Keeping Out of Trouble on Employment Insurance (8:IX): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== A. Job Search Record == | == A. Job Search Record == | ||
To prove they are “capable and available for work” but unable to find suitable employment, the claimant should keep a job search record after their claim is established. This will help protect the claimant from disentitlement and improve their chances of success if an appeal becomes necessary. In fact, the Commission may send to the claimant a form that is essentially a job search record. If the form is not filled out and returned, the claimant’s disentitlement may follow. The form is called an “active job search statement.” The statement will require the claimant to provide: | |||
* names of the businesses applied to and the names of the persons who interviewed the claimant; | * names of the businesses applied to and the names of the persons who interviewed the claimant; | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* results of application. | * results of application. | ||
The claimant should always maintain a job search record with this information, even if doing so is not required by the Commission. The job search record should include everything done to look for work. Every attempt made in search of work counts (including such things as contacting family members about employment opportunities, “cold calling,” etc.). The difficulty is that many claimants do not keep such records even though they have been warned to do so. In such cases, the claimant’s representative can only do the following: | |||
* advise the claimant to keep such lists in the future; and | * advise the claimant to keep such lists in the future; and | ||
Line 40: | Line 38: | ||
To protect against a potentially misleading report, the claimant should try to be as general as possible in their report. However, telling the truth during the interview is imperative. For example, the client should state, if true, that they would accept the going rate rather than stating their desired wage. | To protect against a potentially misleading report, the claimant should try to be as general as possible in their report. However, telling the truth during the interview is imperative. For example, the client should state, if true, that they would accept the going rate rather than stating their desired wage. | ||
If the claimant decides, after | If the claimant decides, after it is read to them, that it the Report is incorrect or misleading, they should tell the Officer immediately, to give the Officer a chance to correct the report immediately. If the Officer refuses or if the claimant later decides that they disagree, the claimant should write a letter stating their position. This is important since an appeal may be necessary and such an immediate reaction by the claimant may convince the Board of their honesty and integrity. It may also lead to the earlier reinstatement of a claimant who is disentitled for unreasonably restricting their job search. | ||
=== 2. Disputing the Report at an Appeal === | === 2. Disputing the Report at an Appeal === | ||
If there is a disentitlement based on the Report of Interview and an appeal follows, the SST may be willing to accept explanations and modifications of the report. There must be evidence to support these modifications. Further, their usual position will be that since the statement was read to the claimant, it must be true. There is an established principle supported by several court decisions to the effect that “statements made before disentitlement are to be believed more than statements made after disentitlement,” the latter suspected of being self-serving. One effective way for a claimant to demonstrate willingness to accept wages lower than the figure stated on the application form or in an interview report is to prove that they actively pursued jobs paying a lower salary than reported. | |||
If there is a disentitlement based on the Report of Interview and an appeal follows, the SST may be willing to accept explanations and modifications of the report. There must be evidence to support these modifications. Further, their usual position will be that since the statement was read to the claimant, it must be true. There is an established principle supported by several court decisions to the effect that “statements made before disentitlement are to be believed more than statements made after disentitlement,” the latter suspected of being self-serving. One effective way for a claimant to demonstrate willingness to accept wages lower than the figure stated on the application form or in an interview report is to prove that they actively pursued | |||
== C. Reporting == | == C. Reporting == |
Revision as of 12:52, 8 August 2024
This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on August 1, 2023. |
A. Job Search Record
To prove they are “capable and available for work” but unable to find suitable employment, the claimant should keep a job search record after their claim is established. This will help protect the claimant from disentitlement and improve their chances of success if an appeal becomes necessary. In fact, the Commission may send to the claimant a form that is essentially a job search record. If the form is not filled out and returned, the claimant’s disentitlement may follow. The form is called an “active job search statement.” The statement will require the claimant to provide:
- names of the businesses applied to and the names of the persons who interviewed the claimant;
- type of employment applied for;
- date of the application or contact;
- results of application.
The claimant should always maintain a job search record with this information, even if doing so is not required by the Commission. The job search record should include everything done to look for work. Every attempt made in search of work counts (including such things as contacting family members about employment opportunities, “cold calling,” etc.). The difficulty is that many claimants do not keep such records even though they have been warned to do so. In such cases, the claimant’s representative can only do the following:
- advise the claimant to keep such lists in the future; and
- (if true) argue that the claimant did not know that they had to keep such a list, and that any list now composed from memory is not a complete one, as the claimant cannot remember the details of all the employment opportunities they pursued.
