Avenues to Address Crime for Victims (4:IV)

This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on July 13, 2024.

A. Pursuing the Matter Through the Criminal System

Apart from the initial report to police, the victim is not responsible for the prosecution of the offender. The burden to conduct the case is on the Crown. The crime is also against the community, and the victim is a witness to this crime. Whether the victim wants to proceed, drop charges, or testify has little bearing on the criminal case.

Police can make an arrest if there are reasonable grounds for the police to believe that an offence has been committed, if there is a warrant, or if they find a person committing an offence. If the Crown believes that there is a substantial likelihood of conviction and that it is in the public interest to prosecute, a charge is laid. However, if the police decide not to recommend charges and if the explanation is unsatisfactory, the victim may want to discuss the situation with a superior officer. In BC, the police are not responsible for laying charges; they are responsible for completing an incident report or a Report to Crown Counsel if they are recommending charges, but it is up to Crown to determine whether charges will be laid. If Crown has not approved charges and the explanation is not satisfactory, the victim may wish to discuss the matter with a more senior Crown Counsel. If still not satisfied, the victim may write to Regional Crown Counsel. Finally, it may be appropriate to write to the BC Attorney General in Victoria.

A factsheet outlining complaints processes for justice agencies has been developed for victims and is available Complaints Processes for Justice Agencies in British Columbia.

For individuals in situations which they believe are dangerous, but are not assaults, sexual assault, or other more common types of violent offences, there are various sections of the Criminal Code that may be relevant. If an individual is a victim of one of these offences, it is within their rights to contact the police and ask that charges be laid. The following is a list of some related offences:

• s 264(1): Criminal Harassment;
• s 264.1: Uttering Threats;
• s 346: Extortion;
• s 372(1): False Messages;
• s 372(2): Indecent Phone Calls;
• s 372(3): Harassing Phone Calls;
• s 423: Intimidation;
• s 425: Offences by Employers (Threats and Intimidation);
• s 430: Mischief (Damage to Property); and
• s 810: Breaching a Peace Bond.

1. Seeking Restitution Orders

If the accused is convicted of an offence, the victim may submit an application for an order that the accused pay an amount by way of compensation for loss or damage to property suffered by the applicant as a result of the commission of an offence. This is known as a restitution order and can be found under s 738 of the Criminal Code. The application must be made early enough for the judge to render a decision at the time of sentencing and the loss must be quantifiable. Restitution amounts must be easily calculable and not in great dispute.

For all convictions or section 730 discharges, the judge is required to consider making a restitution order (Criminal Code, s 737.1(1)) and victims must be given a reasonable opportunity to indicate whether they are seeking restitution (Criminal Code, s 737.1(2)). A judge is entitled to decide against making a restitution order, although they must provide reasons if omitting a restitution order against a victim’s wishes (Criminal Code, s 737.1(5)).

Restitution will not be ordered in all cases where there is monetary loss or damages. The judge must consider whether a restitution order should be included in the sentence and whether all aspects of the sentence reflect the purposes and principles of sentencing and are appropriate given the circumstances of the offence and the particular offender. The ability of the offender to pay a restitution order will be a consideration, although an offender’s financial circumstances do not prevent a court from making a restitution order (Criminal Code, s 739.1). Restitution cannot be ordered for pain and suffering or other damages which can only be assessed in the civil courts.

The only aspects of physical injury or psychological harm that can be covered by restitution are those that are quantifiable from a cost perspective and that take place prior to sentencing (Criminal Code, s 737.1(2)). A judge can order restitution for financial losses related to:

• damaged or lost property due to the crime (Criminal Code, s 738(1)(a));
• physical injury or psychological harm due to the crime (Criminal Code, s 738(1)(b));
• physical injury due to the arrest or attempted arrest of the offender (Criminal Code, s 738(1)(c));
• costs for temporary housing, food, childcare and transportation due to moving out of the offender's household (this only applies if a victim has moved because they had been physically harmed or threatened with physical harm due to the offence, arrest, or attempted arrest of the offender) (Criminal Code, s 738(1)(c));
• costs that victims of identity theft had to pay to re-establish their identity, and to correct their credit history and their credit rating (Criminal Code, s 738(1)(d));
• reasonable expenses for the removal of intimate images published without consent on the internet or other digital network (Criminal Code, s. 738(1)).

This makes it distinct from the more general and less quantifiable “pain and suffering.”

