lives and is not available if the parties are already divorced. In Canada, a marriage may be voidable in the following circumstances:
- a) Either party is impotent or otherwise unable to consummate the marriage (as opposed to unwilling to consummate the marriage, which may constitute cruelty but does not render the marriage voidable: see Juretic v Ruiz, 1999 BCCA 417); or
- b) A party is under 14 years of age.
These are common law rules.
NOTE: If a marriage is found to be void, this does not affect the property claims that a party might have. Pursuant to s. 21 of the FLA, the matrimonial regime still applies in this situation.
B. Judicial Separation
The Court can no longer grant a judicial separation. Judicial separation was formerly used to sever the legal obligations and liabilities between a married couple without terminating the marriage, when a spouse’s religion forbade divorce.
| © Copyright 2025, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society. |
