Mistakes and Alterations in a Will (16:IV): Difference between revisions

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 9, 2021}}
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 22, 2024}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = wills}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = wills}}


A will may be changed by executing a new will, executing a codicil, or altering the will before it is executed. Where a will-maker wants to alter a will, section 54(2) of ''WESA'', requires that the will-maker sign and the witnesses attest the signature in the margin or near to the alteration, or at or near to a memorandum written in the will referring to the alteration. An alteration should be so attested even if made before the will itself is executed. This will avoid subsequent litigation which may arise if an unattested alteration appears to have been made after the execution of the will. '''Where a mistake is made when drafting a will, the safest course is to draw up a new, corrected will'''.
A will may be changed by executing a new will, executing a codicil, or altering the will before it is executed. Where a will-maker wants to alter a will, section 54(2) of ''WESA'', requires that the will-maker sign and the witnesses attest the signature  
* in the margin or near to the alteration, or  
* at or near to a memorandum written in the will referring to the alteration.
 
An alteration should be so attested even if made before the will itself is executed. This will avoid subsequent litigation which may arise if an unattested alteration appears to have been made after the execution of the will. '''Where a mistake is made when drafting a will, the safest course is to draw up a new, corrected will.'''


There are three reasons why executing a new will may be a preferable course of action:
There are three reasons why executing a new will may be a preferable course of action:
#a new will avoids any danger of a codicil not adequately referring to the correct will;  
# A new will avoids any danger of a codicil not adequately referring to the correct will;
#when only one document exists (i.e. the new will) there is less likelihood of misinterpretation; and  
# When only one document exists (i.e. the new will) there is lower likelihood of misinterpretation; and
#if a codicil is used to revoke a gift made in the will, the party who would have received the gift will be informed of the change made by the will-maker, which could cause personal discord in the Will-maker’s relationship with that person.  
# If a codicil is used to revoke a gift made in the will, the party who would have received the gift will be informed of the change made by the will-maker, which could cause personal discord in the will-maker’s relationship with that person.
 
An unattested alteration made after the will is executed is invalid and may also invalidate any existing part of the will that the alteration obliterated or made impossible to decipher. However, it is important to note that section 58 of ''WESA'' allows a court to recognize any document that gives effect to the testamentary disposition of the deceased, even if it does not comply with the formalities of ''WESA''. (See Section [[Making_and_Executing_a_Will_(16:III)|III.F: Court’s Power to Cure Deficiencies and Rectify Wills]], above, which also discusses the power of rectification under section 59).  


An unattested alteration made after the will is executed is invalid and may also invalidate any existing part of the will that the alteration obliterated or made impossible to decipher. However, it is important to note that section 58 of ''WESA'' allows a court to recognize any document that gives effect to the testamentary disposition of the deceased, even if it does not comply with the formalities of ''WESA''. (See '''Section III.F: Court’s Power to Cure Deficiencies and Rectify Wills''', above, which also discusses the power of rectification under section 59).  
:'''NOTE ON ELECTRONIC WILLS:''' Section 54 of ''WESA'' does not apply to electronic wills. Instead, a will maker seeking to make an alteration to an electronic will must make a new will in accordance with section 37; see Section [[Making_and_Executing_a_Will_(16:III)|III.D.2: Electronic Wills]], for more information.


'''NOTE:''' If the amendments in ''Bill 21'' are brought into force resulting in the allowance validity of electronic wills, section 54 of ''WESA'' will not apply to electronic wills. Instead, ''Bill 21'' will introduce section 54.1 which will require a will-maker seeking to alter an electronic will to make a new will in accordance with section 37 of ''WESA''. Note that this amendment has not yet come into effect; see '''Section III.D.2: Electronic Wills''', for more information.


{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters15-22}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters15-23}}

Latest revision as of 16:43, 22 August 2024

This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on August 22, 2024.



A will may be changed by executing a new will, executing a codicil, or altering the will before it is executed. Where a will-maker wants to alter a will, section 54(2) of WESA, requires that the will-maker sign and the witnesses attest the signature

  • in the margin or near to the alteration, or
  • at or near to a memorandum written in the will referring to the alteration.

An alteration should be so attested even if made before the will itself is executed. This will avoid subsequent litigation which may arise if an unattested alteration appears to have been made after the execution of the will. Where a mistake is made when drafting a will, the safest course is to draw up a new, corrected will.

There are three reasons why executing a new will may be a preferable course of action:

  1. A new will avoids any danger of a codicil not adequately referring to the correct will;
  2. When only one document exists (i.e. the new will) there is lower likelihood of misinterpretation; and
  3. If a codicil is used to revoke a gift made in the will, the party who would have received the gift will be informed of the change made by the will-maker, which could cause personal discord in the will-maker’s relationship with that person.

An unattested alteration made after the will is executed is invalid and may also invalidate any existing part of the will that the alteration obliterated or made impossible to decipher. However, it is important to note that section 58 of WESA allows a court to recognize any document that gives effect to the testamentary disposition of the deceased, even if it does not comply with the formalities of WESA. (See Section III.F: Court’s Power to Cure Deficiencies and Rectify Wills, above, which also discusses the power of rectification under section 59).

NOTE ON ELECTRONIC WILLS: Section 54 of WESA does not apply to electronic wills. Instead, a will maker seeking to make an alteration to an electronic will must make a new will in accordance with section 37; see Section III.D.2: Electronic Wills, for more information.


© Copyright 2024, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society.