Although the restitution order is made by a criminal court as part of an offender’s sentence, it is like a civil order in some respects. If the offender does not pay the amount ordered, the victim can file the order in the civil court and use civil enforcement methods to collect the money (Criminal Code, s 741(1)). For example, bank accounts may be seized, or liens may be placed on property.

2. The Canadian Victims Bill of Rights

The CVBR recognizes that crime has a harmful impact on victims and on society. This Act lists out the rights of victims, as well as those who are authorized to act on their behalf. Section 3 provides that if the victim has passed away or is otherwise incapable of acting on their own behalf, another person may be able to act on their behalf.

A victim is defined as a person who has suffered physical or emotional harm, property damage, or economic loss as a result of a crime (CVBR, s 2). However, if a person is charged with or convicted of the offence that resulted in the victimization, they are not defined as a victim; the same applies if a person that suffers the harm or loss is found not criminally responsible for the offence that resulted in the victimization due to a mental disorder (CVBR, s 4). Furthermore, a victim is entitled to exercise their rights under this Act only if they are present in Canada or if they are a Canadian citizen or permanent resident (CVBR, s 19(2)).

Adhering to this definition, victims of crime can exercise their rights under this Act while an offence is being investigated or prosecuted and while the offender is going through the corrections or conditional release process (CVBR, s 18). The offence committed against the victim must fall under the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act, or the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act (CVBR, s 2). The rights also apply to some offences under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and parts of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (CVBR, s 2).

The rights apply to offences which occur in Canada. They also apply if the offence is investigated and prosecuted in Canada or if the offender is serving a sentence or conditional release in Canada (CVBR, s 5).

Victims have the right to:

• request information (CVBR, ss 6–8);
• have their security and privacy considered by the appropriate authorities and be protected by the criminal justice system (CVBR, ss –11);
• participate by presenting victim impact statements, and receive testimonial aids when testifying (CVBR, ss 13, 15;
• request that their identity be protected (CVBR, s 11);
• have the court consider making a restitution order against the offender (CVBR, s 16);
• have a restitution order entered as a civil court judgment that is enforceable against the offender (CVBR, s 17).

No cause of action, right to damages, or right to appeal any decision or order arises from an infringement or denial of a right under this Act (CVBR, s 28).

If not satisfied by the response of the federal department, agency, or body, victims have the right to file a complaint with the relevant authority (CVBR, s 25). Victims also have the right to file a complaint if they are of the opinion that their rights under this Act have been infringed or denied by a provincial or territorial department, agency, or body, subject to the laws of that province or territory (CVBR, s 26). All federal departments and agencies that have responsibilities under this Act need to provide a way for victims to file complaints (CVBR, s 25(3)). Complaints against a provincial or territorial agency, like police or victim services, will be addressed through the appropriate provincial or territorial laws.

Additional information can be found at Victims' Roles and Rights in the Criminal Justice System - Canada.ca.

3. Court Orientation, Preparation and Accompaniment

If a charge is laid, the victim may be asked to testify as a witness, or the victim may want to deliver a victim impact statement. They can receive help from Victim Service Workers, who can explain their rights, the type of support available and their role in the criminal justice process. Victim Service Workers can also help with CVAP applications, and provide victims with information about subpoenas, pre-trial meetings with Crown, the court process, as well as court accompaniment for victims who attend court. Victim impact statements allow the judge to determine whether a restitution order is required if the victim experiences a financial loss and any information on the statement may be used to impact the sentencing process for the offender. For more information, including guides for both child and adult witnesses, and on victim impact statements, is available at Court Support for Victims of Crime - gov.bc.ca.

Under s 486 of the Criminal Code, witnesses can receive testimonial accommodations such as testifying behind a screen, on video camera to not see the offender, or in a closed court upon application. The Crown counsel in charge of prosecuting the offence will generally ask the victim whether they would like testimonial accommodation but victims can also speak with the Crown counsel to discuss the matter.

Victims can also request language assistance, including visual language assistance, if they are required to testify in court. The Ministry of Justice provides court interpreters to translate criminal and family law court proceedings in a variety of different languages. Additional language support for other court-related activities is available through outside organizations. Individuals can find a full list of language assistance services available at Translation Services - gov.bc.ca.