Every regular benefit claimant must also register with the Commission. Claimants should visit the job board at least once a week and record these visits. Many EI offices now maintain electronic job boards that can be accessed from computer kiosks in the offices, or from home, like the Canada Job Bank.
Claimants should also keep a record of all telephone calls and any other kind of contact for further evidence of job searching. Below is an example of a “job search record”:
- June 12 – 15: Checked The Sun and The Province ads every day.
- June 12: Phoned Ajax Plumbing - George Brown, Manager, said not to send in a written application, but to call back in a month.
- June 13: Checked bulletin board at the Canada Employment Centre and copied down one possible job: phoned XYZ Deliveries, but position already taken.
- June 14: Wrote letter to Acme Amigos - no response.
- June 15: Searched Internet job sites from Frank’s house. Printed out some likely prospects.
The claimant should make the job search record as detailed and complete as possible. Include friends contacted regarding job openings, and all efforts made to look for a job. The claimant must at all times try to convince the Commission that they are making a great effort to find a job.
B. Interviews with an Investigation and Control Officer
At some point, the claimant may be summoned to the local EI office for an interview regarding their job search. Typically, the Investigation and Control Officer asks the claimant questions and makes a “Report of Interview,” which is later reviewed by an Insurance Officer who will, on the basis of the Report, decide whether or not benefits are to continue. The claimant does not need to sign or affirm the report, though it is supposed to be read to them, and a copy should be provided for the claimant’s records.
The Commission can disqualify a claimant for 7–12 weeks if the claimant fails to attend, without good cause, an interview the Commission asks them to attend (EI Act, s. 27(1)(d)). The claimant must either attend the interview or phone to make a new appointment and confirm the new appointment in writing.
1. Keeping the Record Straight
To protect against a potentially misleading report, the claimant should try to be as general as possible in their report. However, telling the truth during the interview is imperative. For example, the client should state, if true, that they would accept the going rate rather than stating their desired wage.
If the claimant decides, after it is read to them, that it the Report is incorrect or misleading, they should tell the Officer immediately, to give the Officer a chance to correct the report immediately. If the Officer refuses or if the claimant later decides that they disagree, the claimant should write a letter stating their position. This is important since an appeal may be necessary and such an immediate reaction by the claimant may convince the Board of their honesty and integrity. It may also lead to the earlier reinstatement of a claimant who is disentitled for unreasonably restricting their job search.
2. Disputing the Report at an Appeal
If there is a disentitlement based on the Report of Interview and an appeal follows, the SST may be willing to accept explanations and modifications of the report. There must be evidence to support these modifications. Further, their usual position will be that since the statement was read to the claimant, it must be true. There is an established principle supported by several court decisions to the effect that “statements made before disentitlement are to be believed more than statements made after disentitlement,” the latter suspected of being self-serving. One effective way for a claimant to demonstrate willingness to accept wages lower than the figure stated on the application form or in an interview report is to prove that they actively pursued jobs paying a lower salary than reported.
C. Reporting
In order to receive continued benefits, individuals must send in reports on a regular basis. They are usually due and cover every two calendar weeks (from Sunday to Saturday).
There are three ways to send in these reports:
- By telephone at 1 (800) 531-7555
- Online: https://srv265.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca/interdec/ouverturedesession-login/ouverturedesession-login.aspx?lang=eng
- By mailing a paper report
The timing and due dates of these reports depend on each individual claim. This information will be available to each claimant shortly after applying to EI when the Benefit statement and Access Code is received in the mail.
- Note: The paper "Report Card" method is only available to a claimant who cannot otherwise transmit their report online or by phone. The standard ways of processing and paying EI benefits are the Reporting Service by Internet and the Telephone Reporting Service.
1. What to Include in Reports
Be careful to include the following in each report:
- indicate dates and hours worked and earnings before deductions;
- provide the contact information of any employers;
- enter hours spent at school or in a training course and any training allowance received;
- indicate whether you were available for work;
- report other money earned, even if you’ll receive it later.
The information given must be accurate, otherwise the claimant could be accused of a false or misleading statement. If the claimant needs to update a report, for example to change the amount of earnings reported, they should call the Telephone Reporting Service immediately. The Commission has a policy that they will not charge or prosecute a claimant for giving false or misleading information if the claimant volunteers the correct information before an investigation begins.
© Copyright 2024, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society. |