4. Things victims and witnesses should know about participating in a criminal trial

There are many resources available to witnesses to assist them during the court process and mitigate stress that arises from testifying. However, prior to agreeing to be a witness in a criminal case, a person must understand that the process may be an intrusive and uncomfortable experience. This is particularly relevant to victims, who in the process of testifying may feel retraumatized and contribute to feelings of revictimization.

a) All witnesses are generally compellable

Once a person agrees to provide evidence or disclose that they were involved in or witnessed a crime, a subpoena can be issued compelling them to attend court on a specific date to give evidence (Criminal Code, s 698). Individuals who have been served with a subpoena and fail to show up to court, or later refuse to give evidence at trial, may be arrested and charged with contempt, which carries a punishment including imprisonment of up to 90 days (Criminal Code, s 708). Further, if a person provides false evidence in court, they can be charged with perjury, which carries a punishment of imprisonment up to 14 years (Criminal Code, ss 131–132).

b) Cross-examination can be stressful

Cross-examination can be a stressful experience for a witness. Defence counsel will likely challenge a witness’ evidence to show that they are not a credible witness or that the evidence they are giving is unreliable (see R v Parent, 2000 BCPC 11). Defence counsel will generally do this by showing that the witness’s testimony is inconsistent with other independent evidence, they have made prior inconsistent statements, or their testimony has changed during direct examination and cross-examination. Defence counsel may also attempt to show that the witness has a motive to lie or mislead the court, which may include cross-examining them on any bias or prejudice they have towards the accused. Even if a witness appears credible, the defence may attempt to show that their evidence is unreliable because they are mistaken about what they saw.

c) Discreditable conduct of a witness can be used to challenge their credibility

Section 12 of the Canadian Evidence Act states “a witness may be questioned as to whether the witness has been convicted of any offence, excluding any offence designated as a contravention under the Contraventions Act, but including such an offence where the conviction was entered after a trial on an indictment.” In R v Cullen, 52 CCC (3d) 459 the Ontario Court of Appeal stated at para 9 that, “for the purpose of challenging a witness’ credibility, cross-examination is permissible to demonstrate that a witness has been involved in discreditable conduct.” Therefore, apart from the accused, any witness can not only be cross-examined on any criminal record that they have, but they can also be cross-examined on the details of those convictions, any pending charges, acquittals, or any other discreditable conduct which they may not have been charged with. For example, the defence may hire a private investigator to follow a witness to gather evidence on their conduct. If the witness was participating in discreditable conduct, the defence could use this evidence during a cross-examination as a means of discrediting the witness in court.

d) An accused can make an application to have third-party records of witnesses such as counselling records disclosed

The defence can make an application to a trial judge for the disclosure of third-party records, which include medical, psychiatric, therapeutic, and counselling records. Although the burden is higher for sexual offences, under s 278.3 of the Criminal Code, the defence can make an application to a trial judge for the disclosure of such records. This also includes personal records such as a victim’s journal or diary. The disclosure of these records can be traumatizing for a witness or victim, particularly victims of a sexual offence.

The process the court undergoes when deciding whether to admit the records involves “the balancing of the rights of the accused under ss 7 and 11 of the Charter with the privacy rights of the complainant.” Unlike documents which the prosecution has in their possession, the burden is on the accused to prove that third-party records should be disclosed because the information is not part of the prosecution’s case, and third-parties have no obligation to assist the defence. However, under s 278.5 if the trial judge is satisfied that the defence’s application is made in accordance with s 278.3, and that they have established that the record is likely relevant to an issue at trial or to the competence of the witness to testify, and production of the record is necessary in the interests of justice, they may order the third party to produce the records. The trial judge will then review the records and may order their disclosure to the accused under s 278.7.

5. Victim Travel Fund

The BC Victim Travel Fund provides funding to a maximum of $3,000 per family/victim to help attend and participate in interviews, hearings, and other justice-related proceedings. Funding is available to victims who have suffered significant physical or emotional trauma from a serious criminal offence, and victims who require a support person to attend a proceeding. Funding is also available to immediate family members of deceased victims (e.g., parents, spouse, children, and siblings). Eligible expenses may include meals, accommodation, and the most economical form of travel. Applicants for the Victim Travel Fund must also meet the following criteria:

• the applicant must make the applications prior to the justice proceeding;
• the applicant has to travel more than 100 km one way to attend the justice proceeding;
• the justice proceeding must take place in BC and the proceeding is expected to impact the outcome, disposition or results of the proceeding or hearing (this excludes provincial parole and federal hearings); and
• travel and related expenses are not covered by Crown counsel, the CVAP, or any other source.

For more information or to apply for the Victim Travel Fund, see this page: Victim Travel Assistance.

B. Parole Board of Canada Hearings

If a conviction occurs, victims may still be affected later on by decisions to release the offender(s). Victims who wish to attend Parole Board of Canada (PBC) hearings may apply for financial assistance, including for travel, hotel, and meal expenses. In order to be eligible, victims must have registered with Correctional Service Canada (CSC). For information on registering, visit Registering as a Victim of Crime -csc-scc.gc.ca.

Support persons may also be eligible for funding. An eligible support person must be an adult over the age of 18 years of age who is chosen by the registered victim. Support persons may include relatives, friends or victim service workers. Support persons who wish to attend a PBC hearing with a registered victim must submit a written request to the office of the PBC in the region where the hearing will take place, once the victim has received notice from CSC/PBC of potential hearing dates. A security screening will be conducted for all visitors before they are allowed into a penitentiary. If the support person is accompanying the victim to the hearing, but does not intend to go to the hearing, then a security screening is not required. Please note, however, that if the support person should need to enter the penitentiary, the security screening would be required.

Please note that this is only available for federally supervised offenders and that applications should be submitted at least 30 days before the hearing date. For more information, visit Attending Parole Board of Canada Hearings - justice.gc.ca.

C. Pursuing the Matter in a Civil (Tort) Action

Criminal courts determine whether the accused is guilty, and if so, what would be the appropriate punishment. However, the criminal court will do little in the way of providing compensation for the victim, other than possibly making a restitution order. In this regard, a victim may sue an alleged offender regardless of the offender’s verdict at a criminal trial. Receiving financial compensation from the offender for the damages caused is one of the reasons why survivors of violence sue in civil court.

A civil suit may also give the victim access to compensation from third parties and institutional defendants (e.g. government institutions, foster homes, and residential schools) upon whom liability may be imposed. This is beneficial where the individual perpetrator has few assets or none at all.

Pursuant to the Limitation Act, RSBC, c 266, in most cases, there is a two-year limitation on initiating a claim in tort (s 6). However, there are exceptions to this rule. In BC, there is an exemption to the two-year time limit for cases of sexual assault (s 3(1)(j)). The Limitation Act also allows for an exemption for physical assault claims for minors and for adults who were living in a personal or dependent relationship with their abuser (s 3(1)(k)). The rationale for these exemptions is that those victims may not be expected to recognize the impact of what has happened to them and have the ability to bring a claim within a limitation period.

Bringing a civil action may be a long process and the plaintiff should consider the personal toll and financial costs it may impose on them. Some victims who go through this process feel as though their lives are on hold and are unable to get on with other parts of their lives. Remember, however, that in many cases the parties will settle, although the outcomes of negotiations are extremely difficult to predict. Some people may benefit from counselling while pursuing a civil action.

Victims should be referred to a lawyer who is experienced with this area of law. There may be issues and circumstances in each particular case that make it difficult to assess the probability of success. Some lawyers may be willing to take on a case on a contingency fee basis, which means that they will get a certain percentage of any damages, if they are awarded.

A victim must not be pressured into making a decision not in their interests, so others must not take control of the victim’s decisions. A victim should be informed of their options and the potential consequences of each course of action in order to allow them to give informed instructions to counsel.

1. A Civil Suit is Separate from the Criminal Case

The fact that an accused has not been criminally charged or has been acquitted of criminal charges is not a bar to commencing civil proceedings as the legal issues and the standard of proof are different. The difficulty with recovering anything directly from the accused is that they seldom have assets that could support a damage award made by the court.

The burden of proof in a civil trial is lower than in a criminal trial, but the evidence must still be clear and convincing. As a plaintiff in a civil action, a survivor of physical or sexual assault must prove on a balance of probabilities that the assault was perpetrated by the defendant named in the action, and that this assault resulted in damages. This is a less stringent test than that placed upon the Crown in criminal proceedings, where the case must be established beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, it is possible for a victim to win a civil suit even in the event there has been a previous acquittal in criminal proceedings.

Pursuing the matter through the criminal justice system is best done before any civil action is taken, given that:

• in a criminal case, the investigation is conducted by the police who are public servants, which saves the victim both time and expense in gathering witnesses and other evidence;
• a criminal conviction is convincing evidence in itself; and
• in a civil suit, the opposing side has more access to the victim’s personal history, since document disclosure in a civil suit applies to both the plaintiff and defendant, and the Criminal Code provisions restricting the scope of admissible evidence about the victim do not apply. If the civil suit is pursued concurrently or before the criminal trial, the information brought up in the former may be utilized the latter, often to the detriment of the victim. Furthermore, the accused may argue that the victim is pursuing the criminal trial only because they want to gain as much as possible in the civil action.

Previous criminal convictions are admissible in subsequent civil proceedings. While a verdict on a criminal trial has no impact on a verdict on the civil trial of the same matter, it is inevitable that a conviction gives rise to a legal presumption of wrongdoing. Moreover, the material facts underlying the conviction are presumed correct unless proven otherwise. In this sense, a defendant’s criminal conviction renders the plaintiff’s case in a civil litigation much stronger. Even if the accused was acquitted in a criminal matter, the plaintiff’s case would be unaffected because the burden of proof in a civil case is lower than a criminal case.

2. Civil Torts

Examples of applicable torts include assault, battery, trespass to the person, breach of privacy, intentional or negligent infliction of nervous shock or emotional distress, false imprisonment, trespass to land, intimidation (usually a business tort, but applicable in some cases), and defamation.

MacKay v Buelow (1995), 11 RFL (4th) 403 provides a helpful illustration of the applicability of tort law in this area. The defendant (the plaintiff’s ex-husband) harassed and intimidated the plaintiff by continuously calling her, leaving notes at her home, threatening to kidnap their daughter, throwing things at the plaintiff, hanging a used condom in her home, stalking her, directly and indirectly threatening to kill her, videotaping her through her bathroom window, advising third parties about nude movies of the plaintiff, and continuously harassing her friends and colleagues. The court held that the conduct of the defendant was exceptionally outrageous and awarded the plaintiff damages based on the torts of trespass to the person, breach of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

3. Interaction with the Crime Victim Assistance Act

The overall effect of the CVAA provisions governing civil actions is that money awarded as judgment, settlement, or restitution must be paid to the CVAP to cover the cost or value of benefits given, except with the consent of the CVAP. The benefit of this scheme is that even if a claimant receives no additional money through a combination of reduced damages and CVAP benefits than through full damages alone, they do not have to wait for the conclusion of a civil suit to receive financial benefits; furthermore, the risk of recovering no money from the offender falls on the CVAP, not the claimant.

Section 8 of the CVAA establishes that the CVAP may, before or after providing benefits, require the claimant to pay the CVAP part or all the following amounts received to cover the cost or value of the claimant’s benefits:

• damages received in a civil action started by the claimant against a person arising out of the prescribed offence;
• amounts received in settlement of such an action; or
• amounts received as restitution under section 738 of the Criminal Code in the criminal case against the accused of the prescribed offence.

The CVAA also entitles the CVAP to recover the cost of benefits from civil actions started by a claimant after applying for CVAP benefits. If a claimant initiates civil proceedings after applying for CVAP benefits, the CVAP must receive a copy of the notice of civil claim within 10 days of service on the defendant (CVAA, s 15(1)). While as a starting point, the claimant’s entitlement to damages or settlement is unaffected by their entitlement to CVAP benefits (CVAA, s 15(2)), this is qualified by the power of the CVAP to claim partial entitlement to the proceeds of civil actions against a person arising out of a prescribed offence.

With respect to a claimant who has received CVAP benefits, the CVAA empowers the CVAP to commence action against a person arising out of a prescribed offence in the following circumstances (CVAA, s 16(1)):

• the claimant has not commenced any such action; or
• the claimant has commenced such an action, but the CVAP has not concurred to the settlement agreement reached by the parties.

If the CVAP commences such a civil action, it becomes entitled to a portion of the damages equivalent to the cost or value of benefits provided (CVAA, s 16(2)). If a claimant starts a civil action after the CVAP commences theirs, the claim available to the claimant as the plaintiff is reduced by the CVAP’s claim (CVAA, s 16(3)).

Money that the CVAP recovers from actions is applied in the following order (CVAA, s 17):

• firstly, to pay the cost of litigating the action;
• secondly, to pay the cost or value of benefits awarded;
• thirdly, to the claimant.

© Copyright 2024, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society.